PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כו,א גמרא

??? in the midst of implements of he is equivalent. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: a Torah scroll It is necessary for him to do to him a partition ten Mar Zutra ??? my heart Rav Ashi He saw ??? son of Rav Ashi ??? of him. a Torah scroll and does he act? for him a partition ten He said to him: like who like Rabbi Joshua son of Levi I will say for he said: Rabbi Yehoshua son of Levi the one who does not have ??? other than this Master, this one it has ??? other than this He said to him: Is this not ??? how much shall he distance himself from them and from excrement four ??? Rabba said: Rav Sahorah said: Rav Huna said They did not teach such a ruling except behind him but: before him ??? fill ??? and thus to the Prayer i.e., Amidah Really? and this statement that he said poses a contradiction: ??? son of ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? a person opposite outhouses lit., house of the seat and he prays Here in this case, with what are we dealing? in the outhouse lit. in the house of the chair in which is not excrement Really? For didn't Rav Yosef say son of ??? outhouses lit., house of the seat where they said despite the fact in which is not excrement the house of the bathhouse where they said despite the fact in which is not a person except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? In the case where it was new. Hey, isn't it the case that should bring himself ??? the seat What then? there are ??? or yes. ??? For ??? should bring himself ??? upon it to pray ??? but: opposite him did not say Raba Behold! houses ??? even though for there is in them? excrement ???

דף כו,א משנה

One suffering from gonorrhea who saw a seminal emission and a menstruant who discovered??? that she was emitting seed from sexual relations and a woman who had sexual relations who saw that she had become a menstruant they all require immersion in a mikvah And Rabbi Yehudah exempts

דף כו,א גמרא

They posed this difficulty: One who has had a seminal emission who saw a gonorrheal emission according to R' Yehudah What then? for Rabbi Yehudah exempts there in the case of a zav who saw a seminal emission originally Is this not the case where he is one who must be immersed but: One who has had a seminal emission who saw a gonorrheal emission originally he is one who must be immersed is it the case that he is obligated or, perhaps, there is no difference Come and hear: a woman who had sexual relations and she saw that she had become a menstruant she requires immersion And Rabbi Yehudah exempts Hey, isn't it the case that a woman who had sexual relations and she saw that she had become a menstruant is this case like a man who has had a seminal emission who saw a gonorrheal emission are not the two cases comparable? And Rabbi Yehudah comes and exempts Learn from this Rabbi Chiyya taught clearly and explicitly One who has had a seminal emission who saw a gonorrheal emission He requires immersion And Rabbi Yehudah exempts

דף כו,א משנה

the morning prayer i.e. Amidah may be recited until noon R' Yehuda says: until four hours The afternoon prayer until the evening Rabbi Yehudah says until the division of the afternoon The evening prayer It does not have a fixed time And the prayers of the additional services may be recited all the day R' Yehudah says until seven hours.

דף כו,א גמרא

They challenged this from a baraita: ??? with the rising of the sun in order that he will juxtapose lit., lean the blessing of redemption to the Prayer i.e., Amidah and it is found that he prays by day For this teaching for the "Vatikin" for thus said Rabbi Yochanan "Vatikin" they would complete it with the rising of the sun ??? until midnight And naught else For didn't he say Rav Mari the son of Rav Huna the son of R' Yirmiyah bar Abba Rabbi Yochanan said: In a case where a person he erred and did not pray Arvit then to recover from his error, he prays in the morning two times through the Amidah. And if he erred and did not pray the morning prayer, then to recover, he prays at Minchah two prayers the entire day He pray? and it comes until midnight ??? for him the reward for prayer in its time from here and onwards the reward for prayer ??? for him the reward for prayer in its time No. ??? for him They posed this difficulty: if he erred and did not pray the afternoon service (Minchah) What then? that he should pray Arvit two ??? he erred and did not pray Arvit he prays in the morning two times It is because of this: that it is a single day, As it is written (Gen. 1) "And there was evening, and there was morning, one day." But here, in this case, prayer a substitute in the place of sacrifice is it. And immediately that passed over is its day, nullfied is the opportunity for its sacrifice or perhaps, immediately ??? prayers for mercies She all begins ??? who seeks He pray? and it comes Come and hear: for Rav Huna the son of Yehuda said R' Yitzchak said that R' Yochanan said A case where someone erred and did not pray the afternoon service (Minchah) he prays Arvit two times And there is no meaning to the word in this It is because of this: that passed over is its day, wasted its sacrifice They challenged him from this teaching: (Ecc. 1) coins it is not possible to repair and its lack it is not possible ??? coins it is not possible to repair this ??? the recitation of Shema of Arvit and the recitation of Shema of morning, or prayer of Arvit or prayer of morning, and its lack it is not possible ??? this ??? for a matter of a commandment and not ??? with them R' Yitzchak said that R' Yochanan said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? with intent Rav Ashi said ??? also where he teaches wasted and not The tanna teaches: he erred Learn from this

דף כו,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: A case where someone erred and did not pray the afternoon service (Minchah) on the eve of the Sabbaths he prays on the night of Sabbath two A case where someone erred and did not pray the afternoon service (Minchah) on Shabbat he prays at the conclusion of the Sabbath two of weekday He makes havdalah in the first, and does not make havdalah in the second and if he makes havdalah in the second and does not make havdalah in the first, the second is credited lit, rises to him as the first It is not credited to him This comes to imply ??? that is not ??? like who that is not prayed he is equivalent. ??? for him They challenged this from a baraita: If one was praying, and he erred and did not mention powers of the rains in the blessing on the resurrection of the dead and the request in the blessing of the years we make him repeat that specific one where he erred. But if he mistakenly omits Havdalah in "Who grants understanding" We do not make him repeat that specific blessing because of the fact that it is possible to say it on the cup it is a problem it was said: Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina said the three daily prayers ??? the forefathers established them. Rabbi Yehoshua son of Levi said the three daily prayers -- corresponding to lit. opposite the Tamid-offerings our sages established them. This teaching is consistent with the position of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina and this teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Joshua son of Levi This teaching is consistent with the position of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina who taught Avraham established the prayer of morning, as it is said (Gen. 19) And he arose early -- Avraham did -- in the morning to the place that he stood in that place" And there is no meaning to the word standing except prayer as it is said (Ps. 106) "and Pinchas stood up and he prayed" Isaac established the prayer of the afternoon service (Minchah) as it is said (Gen. 24) and Isaac went out ??? in the field just before lit., in the faces of evening And there is no meaning to the word ??? except prayer as it is said (Ps. 102) prayer ??? For ??? and before Hashem ??? Ya'akov established the prayer of Arvit as it is said (Gen. 28) ??? in a place ??? in that place And there is no meaning to the word ??? except prayer as it is said (Jer. 7) And you, do not ??? this nation and do not ??? song, and prayer and do not ??? among

And This teaching is consistent with the position of R' Yehoshua son of Levi who taught: On account of what did they say that the morning prayer i.e. Amidah may be said any time until noon? for behold! The Tamid-offering of the morning was sacrificed and brought until noon and Rabbi Yehudah says until four hours for behold! The Tamid-offering of morning was sacrificed and brought until four hours and on account of what did they say The afternoon prayer until the evening for behold! The Tamid-offering of twilight was sacrificed and brought until the evening. Rabbi Yehudah says until the division of the afternoon. For behold! The Tamid-offering of twilight was sacrificed and brought until the division of the afternoon. And on account of what did they say The evening prayer It does not have fixed for behold! Abraham ??? that did not have ??? All the night. And on account of what did they say of the additional offerings that they may be brought all the day? for behold! sacrifice of the additional offerings were sacrificed all the day. Rabbi Yehudah says until "satisfied" ??? for behold! sacrifice ??? was sacrificed and brought until "satisfied" ??? And what is meant by this term the afternoon service (Minchah) that is large ??? and onwards And what is meant by this term the afternoon service (Minchah) a small one from the ninth hour ??? and onwards They posed this difficulty: Rabbi Yehudah ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) that came first he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: or ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) the last one he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Come and hear: as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: the division of the afternoon. the last one And they said but it the 11th ??? lacking one fourth Let him say ??? of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina He could say to you R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina In reality lit: In the world I would say to you prayers the forefathers established them. ??? rabbis ??? For if it was No. you say thus the prayer of ??? to R' ??? the son of Rabbi Chanina one the possibility of repair if done improperly except prayers the forefathers established them. ??? rabbis ??? Rabbi Yehudah says until four hours They posed this difficulty: until and until are in the general category or, perhaps, until and not until are in the general category Come and hear: R' Yehuda says: until the division of the afternoon. If you say, This is satisfactory until and not until are in the general category we were That there are between R' Yehudah According to the sages, except If you say, until and until are in the general category R' Yehudah