PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף מז,א גמרא
and not ??? and Abaye are they, ??? and did not say to him ??? Master, he said ??? This from the rabbis from the West ??? for him ??? For it arrived ??? of the academy of ??? He said to him: ??? Master, He said to him: and until now Is this not Master, I He said to him: Thus said Rabbi Yochanan yes. we sweep except ??? in which there is ??? for there is of it ??? yes. ??? of it ??? No. Except I can object with text from here: the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue the house of ??? in them? ??? Here, too, ??? we sweep except I would say ??? Rav Yehudah said the son of of Rav Shmuel son of ??? in the name of Rav yes. ??? to eat anything until if he tastes something ??? Rav ??? and he said to taste it was said: for what practical distinction ??? a person to say ??? his rabbi; The Rabbis taught two ??? this to this ??? three yes. ??? he ??? at first and if came ??? honor for his master or to whoever ??? from him freedom in his hand Rabbah son of son of ??? it was. ??? for him ??? among Rav Shmuel son of Rav ??? for him ??? yes. ??? permission ??? until ??? "Amen" ??? Rav Chisda he said ??? most of ??? He said to him pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama What is the difference ??? No. ??? blessing ??? also No. ??? blessing He said to him for I say all ??? "Amen" -- more than enough he does not except ??? The Rabbis taught they do not answer No. "Amen" ??? and not "Amen" ??? and not "Amen" ??? and not ??? blessing ??? ben Azzai says all ??? "Amen" ??? his children ??? his days ??? his days and all prolonging ??? lengthen to him his days and his years Rav And for Shmuel were siting at the meal he came Rav ??? son of Chiyya it was. ??? He said to him Rav Just as ??? We ??? to us He said to him Shmuel these ??? for me ??? who No. ??? the students of Rav were siting at the meal on Rav Acha They said: he came a person Raba ??? to us He said to them who ??? he makes the blessing the essence ??? he makes the blessing And the halacha is according to the opinion The greatness he makes the blessing even though who has arrived ??? he ate produce that may or may not have been properly tithed ??? this one No. Look, for him immediately So if he wished, ??? them ??? you shall Responded and he will see for him For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed and ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Rav Huna said a Tanna taught: the academy of Shammai say yes. ??? ??? and ??? first tithe from which had been removed ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this except ??? from him terumah of tithe and not ??? from him terumah that is large and it is like that which was said by Rabbi ??? for he said: R' Abahu Raysh Lakish said first tithe ??? is exempt ??? that is large as it is said (in Numbers 18) ??? from him terumah of Hashem tithe from the tithe tithe from the tithe Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not terumah that is large and terumah of tithe from the tithe He said to him: Rav ??? If so, even ??? also He said to him: upon you Scripture states:
דף מז,ב גמרא
(in Numbers 18) from all ??? for just as you see This ??? and that one No. ??? second tithe and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? This is obvious! ??? For example, ??? ??? and it was not given ??? But hey, come and learn from this. ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? the sun who ate ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? sun No. fixed ??? and the Cuthean they invite ??? why is it that No. ??? except with the land and it was taught: yes. they invite on ??? Abaye said ??? Rava said: even you say ??? and here in this other case, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? upon it For R' ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) as it is taught: Who is ??? all that is not he eats ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. But the sages say: all that is not tithe ??? and Behold! ??? As it is written ??? As Mar said: all a commandment ??? of it ??? in great quantity ??? of it -- more from Israel The Rabbis taught Who is ??? all that is not one reads the recitation of Shema Arvit morning, --- these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer. Rabbi Yehoshua says: all that is not places tefillin ben Azzai says all that do not to him fringes, ??? R' Natan says: all that do not ??? on ??? R' he gave son of Joseph says all in which there is to him children" and does not ??? others say Even if he read and year" and not sun a scholar תלמיד חכם Behold! this ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? The halacha is ??? pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama No. ??? upon it of Rav ??? son of ??? for it teaches: ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion For ??? son of Chama Rabba said: No. ??? son of Chama except that is not ??? son of ??? For it was taught: others say even he read and year" and not sun a scholar תלמיד חכם Behold! this ??? that I Rav ??? son of ??? the sages, and pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama he that is not ??? that he brought ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and study. them ??? from the rabbis ??? he ate he immersed ??? he immersed This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? According to Rabbinic law, How so? How should we understand this? ??? that is not ??? first tithe ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this For example, ??? What would you have said? Like that which was said by for him Rav ??? Come and learn from this. ??? second tithe ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this who have been redeemed and not redeemed ??? second tithe For example, ??? atop ??? and the Merciful One he said (Deut. 14) ??? into your hand silver in which there is ??? upon it an image that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? atop ??? and not ??? By means of money and the Merciful One he said (Lev. 27) and gave ??? and he stood ??? and the attendant who ate less than ??? This is obvious! ??? But the beginning of the teaching, an olive's volume a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, less than ??? and the stranger i.e., the non-Jew yes. they invite ??? This is obvious! Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? and not he immersed for he said: Rabbi Zeira that R' Yochanan said In reality lit: In the world he does not ??? until ??? and how much time is the duration of that is not he immersed a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? women and slaves and children yes. they invite ??? he said Rabbi Yosei a child ??? invited upon it Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: women and slaves and children yes. they invite upon them he for he said: like Rabbi Joshua son of Levi for thus said R' Yehoshua ben Levi: even though where they said a child ??? yes. invited upon it but: doing that specific ??? that ten and he said Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi nine and a slave combine together They challenged him from this teaching: It once happened ??? Eliezer ??? to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue and did not find ten ??? his male slave ??? that ten ??? yes. No. ??? No. two ??? one he departs it is dealing with a case where there is only one. And how does he act? thus For didn't Rav Yehudah say all ??? his male slave transgresses a "Do this" i.e., a positive commandment as it is said (Lev. 25) In reality lit: In the world at them." ??? for a matter of a commandment that I a commandment ??? She a commandment for many people that I and he said Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi In reality lit: In the world ??? a person to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue so that ??? with ten that are the first for even if hundred shall come after him: ??? upon it the reward for all of them the reward for all of them You might have thought except I would say ??? to him the reward for opposite all of them Rav Huna said nine and the Ark combine together He said to him Rav ??? and the Ark a person he except Rav Huna said nine can be seen ??? combine together Watch out for leading vav !! And there are those who say it was For ??? And there are those who say it was For ??? Rabbi Ami said two Sabbath combine together He said to him: Rav ??? Sabbath a person he except Rabbi Ami said two scholars ??? this one for that one in matters of halacha. combine together ??? Rav Chisda For example, I and Rav Sheishet ??? Rav Sheishet For example, I and Rav Chisda that R' Yochanan said a child ??? invited upon it ??? a child ??? two ??? invited upon it or in the case that one is not ??? two ??? yes. invited upon it And there is no meaning to the word ??? in the case of a child. this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? two ??? yes. No. ??? No. and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by yes. ??? in the case of a child. it uses these particular words to include what? Is this not
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.