It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קב,א משנה

??? and he remembered based on this lit: from after, ??? after ??? or ??? is exempt In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- to do ??? between ??? or whether ??? and he remembered before it was even the case that she was made ??? is exempt This is the general rule: all ??? sin-offerings are not they are obligated until that it should be ??? ??? are exempt until that it should be ???

דף קב,א גמרא

this one ??? he is liable Is it not the case that he remembered and we have learnt in a Mishna: all ??? sin-offerings are not they are obligated until that it should be ??? Rav said ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? in his hand he For example, ??? to do ??? Here, too, ??? to do ??? between ??? between ??? and he remembered before it was even the case that she was made ??? is exempt except Rabba said: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that This is the general rule: where he teaches ??? The tanna teaches: except Rabba said: both The tanna teaches: ??? and he remembered based on this lit: from after, ??? So, too, No. he remembered ??? after or ??? or ??? is exempt Rav Ashi said: it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? and he remembered based on this lit: from after, ??? after or ??? or ??? is exempt this one ??? he is liable In what matters are we saying this? ??? and forgot but not and forgot had a vision is exempt for all of ??? sin-offerings are not they are obligated until that it should be ??? This is the general rule: all ??? sin-offerings ??? it was said: two cubits in error two cubits with intent two cubits in error Rava said: is exempt Rava said: he is liable Rava said: is exempt even ??? for he said: yes. ??? the measure there i.e., in another mishna he and so when ??? in error ??? But here, in this case, ??? No. and in what way If it was ??? he except ??? Rava said: he is liable and even According to the sages, that they said there are ??? the measure there i.e., in another mishna he ??? But here, in this case, ??? in his hand No. and in what way If it was ??? Behold! in his hand So rather, ??? Rabbah said In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? in the mouth ??? or in the mouth ??? he is liable ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? after or ??? or ??? is exempt there i.e., in another mishna that is not ??? Here in this case, that he came ??? Rav said ??? son of Abaye Even We also ??? there are he eats food One he is liable upon it four sin-offerings and a guilt-offering one ??? who ate milk This is only in the case notar from ??? Rabbi Meir says: Even if it was Sabbath ??? he is liable They said to him: he does not from the Name But why? this one yes. a way ??? objection except immediately that he came ??? for him a place Here in this case, also, immediately that he came ??? for him a place

דף קב,ב משנה

the act of building how much ??? he is liable the act of building Any thing that was ??? and the finishing hammer-blow ??? Any thing that was he is liable This is the general rule: Anyone who does work ??? on Shabbat he is liable ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says Even ??? on ??? in the hour of work he is liable because it was ??? work

דף קב,ב גמרא

Any thing that was for what ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? which provides Responded ??? of it ??? regarding a tabernacle which provides ??? of it ??? Abaye said immediately ??? No. my slave thus except which provides Responded makes ??? a small one ??? upon it ??? a small one ??? regarding a tabernacle ??? doing ??? a small one ??? upon it ??? a small one Rav Acha son of Ya'akov he said yes. ??? in a place ??? except which provides a householder ba'al habayit' in which there is to him ??? regarding a tabernacle which provides ??? in it ??? to its midst ??? Shmuel said ??? ??? he is liable They challenged him from this teaching: one he gives ??? and one he gives ??? who gives ??? he is liable ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Yosei says: and even raised up ??? atop ??? of stones he is liable except three ??? are they, ??? he is required ??? he is required also ??? It is because of this: What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav said: It is because of this: builds And Shmuel said It is because of this: finishing hammer-blow One who makes ??? of ??? Rav said: It is because of this: builds And Shmuel said It is because of this: finishing hammer-blow ??? Rav said: It is because of this: builds And Shmuel said It is because of this: finishing hammer-blow And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard the first ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav It is because of this: ??? objection but: makes ??? of ??? a way ??? objection I would say give thanks for him ??? and if we had heard In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav It is because of this: ??? but: ??? a way ??? objection I would say give thanks for him ??? and if we had heard In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Shmuel but: ??? both I would say give thanks for him for Rav, Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rav brought this very question he gave son of ??? Yochanan ??? It is because of this: What then does it mean when it says ??? for him in his hands It is because of this: finishing hammer-blow ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? and the finishing hammer-blow I would say ??? the finishing hammer-blow Come and hear:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.