It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קח,א גמרא

??? It is because of this: ??? a thing ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Oshaya: ??? he is liable but when it is not ??? is exempt there i.e., in another mishna Is this not we were ??? Here in this case, we were ??? raw lit., living and "uf" ??? Rav Huna said ??? tefillin atop ??? of "uf" tahor Rav Yosef said And what can we come and learn from this? is what he has ??? of them he is liable Abaye said to him: ??? Come and learn from this. For if it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: immediately that there is in it: ??? No. Come and learn from this. ??? in the west all ??? upon it he does not ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Rabbi Zeira (Lev. 1) ??? ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? he in what way does ??? for him he read He said to him Abaye ??? he and the Merciful One ??? that it is possible that they said R' Zayra said: Even We also ??? ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? he we were ??? he read ??? except If you say, Is this not ??? he why is it that It is necessary to teach this he read ??? Abaye said to him: In reality lit: In the world I would say to you Is this not ??? he and It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: immediately that there is in it: ??? Come and learn from this. Mar, the son of Ravina brought this very question ??? son of Isaac What then? to write tefillin atop ??? of a fish tahor He said to him if ??? Elijah and he said What then does it mean when it says if ??? Elijah and he said Shall I say If it was is what he has ??? If it was the one who does not have ??? this one ??? is what he has ??? And furthermore, Watch out for leading vav For it was taught in a mishna: ??? and its skin ??? the dead except if ??? Elijah and he said If it was ??? of him If it was No. ??? Shmuel ??? are they, ??? the king ??? for water that he came ??? He said to him Shmuel ??? a person Rabbah ??? from the West ??? his face in front ??? she became for him ??? He went he found for Rav, He said to him ??? that do not ??? tefillin except atop ??? livestock that is tahor He said to him As it is written (Ex. 13) so that ??? Hashem ??? from ??? from where do we learn ??? that he was ??? as it is said (II Kings 3) and they shall fear Moav ??? ??? a place it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there a thing which does ??? Even here, a thing which does ??? I would say his heart As it is written (Deut. 10) ??? ??? your hearts" I would say ??? As it is written (Jer. 6) there are orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? he was astonished ??? he was astonished And there is no meaning to the word ??? he was astonished ??? that is not he was astonished He said to him What then does it mean when it says Your Name ??? He said to him: ??? for him ??? Shmuel ??? bread ??? a cup ??? and not ??? for him outhouses lit., house of the seat so that thus it will be ??? Rav and he said one ??? No. ??? for him My son, and thus ??? a place it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there a thing which does ??? Even here, a thing which does ??? these are the words of R' ??? R' Natan says: it is not necessary for him Behold! he says (Gen. 17) ??? male, who No. ??? meat ??? a place ??? between ??? The Rabbis taught ??? tefillin atop ??? livestock that is tahor and atop ??? raw lit., living that is tahor and atop ??? that are theirs ??? and the halacha is to Moses ??? that the tefillin, ??? but: yes. ??? Not on regarding ??? livestock that is tamei and not on regarding ??? raw lit., living that is tamei and it is not necessary for him to say atop ??? that are theirs And there is no meaning to the word ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? -- this refers to ??? He asked ??? one R' Yehoshua ??? that do not ??? tefillin on ??? livestock that is tamei As it is written (Ex. 13) so that ??? Hashem ??? Except I can object with text from here: atop ??? to ??? He said to him I will tell a parable to you is from that which is belonging to ??? for two people ??? one ??? a king and one ??? whichever from them ??? you shall says this ??? a king Except I can object with text from here: ??? He said to him: the Torah he said (Deut. 14) No. ??? all ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? He said to him ???

דף קח,א משנה

Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? on Shabbat

דף קח,ב משנה

but: makes he who ??? of them his bread he gives ??? the cooked food R' Yosi said Is it not the case that he ??? between is greater than or whether ??? and they are who salt ??? he gives oil initially ??? or ???

דף קח,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said This is what he means: Watch out for leading vav And we do not make who salt ??? but: makes he who salt ??? he said Rabbi Yosei Is it not the case that he ??? between ??? between ??? They posed this difficulty: Rabbi Yosei ??? or ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? The tanna teaches: Rabbi Yosei ??? He said to him Rabbah this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, and they are who salt ??? from this general principle it would follow of R' Yosi ??? except Rabbah said ??? and thus Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? Another teaching is like this: Watch out for leading vav And we do not make who salt ??? to place ??? but: makes he who salt ??? and eats of them his bread he gives ??? the cooked food R' Yosi said And so because of ??? are forbidden ??? are permitted they shall say work is greater than forbidden work ??? it is permitted. except both these and these: are forbidden there are. and they are who salt ??? he gives oil and salt or oil and water but only that did not have He shall give" water and salt ??? and an etrog ??? It was taught by Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make who salt ??? What then does it mean when it says who salt ??? Rabbah and Rav Yosef; son of Abba that they said ??? all ??? of them and how much time is the duration of Abayye said: two ??? for what my slave to it he said Rabbi Abahu ??? It was taught by Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? yes. ??? and An egg on Shabbat Rav ??? in the name ??? he said ??? is forbidden and An egg it is permitted. Rav Nachman said At the beginning, it was. ??? I thought to say ??? for him for Shmuel said: ??? my taunters from upon me immediately of what I heard about this teaching when ??? came and he said in the west ??? No. ??? certainly ??? It was taught by Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? an etrog ??? and An egg ??? are not ??? In reality lit: In the world When Rav Dimi came he said Always, No. ??? a person ??? Rav Yosef said ??? Sodom ??? a person he that is not ??? Abaye said to him: No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. -- why must that case be taught as well? ??? that even in all since the days of ??? No. ??? except even a person ??? in all since the days of ??? No. ??? for what practical distinction This is like ??? it was. ??? and it comes ??? of Rabbi ??? He said to him: What then? ??? from those ??? on Shabbat He said to him it is of acceptable worth. What then? ??? He said to him: -- this refers to No. I hear ??? of it I hear for he said: R' Zeira Oftentimes He said to him in the name of Rav gifts Oftentimes he said to it in the name ??? in the name ??? of Shmuel and Levi ??? One says wine in the midst of the well is forbidden for the sake of the well is permitted. and one says ??? some texts read: even for the sake of the well is forbidden ??? of Shmuel he for he said: wine in the midst of the well is forbidden for the sake of the well is permitted. ??? Shmuel ??? a person ??? for the sake of the well on Shabbat ??? for him from those Is this not ??? for him ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Shmuel said: ??? even atop על גבי the well is forbidden ??? for him from those Shall I say ??? for him ??? except Levi and not one he said except one ??? for him ??? and one ??? for him ??? and not ??? Which ??? Which ??? Mar said: ??? Shmuel said ??? a person ??? he gives for the sake of ??? on Shabbat and does not ??? son of ??? you shall he arises in front ??? He saw ??? and he opens He said to him: all this certainly No. ??? Master, Shmuel He sent to him Rabbi ??? for Master ??? to us Master, ??? Shmuel He sent to him ??? to you that is not you say It is distressing well I except Thus said Shmuel that is good ??? morning, ??? and pilgrimage festivals ??? Arvit from all ??? Another teaching is like this: he said Rabbi ??? It is because of this: Rabbi Yehudah that is good ??? morning, ??? and pilgrimage festivals Arvit from all ??? he would say a hand to the eye ??? a hand ??? a hand ??? a hand ??? a hand ??? a hand ??? a hand on account of ??? a hand

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.