It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א גמרא

??? As it is written (Gen. 14) two ten year" his male slave ??? and three ten year" ??? and in four, ten year" ??? Rabba said: son of ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said all a city ??? from the House of Assembly the synagogue ??? as it is said (Ezra 9) ??? the house of our God ??? ??? and that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? we do not have an objection to it. Rav Ashi said I act ??? that is not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? iniquity No. ??? Rabba said: son of ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said under Yishmael and not under ??? under ??? and not under ??? under ??? and not under a scholar under a scholar תלמיד חכם and not under ??? Rabba said: son of ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said all ??? and not ??? all ??? and not vexation of heart all ??? and not ??? the tip of all evil and not a woman ??? Rabba said: son of ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said if ??? all the days ??? heaven ??? and all people ??? yes. ??? to write ??? of is a voluntary act What scripture supports this position? Rav said ??? (Prov. 25) heaven ??? and earth ??? and heart kings yes. ??? Rabba said: son of ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said proper ??? to dream ??? Rav Chisdah said and on that very day and Rav Yosef said Even if on Shabbat Rav Joshua the son of of Rav This ??? my heart Rav Ashi my slave for him ??? And they said to him to taste Master, something He said to them in a fast ??? And they said to him and not reasoned for him Master, about this teaching of Rav Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah ??? a person ??? He said to him ??? a dream he Rabba said: son of ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said proper ??? to dream ??? and Rav Chisdah said and on that very day and Rav Yosef said Even if ??? and if ??? they do not interrupt ??? But hey, wasn't this already taught elsewhere But the beginning of the teaching, they do not interrupt at the end of the teaching, ??? according to the words of Torah as it is taught: a fellowship that were is involved in the Torah ??? With the recitation of Shema and they do not interrupt to the Prayer i.e., Amidah that R' Yochanan said They did not teach such a ruling except For example, Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai ??? but: For example, do we ??? With the recitation of Shema to the Prayer i.e., Amidah For it was taught: in the same way that do not ??? to the Prayer i.e., Amidah thus in the same way they do not interrupt With the recitation of Shema For It was taught by this particular ??? year" for he said: Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? and thus ??? old men ??? Rabbi Eliezer said son of ??? is involved ??? the year ??? No. we were ??? No. ??? "Hear!" and not to the Prayer i.e., Amidah

דף יא,א משנה

He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? lest ??? and went out and not ??? and not ??? its implements and not he should read by the light of a lamp ??? And they said ??? one who sees ??? but: he No. he should read one like it; does not eat ??? with ??? because of ??? transgression

דף יא,א גמרא

It was taught there: No. he stands a person in a personal domain ??? in the public domain ??? in a personal domain but: if He brought in his head and the majority of his body to the place that he was drink is permitted.

דף יא,ב גמרא

and thus ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? What then does it mean when it says Abayye said: She She Rava said: She ??? and We ??? Abayye said: ??? I thought to say to it where he teaches and thus ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? If it was is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? If it was is a voluntary act the public ??? except Is this not ??? Rava said: and thus ??? in the matter of tithe and thus Rav Sheshet said and thus ??? in the matter of tithe For it was taught in a baraita they drink on ??? between on ??? between on ??? but exempt him These are the words of R' Meir R' Elazar ??? he is obligated but the sages say on ??? he is liable on ??? is exempt because it was he turns ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? lest ??? and went out Is this not ??? to him ??? No. ??? for him in his hands Come and hear: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? to him ??? Is this not on the eve of the Sabbaths No. For this teaching on Shabbat For it was taught: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? on the eve of the Sabbath. with ??? So, with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: artisan a way ??? he is liable as it is taught: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? to him ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not the moneychanger ??? and if he has fulfilled his obligation is exempt but: is forbidden These are the words of Rabbi Meir. R' Yehuda says: artisan a way ??? he is liable but the remainder of every person is exempt One teaching He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? and if he has fulfilled his obligation is exempt but: is forbidden And another teaching He has not fulfilled his obligation. and if he has fulfilled his obligation he is liable A sin-offering Rav Yosef said There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one R' Yehudah He said to him Abaye ??? for him to Rabbi Meir ??? we were ??? who ??? for him For if it was No. you say thus Except I can object with text from here: ??? on Shabbat According to Rabbi Meir, Here, too, that is not he is obligated except Rav Hamnunah said There is no difficulty. here, in the case of a zav the master of two appearances here, in the case of a zav the master of three appearances What is the difference One suffering from gonorrhea the master of two appearances ??? for him ??? One suffering from gonorrhea the master of three also should bring himself ??? No. ??? except his heart by day Hey, isn't it the case that should bring himself so that that did not have ??? its implements R' Zayra said: This a Tanna taught: he for he said: all ??? No. ??? He accounts for For it was taught in a baraita ??? on the wall if on account of ??? Behold! this crying ??? if on account of

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.