It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קיב,א גמרא

??? ??? he ??? but nevertheless a prohibition does apply to it. and there are ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this is what he has two ??? What would you have said? one ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? to it What would you have said? ??? to it Come and hear from this that a woman ??? on ??? it was said: ??? and a sandal-fish One teaching he is liable A sin-offering And another teaching is exempt but: is forbidden And another teaching is permitted. ??? it is a problem ??? it is a problem a sandal-fish ??? There is no difficulty. this one where he teaches he is liable A sin-offering ??? is exempt but: is forbidden ??? is permitted. initially ??? a sandal-fish ??? There is no difficulty. this one where he teaches he is liable A sin-offering ??? is exempt but: is forbidden ??? we do not have is permitted. ??? of him. among two Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Yehudah of Rav Yehudah the brother of Rav Sala the Chasid: it was. for him This certain individual ??? There were times when ??? of him. ??? Oftentimes he departs of him. ??? he came in front ??? He said to him ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him he is liable A sin-offering He said to him now is exempt but: is forbidden ??? it is a problem for me he is liable A sin-offering ??? for me What is the reason? He said to him It is because of this: ??? also Oftentimes ??? of him. I Oftentimes he departs of him. ??? He said to him If so, is permitted. ??? Rabbi ??? he was going secondly, For R' ??? He said to him: What then does it mean when it says ??? to it He said to him ??? livestock and winds ??? Abaye it was. he arises in front of Rav Yosef ??? for him ??? He said to him: What then does it mean when it says ??? for him He said to him ??? what is the difference here, from that of Rabbi ??? there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he For if it was ??? for him ??? He said to him ??? Rabbi Yochanan who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah Learn from this "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah Who is it as it is taught: a sandal-fish ??? two ??? or two ??? or ??? all ??? are his tahor One ??? or One ??? or ??? most of ??? are his tamei R' Yehuda says: ??? tamei ??? tahor Ulla said (and there are those who say Rabbah son of son of ??? R' Yochanan said: ??? in the matter of ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement in the matter of Sabbath but not in the matter of chalitza and we were at of it ??? who follow the reasoning ??? ??? Shall I say who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? you shall in the matter of Sabbath also ??? you shall but not ??? he For it was taught in a mishna: ??? of ??? is valid So rather, who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah ??? Is this not ??? he in the matter of Sabbath also Is this not ??? he but not ??? he I will say ??? of ??? is valid in a case ??? he Here in this case, ??? Is this not ??? he For thus said R' Yehudah ??? tahor Perhaps, Is this not ??? he In reality lit: In the world According to the opinion of R' Yehudah I would say and thus ??? And hey, you can also come and hear from this. and so when say ??? of ??? is valid in a case

דף קיב,ב גמרא

??? he But here, in this case, ??? Is this not ??? he and who that R' Yochanan said thus For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say The halacha is ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: a sandal-fish ??? One ??? tamei ??? the second ??? tahor ??? But a priest who is tamei, ??? Is this not there is no difference ??? and there is no difference ??? No. ??? but: ??? What then does it mean when it says tahor If so, ??? the second ??? tahor from ??? But a priest who is tamei, ??? In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: ??? tahor Rav said Isaac son of Joseph shall be ??? in which there is to him four ??? and four ??? that did not have ??? his words of R' Yochanan For he came ??? Rav said ??? son of Abba Rav said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah And Rabbi Yochanan said: That is not the halacha like R' Yehudah and who that R' Yochanan said thus Hey, isn't it the case that ??? R' Yochanan According to the opinion of R' Yehudah Learn from this like R' Yehudah he reasons for himself. ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yochanan It was taught there: all implements of ??? houses ??? he is required ??? olive tree ??? and he returned ??? olive tree ??? until ??? What then? He said to him: R' Yochanan Rabbi you have taught us regarding a sandal-fish ??? One ??? tamei ??? the second ??? tahor from ??? But a priest who is tamei, ??? say to you what is the difference here, the first for it is the case that ??? the second the second also ??? the first and is what you say? Do you really mean that? to us upon it ??? Here in this case, also, ??? a seminal emission upon it ??? judgement son of a person that it is possible that they said For example, judgement son of a person R' Zeira said Rabba said: son of ??? if ??? My son, ??? do we My son, men and if ??? My son, men do we ??? and not ??? of R' Chaninah son of Dosa and of Rabbi ??? son of ??? except ??? and Wineskins ??? of wine ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this is what he has both ??? What would you have said? one ??? nullify to it ??? of ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this for there is to it ??? What would you have said? ??? nullify to it ??? Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this for there is to it both ??? What would you have said?

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.