It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קכד,א גמרא

??? on ??? his fellow and a hand his fellow on ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? in which there is on its head ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: ??? from he opens this ??? on Shabbat R' Tarfon says Behold! he ??? the vessels ??? this one of which we were speaking? Rabbah said From where can you derive perhaps, In reality lit: In the world I would say to you after ??? vessels ??? reeds The reason is What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: ??? No. ??? ??? for he said: Rabbi ??? that is not ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) Rabbi Yehoshua reasoned ??? the opening ??? he is equivalent. ??? and R' Tarfon reasoned ??? the opening ??? he is equivalent. ??? R' ??? She

דף קכד,א משנה

all the vessels ??? or in the case that one is not ??? R' ??? says yes. ??? except ???

דף קכד,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says that did not have ??? Rabbah said ??? a thing ??? that did not have ??? a thing ??? and a thing ??? yes. ??? No. and he came Rabbi ??? to say and even a thing ??? yes. ??? did not say to him Raba ??? that did not have ??? for him except Rabba said: ??? a thing ??? between ??? between ??? that did not have ??? And even if ??? and a thing ??? yes. ??? No. and he came Rabbi ??? to say and even a thing ??? yes. ??? No. ??? Rav ??? and Rav Acha son of ??? and Rav Huna son of ??? who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi ??? Behold! ??? in what way does ??? He said to them Rav ??? something ??? of ??? Abaye said to him: ??? for Master who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi ??? Behold! ??? in what way does ??? them He said to him: Rav ??? He explains -- something ??? of ??? Abaye to Raba ??? if there are of it Assessment of ??? it And if not, yes. ??? it Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? they agree ??? upon it meat that he is forbidden ??? Here in this case, also, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita yes. ??? ??? and thus ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? good a thing ??? he Perhaps, a thing ??? between ??? between ??? is forbidden there i.e., in another mishna What is the reason? immediately ??? a thing ??? he ??? Yom Tov because Sabbath And if you say Sabbath ??? for it is the case that a thing ??? Sarai What case is he dealing with? in a case That there are ??? implements of upon it in a case ??? implements of upon it No. and who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? fruits a way ??? on Yom Tov but not on Shabbat and who No. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: There is no difference between Yom Tov to Shabbat except the needs of food for the soul only. Rav Yosef said There is no difficulty. this one R' Eliezer this one Rabbi Yehoshua as it is taught: that specific and his son ??? R' Eliezer says: ??? ??? in order ??? and the second makes to him livelihood. in his place on account of that did not have ??? R' Yehoshua says ??? ??? in order ??? and does not ??? the second running this ??? running this ??? From where can you derive perhaps, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Eliezer there i.e., in another mishna except where it is possible ??? but: in a case where it is not possible ??? No. So, too, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehoshua there i.e., in another mishna where it is possible ??? but: in a case where it is not possible ??? No. except Rav Pappa said: There is no difficulty. this one the academy of Shammai this one the academy of Hillel For it was taught in a baraita The academy of Shammai say:

דף קכד,ב גמרא

We do not bring out ??? and a lulav and a Torah scroll ??? and the academy of Hillel permit I will say ??? them ??? who ??? them ??? Is this not It is because of this: ??? And even Rav derive it about this teaching of Raba for he said: Rav Master, that did not have ??? that did not have ??? is forbidden The reason is that did not have ??? but: ??? is permitted. Really? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Kahana ??? my heart Rav and he said ??? for him ??? upon it Is this not This comes to imply which is a matter ??? yes. ??? No. Thus said them ??? And if you like, I could say there i.e., in another mishna ??? it was. Rav ??? son of Rachel it was. for him this particular among ??? he came in front of Raba He said to him: What then? ??? He said to him: Sarai ??? for me other than this they saw ??? for me also ??? He said to him: ??? to you ??? the World: Sarai ??? he said Rabbi Abba he said Rabbi Chiyya son of ??? Rav said ??? of the validity is permitted. ??? on Shabbat but: of ??? No. Rabbi Eliezer says Even of ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? In this case, Let us say, Rav of ??? No. Hey, isn't it the case that Rav ??? he reasons for himself. except ??? In this case, Let us say, Rabbi Eliezer Even of ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? I would say and thus Rabbi Eliezer said

דף קכד,ב משנה

all the vessels ??? on Shabbat ??? with them but only ??? doing a summary of work shards of ??? of them the mouth of ??? shards of glass ??? of them the mouth of reversed Rabbi Yehudah says only. ??? doing a summary of ??? shards of ??? into their midst soup ??? and of glass ??? into their midst oil

דף קכד,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said It is a disagreement ??? from the eve of Sabbath ??? reasoned a summary of ??? yes. a summary of work ??? No. and one master reasons that even a summary of work ??? but: ??? on Shabbat the words of all are are permitted Because ??? atop ??? is permitted. ??? Rav ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? vessels ??? begins ??? Shall I say ??? from the eve of Yom Tov (holiday) pieces of wood in reality ??? except Is this not on Yom Tov And we have learned ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? vessels except If it was said thus it was said: Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said It is a disagreement ??? on Shabbat ??? reasoned ??? he and one master reasons that nolad he but: from the eve of Sabbath the words of all are are permitted Because ??? while it is still day One teaching ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? vessels And another teaching in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? vessels And another teaching yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? vessels this one is Rabbi Yehudah this one Rabbi Shimon this one Rabbi ??? Rav Nachman said Behold! ??? Sarai ??? upon them ??? certainly ??? Rav Nachman said Shmuel said pottery a small one is permitted. ??? but: ??? No. Rav ??? that are his he said even ??? but: in the public domain No. And Rabba said even in the public domain And he is consistent Raba with his reasoning of Raba he was going ??? he came ??? heard him atones for him ??? of him. rabbis ??? he said No. ??? that is not We have a tradition that ??? also ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? who It was not ??? of him. ??? Here in this case, also, ??? To me Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? is permitted. ??? on Shabbat Another teaching is like this: ??? She ??? is permitted. ??? on Shabbat and not ??? from it ??? of it ??? and to make adjacent of it the footprints the mattress and if The blood was, in fact, sprinkled. in the dunghill is forbidden He disagreed with this Rav ??? Except I can object with text from here: he could sprinkle for him ??? So, here, ??? except Rav Pappa said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.