It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קכח,א גמרא

but not ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? According to Rabbinic law, ??? that is not ??? and not first tithe ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? from him tithe and not raised up i.e., separated from him terumah that is large What would you have said? Like that which was said by for him Rav ??? Come and learn from this. ??? for him ??? and not second tithe ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? and not redeemed ??? tithe ??? atop ??? he said (Deut. 14) ??? into your hand a thing in which there is in it an image that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? atop ??? he said and gave ??? and he stood ??? and not ??? The Rabbis taught ??? ??? because it was ways of eating ??? and ??? because it was ways of eating ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says Even ??? shards of glass because it was ways of eating ??? He said to him: Rabbi Natan Except I can object with text from here: ??? because it was ways of eating ??? and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ??? No. ??? he said Ameimar This is only in the case is what he has ??? Rav Ashi said ??? except for he says for him R' he gave ??? because it was ways of eating ??? If it was it has ??? why is it that No. except ??? So, here, ??? Abayye said: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel and Rabbi Shimon and Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Akiva all of them they both reason this way all Israel My son, kings are these Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel this one of which we were speaking? R' Shimon For it was taught in a baraita My son, kings ??? atop ??? oil ??? which provides ??? of My son, kings ??? Rabbi Shimon says: all Israel My son, kings are these R' Yishmael and Rabbi Akiva as it is taught: Behold! that were ??? in it ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? the daughter of ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? that specific ??? that specific ??? to him a Tanna taught: It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael and it was taught It is because of this: Rabbi Akiva all Israel ??? The rabbis taught: ??? pieces of wood ??? if ??? livestock ??? those particular And if not, yes. ??? those particular Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? in the hand of one is permitted. ??? is forbidden ??? yes. ??? from them on Shabbat ??? livestock ??? from them on Shabbat ??? in the hand of and eats but only that did not have ??? in a vessel ??? and eats but only that did not have ??? in a vessel in great quantity these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. But the sages say: ??? and eats but only that did not have ??? in his hand in great quantity like the way that he was makes ??? and thus ??? and thus ??? and thus in the remainder of varieties of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? her name Hey, isn't it the case that This certain individual for he said: them one he is required ??? except ??? it was said: meat that is salted is permitted. ??? on Shabbat meat ??? Rav Huna he said is permitted. ??? Rav Chisda he said is forbidden ??? Rav Huna he said is permitted. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Huna ??? of Rav it was. Rav like R' Yehudah he reasons for himself. is what he has muktzeh regarding muktzeh as regard to eating, derive it like Rabbi Yehudah regarding muktzeh ??? derive it like Rabbi Shimon Rav Chisda he said is forbidden ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Isaac son of Ami ??? my heart Rav Chisda and he saw This certain individual son of ??? where they did ??? for him ??? and Rav Chisdah said its lack a purse ??? Here in this case, that I son of ??? The Rabbis taught a fish that is salted is permitted. ??? a fish ??? is forbidden ??? meat between ??? or whether that is salted is permitted. ??? like Rabbi ??? The rabbis taught: ??? ??? because it was ways of eating for dogs

דף קכח,ב גמרא

meat ??? because it was ways of eating to a beast water ??? because of that are ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all ??? is forbidden ??? because of ???

דף קכח,ב משנה

??? ??? before ??? so that ??? and they descend ??? it until ??? a woman ??? he built Rabbi Yehuda said when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that he was take One ??? One but: if he was ??? forbidden

דף קכח,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said Rav said livestock ??? sends ??? underneath it and if is credited lit, rises is credited lit, rises They challenged him from this teaching: livestock ??? makes to it livelihood. in its place on account of that did not have they shall be allowed to die of natural causes livelihood. yes. ??? No. There is no difficulty. this one where it is possible ??? this one For if it was ??? yes. and if No. sends ??? underneath it And then it happened that nullify implements of ??? reasoned nullify implements of ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? life, a law established by the Torah and comes a law established by the Torah ??? yes. ??? No. ??? about this teaching ??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? but not ??? What is the reason? did not say Abaye It is because of this: ??? One teaching ??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? but not in the public domain the his wife ??? he built in the public domain and it is not necessary to say ??? And another teaching yes. ??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? but: ??? of them ??? this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? yes. ??? but: ??? he returns is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? yes. ??? did not say Abaye at the end of the teaching, ??? Abayye said: And if one ??? on earth. So, too, ??? them ??? he would place them ??? on earth. and He uprooted them ???

דף קכח,ב משנה

yes. ??? ??? on Yom Tov but: ??? the his wife on Shabbat and read to it wisdom from one place to another place ??? upon it the Sabbath ??? ??? Rabbi Yosei says: Even ??? and all ??? doing on Shabbat

דף קכח,ב גמרא

How so? ??? Rav Yehudah he said ??? ??? that did not have ??? Rav ??? he said ??? in the case of the flesh. so that that went out ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav Yehudah How so? ??? are grasping ??? that did not have ??? to him ??? he gives to him ??? his mouth so that ??? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ??? we were on livestock that is tahor on Yom Tov in what way does does he act? Abayye said: sends ??? of salt ??? to it in the midst of ??? so that ??? upon it ??? who ??? atop ??? so that ??? upon it ??? that is tahor but: that is tamei No. What is the reason מאי טעמא that is tamei No. ??? and if ??? No. ??? the his wife ??? a Tanna taught: for him ??? the his wife and read to it wisdom from one place to another place ??? upon it the Sabbath it uses these particular words to include what? to include this one For the Rabbis taught if it was it requires ??? to it the lamp and if it was it requires ??? to it oil in the hand of and if he does not doubt whether in the hand of ??? and if he does not doubt whether ??? to it in a vessel Mar said: if it was it requires ??? to it the lamp This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? What would you have said? immediately that is not ??? is forbidden Come and hear from this ??? reason out the logic. If it was that it is possible something ??? if it was it requires ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him It is because of this: ??? Rabbah and Rav Yosef; that they said ??? yes. ??? Rav Ashi said: Even if you say there are ??? to it in a vessel a way ??? where it is possible ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said raw lit., living The whole time ??? if it was open, between he said it requires I between No. he said it requires I ??? upon it the Sabbath ??? between he said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.