It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קל,א משנה

Rabbi Eliezer says: if No. ??? implements of ??? on Shabbat it is revealed ??? witnesses And furthermore, he said ??? pieces of wood to do ??? to do ??? A general principle: Rabbi Akiva said: all work where it is possble ??? It is not ??? the Sabbath ??? where it is not possible ??? the Sabbath

דף קל,א גמרא

They posed this difficulty: The reason is ??? It is because of this: ??? a commandment or perhaps, It is because of this: ??? for what practical distinction to include it is covered ??? witnesses If you say, It is because of this: ??? a commandment it is revealed yes. it is covered No. except If you say, It is because of this: ??? Even if it is covered it is of acceptable worth. What then does it mean when it says it was said: Thus said Rabbi Levi No. he said ??? except ??? a commandment Another teaching is like this: ??? it is revealed And there is no meaning to the word ??? it is covered these are the words of ??? Rav Ashi said ??? also ??? where he teaches or in the hour ??? witnesses ??? yes. that did not have ??? No. Learn from this It is because of this: ??? a commandment Learn from this Another teaching ??? it is revealed And there is no meaning to the word ??? it is covered these are the words of ??? R' Yehuda says: It is because of this: ??? We were accustomed they were in the hour of ??? that were bring in it is covered ??? witnesses They posed this difficulty: witnesses for he says ??? and one or perhaps, he and two Come and hear: ??? witnesses If you say, This is satisfactory he and two then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, he and one What then does it mean when it says witnesses ??? in a place ??? And furthermore, he said ??? The Rabbis taught in his place of ??? they were ??? pieces of wood to do ??? to do ??? on Shabbat in his place of R' Yosi the Gallilean they were they eat meat "uf" ??? Levi ??? my heart Joseph ??? for him But the beginning of the teaching, ??? No. he ate When he came before of Rabbi He said to him why is it that No. ??? He said to him ??? with R' Yehudah son of ??? it was. I thought to say perhaps, ??? them like R' Yosi the Gallilean For it was taught in a baraita R' Yosi the Gallilean says it is said (Deut. 14) No. ??? all ??? and it is said (Deut. 14) No. ??? of its mother that he is forbidden It is because of this: ??? is forbidden ??? "uf" that he is forbidden It is because of this: ??? It is possible ??? is forbidden ??? Scripture states: ??? of its mother he has fulfilled his obligation "uf" that do not to him milk if R' Yitzchak said a city One it was ??? that were doing ??? they were the dead ??? and not only this, but ??? One ??? the kingdom of ??? on Israel on ??? and on it the city No. ??? It was taught: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all a commandment ??? upon them ??? For example, ??? As it is written (Ps. 119) ??? I myself on ??? Rav ??? doing it ??? and all a commandment ??? upon them ??? For example, ??? As it is written (Num. 11) "And Moses heard the nation ??? on ??? doing it ??? her ketuba that is not ??? of it ??? It was taught: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says all a commandment ??? Israel ??? upon them ??? in the hour of ??? For example, by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? She ??? in their hands. and all a commandment that did not have ??? Israel ??? upon it ??? in the hour of ??? For example, tefillin ??? She ??? in their hands. for thus said Rabbi ??? tefillin they all require ??? the master of ??? Who is it Abayye said: that did not have he puffs at them." Rava said: that did not have ??? at them." But why? ??? for him Elisha the master of ??? One ??? the kingdom of ??? on Israel for all of they have placed tefillin on his head ??? ??? and it was the case that Elisha places tefillin and went out ??? one ran before Him." and ran after him: immediately arrived opposite him. ??? in his hand He said to him Just as into your hand He said to him: ??? ??? of it ??? For this reason they were ??? that specific the master of ??? what is the difference here, ??? and not He said to him the remainder of ??? It is because of this: ??? Israel ??? as it is said (Ps. 68) ??? By means of money ??? Just as ??? -- this refers to ??? upon it Even Israel the commandments ??? Thus said Rabbi Abba son of Rav ??? R' Yitzchak said One time the forgot and they did not bring ??? from the eve of Sabbath ??? on Shabbat ??? a way ???

דף קל,ב גמרא

that did not have ??? Rav Yosef disagreed that did not have ??? he who permits And if you say that did not have ??? who permits even in the public domain except ??? rabbis ??? a way ??? a way ??? a way courtyards ??? and who Sarai For it was taught: in the same way they do not bring that specific a way ??? thus in the same way yes. bring in that specific No. a way ??? and not a way ??? and not a way courtyards except Rav Ashi said that did not have ??? except ??? Rabbi Shimon For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Shimon says: one ??? and one ??? and one courtyards all of them is a voluntary act one there are. ??? and not ??? in the midst of the house Rabbi brought this very question Zeira ??? that did not have ??? in it What then? ??? who say ??? he is equivalent. Just as a courtyward even though that is not ??? is permitted. ??? This also even though that is not ??? in it is permitted. ??? or perhaps, No. he is equivalent. to courtyard ??? it has four ??? This he does not have four ??? a courtyward it has ??? This is not there? ??? and not He said to him and not something Oftentimes he found ??? and he said R' Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) said It is because of this: R' Yehudah ??? One time the forgot and they did not bring ??? on Shabbat and it was the case that ??? Difficult is to the sages how ??? these are the words of the sages doing ??? one ??? he And furthermore, an individual and many The halacha is ??? and R' Osha'ya said ??? Rabbi Yehudah ??? And he said to me ??? that did not have ??? in it it was. ??? But the beginning of the teaching, for this But the beginning of the teaching, He said to him he reasons, for Master ??? that did not have ??? is permitted. ??? And he said to him: yes. He said to him Hey, isn't it the case that Oftentimes ??? and not is what you say? Do you really mean that? for me thus perhaps, ??? to you ??? He said to him yes. ??? for me ??? it was said: Rabbi Zeira said Rav said ??? that did not have ??? in it yes. ??? in it except ??? cubits Abayye said: this one the validity he said Rabbi Zeira and not ??? until who has arrived Rabbah son of Avuah ??? for he said: Rav ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said ??? that did not have ??? in it ??? courtyards with houses yes. ??? in it except ??? cubits No. ??? courtyards with houses is permitted. ??? He said to him: Rav ??? what is the difference here, For ??? courtyards with houses ??? courtyards ??? houses Rav with his reasoning for he said: Rav yes. ??? until ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.