It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קלד,א גמרא

??? What then does it mean when it says ??? No. ??? est ??? The rabbis taught: items that do not doing ??? on Shabbat doing to it on Yom Tov ??? to it ??? and they tear up to it wine and oil He said to him Abaye According to Rav Yosef what is the difference here, ??? on Yom Tov ??? wine and oil Look, also on Shabbat ??? as it is taught: yes. they tear up wine and oil ??? on Shabbat he said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? It is because of this: ??? Even they tear up wine and oil Thus said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? One time ??? Rabbi Meir ??? to him wine and oil and not ??? to him ??? he said to us despite the fact for I say thus in the same way and my fellow say thus in the same way ??? No. ??? my heart to cross over on these are the words of my fellow he ??? but: ??? the World: Sarai there i.e., in another mishna it does not require there is not in this case. Here in this case, he is required there is not in this case. Here in this case, also, ??? and not to walk we were where he teaches he gives this alone by itself and this before ??? The Rabbis taught yes. ??? ??? are his And there is no meaning to the word ??? that specific ??? He said to him Abaye According to Rav Yosef what is the difference here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita they give An egg ??? of ??? He said to him there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? that specific ??? For it was taught: ??? that specific ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? of ??? here, ??? of wood He said to him Abaye According to Rav Yosef What is the difference ??? He said to him there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? He said to him Abaye According to Rav Yosef What then? ??? He said to him is forbidden What is the difference ??? He said to him there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that They said: ??? the daughter of day ??? thus ??? that even ??? the daughter of day ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make to it ??? Abayye said: he said for me if This ??? before it ??? perhaps, ??? of him and comes to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? Abayye said: This ??? the one who does not have ??? he shall take ??? is what he has ??? for him ??? And Abaye said he said for me if This ??? that is not ??? day in a case ??? two and evening but: in a vessel ??? No. It is because of this: ??? And Abaye said he said for me if This ??? that is not ??? his mouth What then does it mean when it says ??? a cup ??? for him ??? his mouth ??? his mouth ??? And Abaye said he said for me if This ??? that is not ??? And Abaye said he said for me if This ??? that is not ??? And Abaye said he said for me if This ??? ??? and if mighty ones..." ??? And Abaye said he said for me if This ??? No. ??? of him. the blood ??? for him until ??? of him. the blood ??? No. stillborn lit., fallen of him. ??? until ??? of him. ??? as it is taught: Thus said Rabbi he gave One time ??? the sea ??? a woman before a garment he built ??? did he die two did he die the third ??? before ??? that he was ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to it ??? to him until ??? in it ??? to him until ??? in it ??? that specific raw lit., living they were read that specific he gave ??? on my Name for the remainder One time ??? a woman One before a garment he built ??? did he die two did he die the third ??? before ??? that he was ??? in it and not I saw in it blood covenant Watch out for leading vav And I said to it ??? to him until ??? in it ??? to him ??? that specific raw lit., living they were read was his name he gave ??? on my Name

דף קלד,ב משנה

??? ??? between before ??? or whether after ??? upon it in the hand of but not in a vessel ??? son of ??? says ??? ??? on the third day that falls to be on Shabbat as it is said (Gen. 34) And it was on the third day ??? doubt whether ??? yes. ??? upon it the Sabbath And Rabbi Yehudah permits ???

דף קלד,ב גמרא

Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? Rav Yehudah and Rabbah son of Avuah who both say How so? It was taught by ??? ??? between before ??? between after ??? How so? ??? upon it in the hand of but not in a vessel Rabba said: Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: except Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? ??? between before Me ??? between after ??? by day ??? according to his way and on the third day that falls to be on Shabbat ??? upon it in the hand of but not in a vessel ??? son of ??? says ??? ??? on the third day that falls to be on Shabbat as it is said And it was on the third day ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba ??? between before ??? between after ??? by day ??? according to his way and on the third day that falls to be on Shabbat ??? upon it in the hand of ??? son of ??? says ??? ??? on the third day that falls to be on Shabbat And even though there isn't proof for the matter there is an allusion to the matter as it is said And it was on the third day ??? yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? and not in a vessel except in the hand of ??? a Tanna that came first What then does it mean when it says despite the fact there isn't proof for the matter there is an allusion to the matter It is because of this: ??? No. ??? a child ??? of him. ??? This certain individual who has arrived in front of Raba he taught or ruled for him ??? Rava said: I ??? why do I have And they said to him rabbis to Raba For it was taught: ??? He said to them Our mishna ??? From where can you derive ??? Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya says ??? ??? on the third day that falls to be on Shabbat If you say, This is satisfactory a Tanna taught: that came first ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: we were for he says for him ??? son of ??? except If you say, a Tanna taught: that came first ??? by day ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? on the third day This Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya says ??? Even ??? should bring himself When Rav Dimi came Rabbi Eliezer said The halacha is ??? son of ??? are they, of it in the west ??? the entire body or ??? He said to them one of the rabbis And Rabbi Ya'akov ??? the entire body For if it was ??? who ??? atop ??? for he said: Rav yes. ??? and oil from by regarding ??? on Shabbat Rav Yosef disagreed and not two to you between ??? on Shabbat ??? He disagreed with this Rav Dimi And from where do you derive ??? on Shabbat ??? perhaps, ??? on the eve of the Sabbath. ??? Abayye said: I ??? for him ??? and a second person for him Rav Yosef because of ??? he to him it was said: also For he came ??? R' Abahu said R' Elazar said And there are those who say it was R' Abahu said that R' Yochanan said The halacha is ??? son of ??? between ??? on Shabbat between ??? between ??? the entire body between ??? because of ??? She ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav said yes. ??? and oil from by regarding ??? on Shabbat And Shmuel said he gives except ??? and descends ??? They challenged him from this teaching: yes. ??? oil ??? atop ??? to give atop ??? on Shabbat there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? Come and hear: yes. ??? and oil atop ??? for upon regarding ??? on Shabbat there i.e., in another mishna also It is because of this: ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel yes. ??? and oil atop ??? on Shabbat but: ??? except ??? and descends ??? The rabbis taught: ??? atop ??? but not ??? and not ??? it is a problem ??? There is no difficulty. this one In the case where it was new. this one ??? Abayye said: Learn from this Behold! ??? doubt whether ??? The rabbis taught: (Lev. 12) ??? certainly ??? the Sabbath

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.