It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קמד,א גמרא

that did not have ??? tahor He said to them: ??? I ??? for healing tamei ??? for healing tahor They said to him: ??? and grapes ??? from them ??? that did not have ??? Is this not ??? for him that did not have ??? for just as ??? and grapes ??? that did not have ??? and not anything ??? and pomegranates ??? My son, ??? not all the more so? No. ??? that did not have ??? for he said: No. it's settled. for me And if you wish, I would say that I ??? and grapes an invalid intention regarding that which is to be destroyed, they stand from the beginning ??? them ??? R' Yehudah ??? According to the sages, ??? rabbis ??? for him to Rabbi Yehudah in the remainder of fruits From where do we derive this? as it is taught: ???

דף קמד,ב גמרא

??? but not ??? and of the house of ??? son of ??? they were ??? And from where do you derive is a law established by the Rabbis She perhaps, it is Rabbi Yehudah ??? also R' Yehudah I will say ??? for him according to R' Yehudah they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? who ??? for him Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say immediately ??? My son, ??? even ??? even you say rabbis immediately ??? My son, ??? even ??? Learn from this It is the rabbis' position Learn from this of the house of ??? son of ??? they were ??? Rav Nachman said The halacha is ??? the house of ??? son of ??? Raba said to him for Rav, ??? son of ??? a Tanna taught: he And if you say The halacha is For This a Tanna taught: ??? to it ??? son of ??? but on account of ??? son of ??? The halacha is are like him ??? son of ??? you shall ??? of the world yes. For it was taught in a baraita ??? Rabbi Eliezer says and that which was sanctified for Temple use but the sages say he does not make kiddush. except a thing ??? and Rabbi Chanina said: What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Eliezer which provides ??? fields ??? something ??? place Here in this case, nullification ??? next to every person except we were The reason is Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? for he said: Rav Chisda ??? invalidate it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not My son, ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say immediately ??? it was. them ??? So, here, immediately ??? it was. them ??? Rav Papa said, It is because of this: that there is a thing that do not doing from him ??? and any thing thing that do not doing from him ??? invalidates it ??? It was taught there: stillborn lit., fallen to its midst wine or vinegar ??? he sleeps ??? is invalid, Which Tanna taught: ??? he Abayye said: Rabbi Ya'akov She as it is taught: R' Ya'akov says ??? Behold! he ??? and What is the reason? And they said ??? that is coming out at the beginning tahor on account of that is not ??? Rabbi Shimon says: ??? he does not ??? and What is the reason? And they said ??? that is coming out ??? the house of ??? tamei on account of where it is not possible to him without ??? oil What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? according to ??? Rava said: It is because of this: that there is a thing that do not doing from him ??? and invalidates it ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? a person ??? of grapes ??? but not ??? Rav Chisdah said in words of our rabbi, ??? a person ??? but not ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? that comes ??? he eats he He challenged this "He" meaning... pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama One suffering from gonorrhea ??? ??? tamei And if you say ??? that comes ??? he eats he in what way ??? Like that which was said by R' Yochanan ??? Here in this case, also, ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Ravina tamei did he die ??? and grapes

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.