It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קנג,א גמרא

??? an elevation-offering and for the remainder It is not ??? Rav Yehudah said the son of of Rav Shmuel son of ??? in the name of Rav ??? of a person ??? if son of ??? he or not. Really? For didn't for him say Rav for Rav, Shmuel son of ??? for in that place ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? for him ??? this one ??? for him and not ??? He said to him Abaye ??? For example, Master, ??? for him all of them ??? one ??? He said to him ??? and Rabbah son of Rav ??? from him asked Rabbi Eliezer ??? Who is son of ??? He said to him (Is. 30) ??? a thing ??? saying: this ??? Let them go in it For ??? And so ??? R' Chaninah he said all ??? from him (Ecc. 12) ??? My son, ??? They said: One who acts items before ??? My son, Yehudah They said: One who acts items after ??? and does not disagree Master, For ??? Master, For ??? It was taught there: Rabbi Eliezer says: for the remainder one day before ??? They asked ??? ??? And so a person know Who is day ??? He said to them: and all the more so ??? the day lest ??? tomorrow and it is found all his days ??? And even Solomon he said in his wisdom (Ecc. 9) in all a time ??? to the children and oil on your head! to ??? that R' Yochanan said son of ??? is from that which is belonging to of the king ??? ??? and not fixed to them time ??? regarding them ??? ??? on he opens the house of the king And they said anything lacking ??? the king ??? regarding them ??? And they said anything there are a meal without a burden ??? the king ??? regarding them they would enter before him ??? they would enter before him ??? rejoices the king to greet ??? to greet ??? he said ??? ??? that did not have ??? Watch out for leading vav And they stood --- and they shall fear ??? of ??? It is because of this: ??? he said Even there are. can be seen ??? except both these and these: they sit ??? they eat ??? they drink ??? as it is said (Is. 65) Thus he said Hashem there are my slave ??? and you ??? there are my slave ??? and you ??? there are my slave ??? heart and you ??? heart Another explanation: in all a time ??? to the children these fringes, and oil on your head! to ??? these tefillin

דף קנג,א משנה

who ??? on the way he gives ??? to a gentile and if yes. with it a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? on a donkey they come to courtyard ??? take the vessels ??? on Shabbat and those that are not ??? on Shabbat permits ???

דף קנג,א גמרא

What is the reason? ??? for him rabbis ??? to a gentile ??? the sages, ??? a person ??? himself on ??? If it was No. ??? for him will come ??? four cubits in the public domain Rabba said: ??? but: a lost object No. This is obvious! ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What would you have said? it is the law even a lost object and This case where he teaches ??? The tanna teaches: Come and learn from this. They did not say that except in a case that is not will come ??? but: will come ??? he is equivalent. that it is possible that they said he is required Raba a lost object ??? What then? immediately who has arrived ??? he is equivalent. or perhaps, immediately that is not ??? of it Is this not ??? he is equivalent. ??? yes. with it ??? The reason is ??? with it a stranger i.e., a non-Jew this one there are with it a stranger i.e., a non-Jew to a gentile he will give for him What is the reason? a donkey you ??? on ??? a stranger i.e., a non-Jew If it was you ??? on ??? a donkey A deaf person a mute and a child ??? he would place for him ??? a mute and a child No. he will give for him What is the reason מאי טעמא Behold! a person This Is this not a person A deaf person and a mute ??? a mute and a child ??? They posed this difficulty: A deaf person and a child What then does it mean when it says who follow the reasoning ??? ??? No. ??? to you as it is taught: R' Isaac says It is because of this: R' Eliezer terumah of A deaf person

דף קנג,ב גמרא

No. ??? because it was doubt whether For ??? to you who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis For it was taught in a baraita five No. ??? and if ??? yes. ??? terumah These are A deaf person a mute and a child ??? that is not are his a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? of Israel even ??? yes. its terumah terumah What then does it mean when it says ??? he will give for him ??? will come ??? the understanding of or perhaps, ??? he will give for him ??? will come ??? that it is possible that they said ??? he will give for him that it is possible that they said ??? he will give for him there is not there No. a stranger i.e., a non-Jew and not a donkey and not A deaf person and not a mute and not a child What then does it mean when it says Rabbi Yitzchak said any more ??? it was and not ??? the sages ??? What then does it mean when it says any more ??? it was ??? less than less than ??? cubits why is it that No. ??? the sages ??? It is because of this: (Prov. 25) honor God ??? a thing and honor." kings ??? a thing and here in this other case, What then does it mean when it says honor God that it is possible perhaps, will come to include four cubits in the public domain It was taught: Rabbi Eliezer says on that very day ??? R' Yehoshua says on that very day ??? It was taught: is from that which is belonging to ??? For what reason The matter is comparable ??? a person he gives to its midst ??? but it ??? is from that which is belonging to of R' Yehoshua For what reason The matter is comparable ??? honey he gives to its midst ??? and nuts but it ??? Mar said: yes. with it a stranger i.e., a non-Jew ??? on a donkey Is it not the case that ??? and the Merciful One he said (Ex. 20) No. shall you do all work Thus said Rabbi ??? son of love ??? upon it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it would be impossible that is not ??? water ??? and there are ??? upon it ??? is standing ??? If so, even his fellow also Rav Pappa said: all ??? he is liable A sin-offering about his friend is exempt but: is forbidden all ??? is exempt but: is forbidden ??? is permitted. initially Thus said Rabbi ??? son of love it was ??? to him on ??? ran underneath it until ??? to his house ??? ran but: ??? No. What is the reason? immediately the one who does not have ??? will come ??? the end of the end of For it arrived ??? it would be impossible that is not he arises ??? for the domain the public ??? he sprinkled the blood, for him ??? a hand he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? after his animal on Shabbat in error he is liable A sin-offering with intent he is liable stoning What is the reason? Rabba said: For scripture said: No. shall you do all work you ??? his animal is equivalent that are his Just as he in error he is liable A sin-offering with intent he is liable stoning Even his animal also in error he is liable A sin-offering with intent he is liable stoning Rabba said: two ??? In the matter one As it is written (Num. 15) Torah One it shall be to you ??? who shall you do in the hand of ??? all the Torah All of it ??? Just as idolatry that He performs It once happened ??? So, here, until that He performs It once happened ??? And furthermore, We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? the Sabbath In the matter ??? on ??? A sin-offering and on One who intentionally violates it stoning from this general principle it would follow That there are something ??? they are obligated on ??? A sin-offering and not on One who intentionally violates it stoning And what does it mean when it says ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.