It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קנד,א גמרא

Rav ??? he would say over Thus said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? after livestock on Shabbat in error he is not liable A sin-offering with intent he is liable stoning He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba ??? the Sabbath In the matter ??? on ??? A sin-offering they are obligated on One who intentionally violates it stoning this one yes. they are obligated on ??? A sin-offering yes. they are obligated on One who intentionally violates it stoning who The tanna teaches: this one yes. they are obligated etc. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: a thing ??? on ??? A sin-offering they are obligated on One who intentionally violates it stoning and there are a thing that do not they are obligated on ??? A sin-offering and they are obligated on One who intentionally violates it stoning And what does it mean when it says ??? Raba the brother of Rav ??? son of Rachel And there are those who say it was Avuah of Rav ??? son of Rachel to the teaching that was last it is a problem this one of Rav ??? for Rav, ??? son of Rachel ??? perhaps, two ??? son of Rachel are they, it was. he would say over to it about this teaching ??? in the name of Rabbi Yochanan ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? after his animal on Shabbat is exempt ??? in error No. he is obligated A sin-offering ??? all the Torah All of it ??? with intent also No. ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? the Sabbath In the matter ??? on ??? A sin-offering and on One who intentionally violates it stoning this one yes. they are obligated on ??? A sin-offering yes. they are obligated on One who intentionally violates it stoning ??? also No. ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not ??? a court בית דין and all Is this not ??? a court בית דין yes. ??? upon it

דף קנד,ב גמרא

And even if ??? the Merciful One No. shall you do all work ??? you why do I have he ??? his animal No. ??? they come to courtyard ??? Rav Huna said it was his animal require implements of glass sends ??? underneath it permits ??? fall ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: take the vessels ??? on Shabbat and thus he comes to say Rav Huna ??? that is not ??? for him And then it happened that nullify implements of ??? They challenged him from this teaching: it was his animal require he immersed ??? permits ??? And even though ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? also where he teaches is equivalent ??? Just as he immersed that is not Look, for him So, too, here in this case, also, No. Look, for him And what does it mean when it says despite the fact ??? What would you have said? ??? also ??? Come and learn from this. It was taught: Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai says it was his animal require ??? of ??? his head underneath it ??? after This is only in the case ??? upon it. ??? of Rabban Gamliel it was require honey and not running ??? until the evening after Shabbat ??? Sabbath ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: take vessels ??? for what Look, ??? ??? and he shall place ??? implements of ??? life, his reasoning is ??? life, is a law established by the Rabbis Abaye he found for him ??? that he came ??? for him ??? of wine He said to him ??? he makes use Master, ??? life, He said to him ??? there are. ??? No. ??? in them? rabbis ??? For it was taught in a baraita permits ??? Is this not ??? where they did them ??? No. ??? in them? rabbis No. ??? that is not are they, ??? So, too, ??? two by human hands and one by a tree is valid but we do not go up to it on Yom Tov Is this not ??? of him. by a tree where they did them ??? are forbidden No. ??? for trees and placed thatched roof ??? by a tree ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, three by human hands and one by a tree is valid and we do go up to it on Yom Tov and if ??? for trees why is it that we do go up to it on Yom Tov and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? are forbidden the end of the end of why is it that we do go up to it on Yom Tov except there i.e., in another mishna ??? the wall in reality he ??? also where he teaches This is the general rule: all Watch out for leading vav !! And even where one removes ??? the tree and it is possible to stand we do go up to it on Yom Tov Learn from this Let us say, ??? we do not go up to it on Yom Tov ??? says It is because of this: ??? we do go up to it on Yom Tov Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? are forbidden and one master reasons that are permitted Abayye said: No. ??? are forbidden and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about ??? are forbidden ??? are permitted Rava said: one ??? also ??? one who permits ??? Sarai also ??? Rav ??? to Raba ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.