It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כו,א גמרא

Let us say, Master, because it was ??? one And furthermore, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one because it was ??? And furthermore, ??? lest ??? from him this particular ??? to it ??? he said to it ??? For ??? he said to it ??? a lamp ??? a lamp ??? of it ??? (Jer. 52) ??? the land ??? Rav ??? Rav Yosef learned: these ??? a summary of ??? and until ??? these ??? of rock and until ??? The Rabbis taught we do not kindle ??? tamei ??? and it is not necessary to say on Shabbat one like it; we do not kindle with naphtha ??? and it is not necessary to say on Shabbat This is satisfactory ??? because it was ??? but: he immersed tamei What is the reason? Scripture states: (in Numbers 18) and as for me, there are I have given to you ??? is what the scripture says. One terumah that is tahor and one terumah that is tamei Just as terumah that is tahor yes. to you of it except ??? Even terumah that is tamei yes. to you of it except ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says we do not kindle ??? and thus he was Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says those who trouble me; he does not except ??? R' Yishmael says all that comes from the tree we do not kindle in it R' Yishmael son of ??? says we do not kindle except ??? from ??? R' Tarfon says we do not kindle except with olive oil only. he stood Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? on his feet and he said Just as ??? the men of ??? that do not to them except oil sesame for just as ??? the men of ??? that do not to them except oil nuts for just as ??? the men of ??? that do not to them except oil radishes for just as ??? the men of ??? that do not to them No. thus in the same way and not thus in the same way except ??? except yes. to you except Just as where they said the sages we do not kindle ??? with oil fish and with tar Rabbi Shimon ??? says ??? with oil gourds and with naphtha ??? says all that comes from ??? we do not kindle in it except with oil fish ??? we were a Tanna taught: that came first There is this difference between them: For Rav Bruna Rav said and not ??? It was taught: Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says all that comes from the tree yes. in it It is because of this: three on three ??? in it except ??? Abayye said:

דף כו,ב גמרא

R' Shimon son of ??? and it was taught of the academy of R' Yishmael And they said a thing one R' Shimon son of ??? this one of which we were speaking? a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael Who is it for it was taught in the academy of R' Yishmael Because ??? garments in the Torah ??? and creates an exclusion to you the scripture on the first from them wool ??? Just as there wool ??? Even all wool ??? Rava said: three on three in the remainder of garments There is this difference between them: For R' Shimon son of ??? it has a Tanna of the academy of R' Yishmael he does not have everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world Regardless, three on three ??? From where do we derive this? as it is taught: ??? yes. for me except ??? three on three from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 13) and a cloth and so go ahead and say ??? three on three Is this not is a kal vachomer he now two and evening ??? three on three ??? If so, three on three also he shall take ??? except three on three ??? between ??? between ??? will come ??? three on three ??? he ??? No. ??? No. will come ??? The reason is ??? he read this one No. ??? he read No. we complete it ??? and so go ahead and say ??? three on three in the remainder of garments Scripture states: (Lev. 13) ??? wool ??? wool ??? yes. something ??? No. and so go ahead and say For ??? on three but: three on three ??? two ??? are written (Lev. 13) ??? wool or ??? one ??? on three and one ??? from three on three and to Raba for he said: three on three in the remainder of garments There is this difference between them: ??? it has a Tanna of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael he does not have three on three in the remainder of garments

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.