Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף כז,א גמרא
??? for him ??? (Lev. 11) ??? as it is taught: ??? yes. for me except ??? three on three in the remainder of garments ??? Scripture states: or ??? and Abaye This or ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? three on three ??? and Raba ??? the Merciful One regarding leprous plague and it is the law ??? and Abaye that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides two and evening become tamei at them." And the other one Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that leprous plague ??? let the Merciful One write in the Torah regarding ??? leprous plague ??? And the other one leprous plague ??? No. they came That there are ??? Just as ??? which provides become tamei ??? Abayye said: This It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, ??? a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael for it was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael ??? yes. for me except ??? wool ??? wool ??? and wool ??? of ??? Therefore, scripture states: or ??? Rava said: For he does not have ??? It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, in the remainder of garments three on three three on three it has Hey, isn't it the case that Raba he for he said: three on three in the remainder of garments ??? it has a Tanna of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael he does not have he returns of him. Raba ??? And if you wish, I could say this one Rav ??? he said Rav Papa said, Even all to include ??? clearly and explicitly are written of him. (Deut. 22) No. ??? wool ??? I thought to say that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי a way ??? but: ??? all two varieties of is forbidden Is this not is a kal vachomer he for just as ??? that he came ??? the entire ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? wool ??? yes. something other than this No. ??? not all the more so? except of Rav ??? She Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said Even all
דף כז,ב גמרא
to include fringes, fringes, clearly and explicitly it is written (Deut. 22) No. ??? wool ??? and then it is written (Deut. 22) ??? shall you do to you For it might have entered your mind that I would say: ??? of Raba pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Num. 15) "the corner ??? and then it is written wool ??? How so? wool ??? between ??? between that did not have ??? the remainder of sectarians. ??? that did not have ??? yes. ??? Come and learn from this. Rav Acha said the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi a Tanna of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael what is the difference here, in the matter of ??? the remainder of garments As it is written or ??? Here in this case, also, Let us say, ??? the remainder of garments ??? of it This certain individual to include ??? he who has arrived as it is taught: and you shall look they came creates an exclusion ??? night You say creates an exclusion ??? night Or perhaps, except creates an exclusion ??? For as it says: who ??? of it Behold! ??? say So how am I to resolve that and you shall look they came creates an exclusion ??? night for just as you see ??? and to discharge the mitzvah ??? night ??? I ??? next to others and sends forth I ??? night that is not ??? next to others and so go ahead and say ??? the remainder of garments ??? he arises ??? wool ??? he arises ??? the remainder of ??? Abayye said: Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer ??? And they said a thing one ??? this one of which we were speaking? ??? as it is taught: ??? says ??? is invalid because of ??? like who For This a Tanna taught: For it was taught in a baraita two and evening become tamei ??? immediately these are the words of Rabbi Meir and Rabbi Yehudah says ??? the evening immediately ??? of flax ???
דף כז,ב משנה
all that comes from the tree we do not kindle with it except flax and all that comes from the tree does not become tamei from the tumah of tents except flax
דף כז,ב גמרא
From where do we derive this? ??? wood Mar Zutra said: For scripture said: (Josh. 2) but it ??? but that which is coming out from the tree he does not become tamei the tumah of tents except ??? From where do we derive this? Rabbi Eliezer said ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.