It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

??? that at the beginning of the teaching is exempt and it is permitted No. The tanna teaches: except ??? this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper but: is forbidden it is a problem who ??? Sabbath is exempt and it is permitted For didn't Shmuel say all ??? is exempt but: is forbidden son of from those three this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper and it is permitted ??? a deer ??? a snake ??? For It is necessary to teach this for him ??? that he came does he act? It once happened ??? that is not ??? does he act? It once happened that it is possible ??? In any case, both ??? there shall be ??? in them? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? A sin-offering ??? He accounts for that is not will come in them? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? A sin-offering No. ??? He accounts for ??? are exempt Hey, isn't it the case that ??? work ??? It was taught: R' says (Lev. 4) ??? the land ??? One who makes All of it and not One who makes ??? an individual One who acts it he is liable two "and they shall make it are exempt it was said: also said Rabbi Chiyya son of ??? And they said ??? an individual that was made he is liable two ??? he is required of him Rav ??? his fellow they eat ??? outwards What then? ??? valued him, and from its place he is equivalent. ??? or perhaps, No. He said to him he is liable and does not ??? What is the reason? ??? No. ???

דף ג,ב גמרא

He said to him R' Chiyya for Rav, son of ??? No. I thought to say to you For he arises Rabbi In this case, ??? No. ??? perhaps, Is this not ??? For if it was Is this not of Rabbi a person Rabbah he ??? to you ??? he now Regardless, then the ruling is acceptable. ??? to you as it is taught: he was required they eat ??? while it is still day ??? outwards ??? he is liable on account of that is not ??? Abayye said: This is obvious! for me ??? of a person It is not No. ??? and not ??? No. is comparable ??? for he answered ??? No. is comparable ??? he is required Abaye ??? of a person What then? ??? who ??? rabbis ??? or No. Come and hear: it was ??? fruits and he took it out outwards One teaching is forbidden to return it It was taught by Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one is permitted. to return it Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? is comparable ??? Is this not ??? is comparable No. ??? is comparable And there is no difficulty. here, to the bottom for the ten here, is more for the ten And if you wish, I would say This and this to the bottom for the ten Is this not ??? is comparable And there is no difficulty. here, while it is still day here, ??? while it is still day No. ??? rabbis ??? rabbis ??? while it is still day For if it was my field for him No. will come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? A sin-offering ??? rabbis ??? For if it was my field for him will come in them? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? A sin-offering No. ??? rabbis ??? thus ??? of Rav ??? son of Abaye who seeks Rav Bibi son of Abaye ??? bread ??? they permitted to him ??? before ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? A sin-offering or they did not permit ??? that is not they permitted This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world No. ??? And there is no difficulty. here, in error here, with intent in error No. ??? rabbis with intent ??? rabbis And if you wish, I would say This and this in error and here in this other case, ??? because ??? what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? because ??? and one master reasons that No. ??? because ??? And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world No. ??? And there is no difficulty. here, ??? a courtyward

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.