It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לז,א גמרא

In reality lit: In the world I would say to you to turn We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? seek and in a ball we make him repeat upon it cooked food ??? He does not return until ??? or until that one give ??? but: ??? despite the fact that is not ??? and does not ??? for just as there are. ??? The academy of Shammai say: ??? but not cooked food but the academy of Hillel say: ??? that they said to you Is this not the words of all are She except It is a disagreement the academy of Shammai and the academy of Hillel ??? say ??? and not we make him repeat but the academy of Hillel say: Even we make him repeat Come and hear: for he said: R' ??? Thus said Rabbi Chama son of ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except on ??? but: to its midst is forbidden If you say, This is satisfactory to turn We have learnt in a Mishna: we were ??? between ??? except If you say, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from on ??? Who deduces R' ??? He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he arises ??? he arises but the academy of Hillel say: Even we make him repeat and he said R' ??? Rav said Chama son of ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except on ??? but: ??? is forbidden Come and hear: two ??? One ??? and one that is not ??? It is not ??? atop ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? on that is not ??? It is not ??? for just as there are. ??? The academy of Shammai say: and not anything but the academy of Hillel say: ??? but not cooked food He uprooted the words of all are He does not return these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yehudah says The academy of Shammai say: ??? but not cooked food but the academy of Hillel say: ??? The academy of Shammai say: ??? but not we make him repeat but the academy of Hillel say: Even we make him repeat If you say, This is satisfactory ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah except If you say, to turn We have learnt in a Mishna: Our mishna with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi Yehudah and not R' Meir If it was Rabbi Meir it is a problem to the academy of Shammai ??? and to the academy of Hillel ??? If it was Rabbi Yehudah it is a problem ??? In reality lit: In the world I would say to you to turn We have learnt in a Mishna: and it was taught ??? derive it like Rabbi Yehudah ??? upon it ??? derive it like Rabbi Yehudah ??? and we make him repeat ??? upon it ??? For this a Tanna taught: ??? reasoned ??? and even though that is not ??? And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? also ??? yes. If it was No. No. They posed this difficulty: What then? to make adjacent of it ??? is forbidden but: to make adjacent of it it is of acceptable worth. or perhaps, there is no difference Come and hear: two ??? One ??? and one that is not ??? atop ??? Even though it will be that he came ??? for him ??? perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? of it ??? Come and hear: for he said: Rav ??? Rav said Chiyya ??? to it ??? upon it ??? from it and we make him repeat to it Learn from this to make adjacent also ??? yes. No. ??? No. ??? from it where he teaches ??? yes. No. ??? No. except a Tanna taught: ??? It is because of this: we make him repeat Here in this case, also, a Tanna taught: ??? It is because of this: ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? and we make him repeat it is dealing with a case where there is only one. a place he a Tanna taught: ??? It is because of this: we make him repeat except Here in this case, ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. a place he ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. a place he What then do we do about it? Come and hear: ??? to it And there is no meaning to the word ??? unless it is ??? or ??? upon it ??? of flax that are small Behold! She ??? he said R' Isaac son of Nachmeni R' Osha'ya said ??? upon it ??? all ??? all ???

דף לז,ב גמרא

Learn from this ??? proper to him is permitted. that I Here in this case, ??? If so, what is there to say? ??? for him What would you have said? immediately ??? to it ??? the first Come and hear from this. Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? upon it ??? all ??? all ??? And even if ??? of ??? Learn from this ??? proper to him is permitted. that I Here in this case, ??? If so, what is there to say? ??? for him we were ??? of ??? for him Rav Sheshet said R' Yochanan said: ??? upon it ??? that did not have ??? all ??? that did not have ??? all ??? He uprooted He does not return until ??? or until that one give ??? his reasoning is Our mishna to turn We have learnt in a Mishna: but: ??? despite the fact that is not ??? and does not ??? Rabba said: ??? yes. ??? the bread in the midst of the oven with ??? and not ??? atop ??? except so that ??? this one ??? Sarai to turn also ??? the academy of Hillel say: Even we make him repeat and Up to this point, No. ??? the academy of Hillel except ??? but: ??? No. and Rav Sheishet also ??? Come and learn from this. Rav said Shmuel son of Yehudah Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? upon it cooked food ??? all ??? all ??? And even if ??? proper to him He said to him: This certain individual According to Rabbinic law, for Rav, Shmuel son of Yehudah this one Rav And for Shmuel that they said ??? proper to him is forbidden He said to him: because ??? I know for he said: Rav Yosef said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? proper to him is forbidden For ??? to you to Rabbi Yochanan ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi You ??? for Rav, And for Shmuel ??? And for Shmuel We ??? like Rabbi Yochanan Abaye said to him: According to Rav Yosef What then? ??? He said to him: this one Rav Yehudah a smidge lit: a whatever for him ??? He said to him son of of him of Rav Yehudah ??? he even on Shabbat also Sarai ??? for him for me to you What then does it mean when it says He said to him: in Sura, a smidge lit: a whatever for it is the case that Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak ??? it was. and a smidge lit: a whatever for him ??? Rav Ashi said in the presence For Rav Huna ??? for him a cup ??? he ate and not ??? If it was It is because of this: that thus reasoned ??? proper to him is permitted. If it was It is because of this: ??? that there is in it: ??? evil" to him he Rav Nachman said ??? proper to him is forbidden ??? evil" to him is permitted. ??? all that there is in it: ??? evil" to him for there to be wheat ??? that even for the sake of that there is in it: ??? proper to him he and what case is he dealing with? that there is in it: ??? but: is not there? ??? evil" to him he And so is in it ??? also They did not say that except in a case that is not ??? to it ??? but: ??? to it ??? evil" to him ??? and dates. ??? evil" to them They asked of him to Rabbi Chiyya: son of Abba

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.