It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לח,א גמרא

forgot ??? atop ??? on Shabbat What then? He was silent. and not He said to him and not something tomorrow ??? them ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat and there is no difference What then does it mean when it says and They did not teach this לא שנו Rabbah and Rav Yosef; that they said ??? he that he came does he act? It once happened with intent does not eat but: This that is not ??? does he act? It once happened with intent also shall eat Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said ??? he that is not will come ??? in error shall eat but: This ??? in error also does not eat They challenged him from this teaching: forgot ??? atop ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat In what matters are we saying this? ??? that did not have ??? all ??? that did not have ??? all ??? but: ??? all ??? all ??? between in error between with intent shall eat These are the words of Rabbi Meir. R' Yehuda says: ??? all ??? are permitted because of ??? evil" to him ??? all ??? is forbidden because of ??? proper to him and all ??? proper to him For example, ??? meat ??? is forbidden and all ??? evil" to him is permitted. The tanna teaches: from this cooked food that did not have ??? all ??? This is satisfactory to Rav Nachman bar Yizchak There is no difficulty. here, before ??? here, after ??? except Rabbah and Rav Yosef; that they said ??? If it was before ??? it is a problem ??? If it was after ??? it is a problem also ??? it is a problem What then does it mean when it says ??? for he said: Rav Yehudah son of Shmuel Thus said Rabbi Abba Rav said ??? Rav said ??? they would say ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat ??? with intent and say ??? do we they returned ??? on ??? it is a problem For R' ??? it is a problem with R' Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? for Rabbi Meir against Rabbi Meir There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one once it has been done with R' Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? also There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? They posed this difficulty: he crossed ??? What then does it mean when it says who ??? rabbis or No. Come and hear: for Shmuel said: son of he gave Rabbi Chanina said: ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? he found ??? atop ??? and not ??? to them ??? atop ??? to them Is this not to that very Sabbath No. to Shabbat ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? proper to them ??? yes. for he said: Rav Chama son of ??? One time ??? I And Rabbi to the place one and they brought before us ??? from them ??? The academy of Hillel say Even ??? Rav Sheshet said according to the words of One who says

דף לח,ב גמרא

we make him repeat even on Shabbat And even R' Oshaia reasoned Even we make him repeat Even if on Shabbat for thus said Rabbi ??? One time we were are rising. ??? Chiyya Rabbah ??? to him ??? of ??? the lower one ??? the upper one ??? to him the cup ??? to his place and did not say to us a thing Thus said Rabbi Zerika Thus said Rabbi Abba Thus said Rabbi ??? They did not teach such a ruling except ??? in his hand but: ??? atop על גבי ??? is forbidden Rav Ami said R' ??? he ??? except thus said Rabbi Chiyya that R' Yochanan said even ??? atop ??? is permitted. They disagreed about this, Rav Dimi and Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah both of them. in the name of Rabbi ??? They said: One says ??? in his hand is permitted. atop על גבי ??? is forbidden and one says ??? atop ??? also is permitted. he said ??? in the name ??? That which you said, ??? in his hand is permitted. They did not say that except in a case whose knowledge to turn but: yes. ??? to turn is forbidden from this general principle it would follow ??? regarding ??? despite the fact whose knowledge to turn is forbidden that it is possible that they said he said ??? in the name ??? That which you said, atop ??? is forbidden They did not say that except in a case that his attention is not to turn but: ??? to turn is permitted. from this general principle it would follow ??? in his hand despite the fact that his attention is not to turn is permitted. he is required R' ??? What then? ??? atop a bed What then? he is required Rav Ashi ??? What then? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף לח,ב משנה

an oven ??? seek and in a ball They do not give it between ??? between from by ??? seek and in a ball behold! This is הרי זה ??? Behold! he ???

דף לח,ב גמרא

an oven ??? reasoned Rav Yosef to say ??? actually and really atop it atop it actually and really but: to make adjacent it is of acceptable worth. ??? Abaye ??? seek and in a ball Behold! he ??? Behold! he ??? is forbidden this one ??? Sarai with what are we dealing? Shall I say atop it and in what way Shall I say ??? except ??? For It is not ??? atop it who Sarai except Is this not to make adjacent And we have learned Behold! he ??? Rav Adda bar Ahava said Here in this case, ??? and an oven ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) Behold! he ??? atop it is forbidden For if it was ??? For ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? This teaching is consistent with the position ??? an oven ??? seek and in a ball yes. ??? to him and it is not necessary to say atop it and it is not necessary to say to its midst and it is not necessary to say ??? seek and in a ball ??? to him And there is no meaning to the word ??? atop it ??? yes. ??? to him He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi This ??? How so? If it was ??? he is equivalent. even ??? also If it was ??? he is equivalent. even seek and in a ball also did not say to him ??? How so? ??? How so? ??? R' Yosi said son of ??? a place ??? One ??? a place ??? two ??? Abayye said: (and there are those who say Rabbi ??? Even We also ??? that is tahor ??? that is tamei ??? between ??? between ??? tahor

דף לח,ב משנה

yes. ??? An egg beside ??? on account of ??? and not ??? and Rabbi Yosei, permits and not ??? or with dust the road. on account of ??? It once happened ??? the men of ??? and they brought ??? of ??? cubits of ??? And they said to them the sages if on Shabbat ??? on Shabbat are forbidden ??? if on Yom Tov ??? on Yom Tov are forbidden ??? and are permitted ???

דף לח,ב גמרא

They posed this difficulty: ??? What then does it mean when it says Rav Yosef said ??? he is liable A sin-offering Mar said: the son of of Ravina Even We also ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.