It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

is permitted. This comes to imply of Shmuel like Rabbi Shimon he reasons for himself. For didn't Shmuel say ??? of ??? in the public domain on account of that did not have ??? of it many but not ??? of wood And if it enters your mind to argue that derive it like Rabbi Shimon even of wood also In the matter that do not ??? derive it like Rabbi Shimon ??? that is not it requires ??? derive it like Rabbi Yehudah Ravina said Therefore, ??? in a public domain ??? less than less than ??? cubits ??? even ??? but: he gives ??? The Rabbis taught he gives a person ??? and not ??? these are the words of the academy of Shammai but the academy of Hillel say: between ??? or whether ??? is permitted. In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: ??? and not ??? and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Rav Nachman said Watch out for leading vav the halacha is like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? reasoned Rav Yosef to say ??? Behold! he ??? He said to him Abaye It was taught by R' Chiyya ??? he does not ??? and for what ??? with the intent from the beginning ??? Behold! he ??? And Rav Nachman says The halacha is like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? except on Shabbat ??? there is not in this case. Who deduces Rabbi Shimon ??? he arises He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he arises and the academy of Hillel permit between ??? or whether ??? and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Let us say, Rabbi Shimon son of ??? for he said: like the academy of Shammai thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel In the matter this Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua I saw for him to Raba that is not ??? Rabbi Chiyya he gives a person he spit it of water ??? of water between ??? or whether ??? He said to him: Rav Huna to Rav Ashi perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? implements of He said to him: ??? it was said: ??? a person he spit it of water ??? of water between ??? between ??? hot foods

דף מב,א משנה

??? They do not give it into their midst ???

דף מב,ב משנה

but: he gives he ??? or ??? Rabbi Yehudah says for all he he gives except ??? in which there is in it vinegar and brine

דף מב,ב גמרא

They posed this difficulty: Rabbi Yehudah He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he arises ??? or perhaps, ??? he arises ??? Come and hear: as it is taught: Rabbi Yehudah says for all ??? he he gives for all ??? he he gives except ??? in which there is in it vinegar and brine reasoned Rav Yosef to say salt Behold! he ??? and in a vessel two No. ??? He said to him Abaye Rabbi Chiyya taught salt It is not ??? two also ??? and disagrees of Rav ??? for he said: Rav ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements ??? and there are that they said reasoned Rav Yosef to say salt Behold! he ??? in a vessel two No. ??? He said to him Abaye It was taught by R' Chiyya salt It is not ??? also No. ??? And this is like the position for he said: Rav ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements ???

דף מב,ב משנה

yes. ??? implements of under the lamp ??? in it the oil and if ??? while it is still day is permitted. And there is no meaning to the word ??? from him on account of that is not from ???

דף מב,ב גמרא

Rav Chisdah said despite the fact where they said yes. ??? implements of under ??? but: ??? upon it implements of that did not have ??? Rabbah said What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav Chisda his reasoning is ??? in the dunghill It is not ??? in a place ??? they permitted ??? that is not ??? they did not permit ??? Abaye ??? that is not ??? they did not permit For it was taught: ??? to him ??? of he immersed on top of lit. on the head of ??? sends implements of ??? underneath it ??? that is new ??? implements of under the lamp ??? also ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.