It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מג,א גמרא

??? on the lamp that did not have ??? in them? ??? and thus ??? it ??? the mattress ??? that is new ??? implements of under ??? on Shabbat ??? that is new ??? Rav Yosef said: we were The reason is of Rav Chisda It is because of this: that he came nullify implements of ??? Abaye ??? of he immersed ??? sends implements of after ??? underneath it He said to him he immersed ??? he next to Sabbath ??? he crossed ??? implements of under the lamp ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? the son of of Rav Joshua ??? They do not have actually and really and thus ??? it ??? or ??? the mattress ??? So if he wished, ??? for him ??? implements of under ??? on Shabbat ??? ??? before ??? and they descend his reasoning is is permitted. ??? For it was taught: is forbidden ??? upon it For it was taught: despite the fact that do not ??? upon it is forbidden R' Abahu said ??? upon it all between ??? to among ??? day R' Yitzchak said in the same way that do not ??? implements of under ??? thus in the same way yes. ??? upon it implements of on account of that did not have ??? his reasoning is yes. implements of was taken except for a matter of ??? on Shabbat They challenged him from this teaching: all Behold! ??? and a second person ??? to his place Come and hear: One An egg that was born on Shabbat and one An egg that was born on Yom Tov yes. ??? No. ??? of it ??? and to make adjacent of it the footprints the mattress but: ??? upon it implements of on account of that did not have ??? Here in this case, also, ??? to his place Come and hear: ??? atop stones on Shabbat ??? the seat Come and hear: ??? atop to the children on Shabbat ??? upon them Come and hear: ??? atop ??? on Shabbat ??? because of the sun ??? because of the rains but only if it is not his intention ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? That there are honey He said to him Rav ??? to Rav Ashi this accounts in the days of the sun

דף מג,ב גמרא

That there are honey in the days of the rains ??? honey What is there to say? No. ??? except ??? two ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? upon them this one No. He accounts for upon them What then does it mean when it says is forbidden If so, this one for it teaches: but only if it is not his intention ??? and So let him teach ??? In what matters are we saying this? ??? about them but not ??? about them is forbidden Thus can we come and learn from this. despite the fact ??? about them but only if it is not his intention ??? with whom does it agree? If it was Rabbi Shimon Watch out for leading vav And he doesn't have muktzeh If it was R' Yehudah For No. ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall this one a thing that do not ??? is forbidden In reality lit: In the world R' Yehudah What then does it mean when it says but only if it is not his intention ??? that did not have ??? them ??? so that thus it will be that is not ??? ipso facto Rav Ashi said: who The tanna teaches: in the days of the sun and in the days of the rains ??? because of the sun ??? because of the rains The tanna teaches: ??? That there are the sun ??? and there are the rains and there are honey He said to them Rav Sheishet ??? and they said to him: to R' Isaac Already ??? Rav Huna ??? in Bavel for thus said Rabbi ??? doing a partition for a dead person on account of ??? And we do not make a partition for a dead person on account of did he die Who is it for thus said Rabbi Shmuel son of Yehudah and thus was taught ??? did he die ??? shall come two people they sit ??? to them downwards this sends a bed who dwells upon it and this sends a bed who dwells upon it ??? to them upwards From those that bring ??? about them this he stands upright his bed ??? And he would walk... continued on next daf and this he stands upright his bed ??? And he would walk... continued on next daf ??? a partition ??? it was said: did he die ??? Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? to the bottom Rav ??? son of ??? in the name of Rav he said ??? upon it a loaf or the infant ??? in a case That there are a loaf or the infant the whole world does not disagree who permits Because specifically, where they disagree is this: the one who does not have ??? from the trapping of ??? No. ??? Let us say, ??? yes. ??? the dead because of ??? R' Yehudah said son of ??? I hear ??? the dead because of ??? How so? If it was That there are a loaf or the infant What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? that came first If it was ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא with R' Yehudah son of ??? except Is this not ??? from the trapping of ??? reasoned ??? from the trapping of ??? No. ??? No. ??? from the trapping of ??? And this is like the position The reason is with R' Yehudah son of ??? on Watch out for leading vav !! and they died?

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.