It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

No. he is obligated Rabbi except in a private domain ??? like who ??? is comparable but: that is not ??? No. And if you would say Here in this case, also, ??? in a private domain ??? who he is liable For didn't Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah say he said Rabbi Abba Thus said Rabbi ??? Rav said ??? valued him, and four cubits ??? is exempt on account of that is not ??? except R' Zayra said: So, with whom does it agree? others She as it is taught: others say he stood in his place ??? he is liable He uprooted from its place ??? is exempt he stood in his place ??? he is liable this one in the case of ??? atop a place four there is not in this case. except Learn from this No. in the case of a place four and perhaps, ??? he that is not in the case of this one ??? in the case of ??? also perhaps, ??? That there are also ??? he said Rabbi Abba Our mishna For example, ??? atop על גבי ??? That there are also ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: It was taught by ??? in a private domain except ??? he Let us say, that is not like Rabbi Yosi ??? Yehudah as it is taught: Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says ??? he bought ??? on its head ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? atop it he is liable For if it was like R' Yosi ??? Yehudah ??? the master of the house ??? outwards and gave ??? of Responded why is it that he is liable ??? even you say Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna is more ??? Here in this case, to the bottom ??? has a problem to R' ??? who The tanna teaches: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: except R' Abahu said For example, ??? to the bottom than three ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? And if you wish, I could say ??? Rabba said: ??? a Tanna taught: ??? all Behold! except Rabba said: ??? of a person ??? to him ??? on four and thus For he came ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? of a person ??? to him ??? on four Thus said Rabbi Avin: Thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- valued him, and ??? in the midst of ??? of his fellow he is liable And what can we come and learn from this? ??? of a person ??? to him ??? on four Hey, isn't it the case that he said R' Yochanan one ??? What would you have said? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case ??? he ??? but: in a case that is not ??? he ??? I would say No. Come and hear from this Thus said Rabbi Avin: Thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said he stood in his place ??? he is liable He uprooted from its place ??? is exempt Another teaching is like this: others say he stood in his place ??? he is liable He uprooted from its place ??? is exempt he is required R' Yochanan In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- valued him, and ??? he from its place and he returned ??? What then? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Rav Adda bar Ahava said two ??? one ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? for him two ??? one like a person one he is equivalent. he is liable or perhaps, ??? people he is equivalent. but exempt him The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Thus said Rabbi Avin: that R' Yochanan said He brought in ??? a courtyward his fellow ??? who the rains ??? he is liable He disagreed with this R' Zeira What do I have to learn from ??? his fellow What do I have to learn from ??? heaven ??? No. does he act? ??? No. you say ??? except ??? Hey, isn't it the case that in the case of ??? from by regarding a place four there is not in this case. he said Rabbi Chiyya ??? For Rav Huna For example, ??? from by regarding the wall atop wall also Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? Like that which was said by Raba in a wall ??? Here in this case, also, in a wall ??? in a case it was said: of Raba to this other teaching For it was taught in a baraita

דף ה,ב גמרא

he was reads in the book on ??? opposite him. he was reads on top of lit. on the head of ??? before it was even the case that they come ??? handbreadths ??? opposite him. ??? handbreadths ??? on ??? and we were at of it why is it that ??? on ??? this one No. ??? Rabba said: in a wall ??? for he said: Raba in the book that He performs ??? water who ??? except Rabba said: For example, ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? water atop על גבי water Is this not ??? he Come and learn from this. And he is consistent Raba with his reasoning for he said: Raba water atop על גבי water we were ??? atop על גבי water Is this not we were ??? he is required Raba ??? in a vessel and implements of ??? atop על גבי water according to ??? do we go? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? or perhaps, according to implements of do we go? Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. oil ??? atop על גבי wine It is a disagreement R' Yochanan son of ??? And the rabbbis For it was taught in a baraita oil ??? atop על גבי wine ??? A tevul yom with oil No. ??? except oil only. R' Yochanan son of ??? says both ??? this to this Thus said Rabbi Avin: Thus said Rabbi ??? that R' Yochanan said he was required ??? and he has entered and he goes out all the day all of it he is not liable until ??? Abayye said: This is only in the case ??? From where can you derive ??? Master, ??? four cubits he stood ??? is exempt ??? he is liable except ??? cubits he stood ??? he is liable ??? is exempt And what can we come and learn from this? that did not have it was ??? From the hour the first ??? this one he said Rabbi Yochanan one ??? for he said: Rav ??? Rav Ami said that R' Yochanan said ??? but he had second thoughts about them ??? is exempt that did not have it was ??? From the hour the first ??? Master, he said to it ??? Master, he said to it ??? The Rabbis taught the taking out ??? a way ??? he is liable ben Azzai exempts This is satisfactory ben Azzai his reasoning is walking ??? he is equivalent. except rabbis ??? also ??? walking Is this not ??? he is equivalent. in a case ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Rav Ami said that R' Yochanan said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.