It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נ,א גמרא

take ??? there are. ??? except If it was said thus it was said: Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? but: ??? those particular it was said: also For he came ??? Thus said Rabbi Ya'akov Thus said Rabbi ??? son of the grave he said Rabbi They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? but: ??? those particular Ravina says ??? supplies ??? Another teaching is like this: shearings of wool of supplies yes. ??? those particular and if ??? the master of the house ??? of them ??? those particular a Tanna taught: Rabbah son of son of ??? in front of Rav ??? of dates ??? but he had second thoughts about them ??? It is necessary for him ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says it is not necessary ??? he It was taught by to it This is only in the case he said to it The halacha is ??? it was said: Rav said: tying And Shmuel said ??? Rav ??? he said who dwells despite the fact that did not have ??? And even though that did not have ??? This is satisfactory Rav he for he said: ??? And for Shmuel also he for he said: ??? except Rav ??? for he said: like who he for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? No. ??? and not ??? yes. ??? at them." and if he has fulfilled his obligation of them one hour while it is still day despite the fact that did not have ??? and not ??? is permitted. to go out of them Rav Ashi said Even We also ??? for upon regarding the mattress No. ??? in his hand but: ??? but: if he was ??? ways of eating livestock or that he was upon it ??? or ??? while it is still day ??? in his hand Learn from this and Which Tanna taught: ??? upon it ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? when Rav Dimi came he said ??? Rabbi Chanina said: One time he has walked Rabbi ??? son of ??? to the place one and found ??? of dates ??? pieces of wood and He said to them: ??? so that ??? about them tomorrow and not ??? If it was the house of ??? it was. If it was the house of ??? it was. ??? If it was the house of ??? it was. If it was the house of ??? it was. ??? the house of ??? or the house of ??? But here, in this case, ??? yes. No. ??? did not say Rav Yehudah he brings in a person fill ??? makes of it all its needs ??? Mar Zutra in the name of Mar Zutra Rabbah This is only in the case ??? to him the principal amount ??? And they said rabbis in front of Rav ??? like who ??? Shimon son of ??? For if it was ??? in the case of It once happened He said to them Rav ??? even you say rabbis Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis ??? It once happened except something a thing ??? of him. It once happened but: something that is not son of ??? of him. It once happened No. Let him say ??? in all ??? the vessels except ??? silver ??? this one ??? and weekday is permitted. For it was taught: ??? and weekday is forbidden Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned in the case of It once happened and one master reasons that No. in the case of It once happened No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world No. in the case of It once happened And there is no difficulty. ??? Rabbi Yehudah this one R' ??? this one is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: a thing that do not ??? is forbidden this one R' Shimon for he said: a thing that do not ??? is permitted. in what way have you established that it is about this teaching who permits like Rabbi Shimon I would say at the end of the teaching, but not ??? at them." ??? and if Rabbi Shimon ??? For it was taught in a baraita

דף נ,ב גמרא

a Nazir ??? but not ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching Hey, isn't it the case that it is R' Yehudah and it is a case of two different Tanaaim According to the opinion of R' Yehudah This a Tanna taught: According to the opinion of R' Yehudah reasoned ??? and that one a Tanna taught: According to the opinion of R' Yehudah reasoned No. ??? in what way have you established that it is like R' Yehudah I would say at the end of the teaching, but: his face his hands and his feet is permitted. this one ??? If you wish, I would say in the case of a child. And if you wish, I would say ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? Sarai Rav Yosef said ??? Sarai Rabba said: ??? Sarai Rav Sheshet said ??? Sarai What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yosef said ??? Rav said ??? son of Joseph all in a case ??? it is of acceptable worth. They asked of him ??? What then? ??? on Shabbat He said to them And so ??? who they permitted his reasoning is It is because of this: ??? they eat Let us say, disagrees of Shmuel for Shmuel said: makes a person all ??? They said: bread No. ??? Behold! ??? Ameimar and Mar Zutra and Rav Ashi are they, ??? Ameimar and Rav Ashi ??? Mar Zutra No. ??? And they said to him Do you not derive from this, Master, about this teaching for he said: Rav Sheishet ??? Sarai He said to them Rav ??? son of of him ??? that even ??? also No. he reasons, derive it This is like as it is taught: ??? a person ??? excrement ??? for upon ??? on account of ??? if on account of ??? is forbidden and they like who ??? This is like as it is taught: wash a person his face his hands and his feet in all day on account of ??? It is because of this: as it is said (Prov. 16) all ??? Hashem ??? Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya says a large basket a bed on ??? take lest wash ??? he said Rabbi Abba he said Rabbi Chiyya son of ??? Everyone acknowledges ??? that he is forbidden to turn We have learnt in a Mishna: But the sages say: take and he turns How so? If it was that is not ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? They said: rabbis except Is this not even though ??? No. In reality lit: In the world that is not ??? and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? lest ??? and one master reasons that They do not concern Rav Huna said This ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? and if Is this not ??? Shmuel said This ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Sarai and if Is this not ??? Mar Zutra (and there are those who say Rav Ashi said: ??? it is of acceptable worth. He said to him: Rav ??? to Raba He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? and radishes under ??? if he was a small portion of upon it ??? he does not ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.