It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נג,א גמרא

Shmuel said This is only in the case ??? to him ??? Rav Nachman said ??? also ??? where he teaches yes. ??? he would exit ??? at a time i.e., in a case that is not ??? to him How so? Shall I say that is not ??? to him A general principle: This is obvious! perhaps, "She has fallen for him and comes to include except Is this not that is not ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? to him ??? Learn from this Another teaching is like this: a donkey he would exit ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? to him ??? and not ??? despite the fact ??? to him ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says Even ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? to him ??? but only that did not have ??? to him ??? but only that did not have ??? to him ??? under ??? Rav brought this very question ??? son of he gave ??? Chiyya son of Rav Ashi What then? to give ??? atop a donkey on Shabbat He said to him: is permitted. He said to him And so Just as between this ??? He was silent. ??? for upon regarding a donkey No. ??? in his hand except ??? This is only in the case ??? now to be picked up is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? He said to him: R' Zeira ??? like his teacher he reasons for himself. for Rav Chiya bar Ashi said: Rav said ??? to a domesticated animal on Shabbat ??? for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? Sarai Here in this case, ??? is it not all the more so? Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said ??? is permitted. ??? is forbidden He went R' Chiyya son of Joseph he said ??? of Rav in front of Shmuel He said to him If so, he said Abba No. know of matters ??? and not anything For ??? R' Zeira he found to R' Benjamin son of ??? and he said for him in the name of R' Yochanan ??? atop a donkey on Shabbat He said to him ??? and thus He explains -- ??? in Bavel ??? Shmuel Hey, isn't it the case that Rav also he said except ??? heard him would conclude of him. And there is no meaning to the word ??? on Shabbat He said to him ??? and thus He explains -- ??? in Bavel everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world Regardless, ??? is permitted. what is the difference here, ??? It is different there in that case where it is possible ??? ipso facto Rav Papa said, here, ??? here, ??? to it ??? to it ??? And this is like the position that they said ??? wine; Even if ??? to it They challenged him from this teaching: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? and not ??? that are between ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? in a purse are his and not ??? in a purse ??? and not a cow ??? and not foals ??? and not livestock ??? and not ??? despite the fact that he was ??? -- this refers to ??? but: he would exit he ??? for upon regarding ??? for upon regarding ??? of it ??? to it ??? with it ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, and not ??? he that is not this one ??? it is of acceptable worth. Is this not ??? but on account of ??? No. ??? but on account of ??? also where he teaches

דף נג,ב גמרא

is equivalent ??? Mar said: and not ??? despite the fact that he was ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We We have learnt in a Mishna: and not ??? that is not ??? this one ??? it is of acceptable worth. So, here, that is not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that despite the fact that he was ??? The tanna teaches: ??? to a person and does not ??? to a domesticated animal and who that it is possible ??? to a person and shall not be ??? to a domesticated animal yes. a person is what he has ??? That would be a support to him. To whose position? livestock ??? to it ??? No. ??? to it If so, What then does it mean when it says this ??? Who deduces ??? he arises ??? he arises Come and hear: ??? to a person And there is no meaning to the word ??? to a domesticated animal Is this not That there are ??? but on account of ??? No. ??? but on account of ??? Come and hear: livestock ??? blood We do not board it in water on account of ??? a person ??? blood ??? that specific in water on account of ??? Ulla said ??? It is because of this: ??? If so, a person also a person ??? livestock also ??? yes. ??? to a domesticated animal and to a domesticated animal who ??? For it was taught: it was is standing except ??? reads to it but it she entered and not ??? perhaps, will come to include and Ravina said For example, that he was ??? of it ??? in the midst of ??? are his ??? son of Isaac he said ??? She ??? livestock ??? No. ??? on account of ??? And Rabbi ??? permits ??? Raba The halacha is like Rabbi ??? Mar said: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? in a purse are his and not ??? in a purse ??? For it was taught: ??? in a purse ??? Rav Yehudah said There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not ??? Rav Yosef said: ??? She For it was taught in a baraita ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? except for ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? but not ??? And if you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that R' Yehudah And there is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? It was taught: R' Yehudah said It once happened ??? the house of ??? that were ??? "and they shall make to them ??? so that that did not have ??? The Rabbis taught It once happened on the first when his wife died. ??? son of ??? and not he was to him the reward for may nurse to give was it made? to him a miracle ??? to him ??? a woman ??? his son Rav Yosef said Come and see how much The greatness a person this that it was made to him a miracle ??? He said to him Abaye ??? how much ??? a person this ??? to him ??? creation Rav Yehudah said Come and see how much ??? of a person ??? upon it ??? creation Rav Nachman said Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? a miracle and not ??? The Rabbis taught It once happened ??? one that he married a wife ??? and not ??? of it until day ??? Rav said Come and see how much ??? a woman -- this refers to that did not have ??? of it ??? He said to him: Rabbi Chiyya -- this refers to ??? objection except how much ??? a person this that did not have ??? What then does it mean when it says pierced at the heart Rav Huna said ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? That this pierced at the heart ??? it is written: (Song of Songs 4) ??? my sister a bride ??? he said ??? to them opposite their heart so that that did not have ??? about them ??? No. ??? It is because of this: ??? in the rear of ??? No. ??? except It is because of this: ??? there is not in this case. ??? And, too, who ??? between Behold! ??? except It is because of this: ??? For ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said ??? to them under ??? so that that did not have they went up to on ??? From where can you derive When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? that are theirs is more so that ??? about them ??? But the beginning of the teaching, so that that did not have they went up to on ??? and at the end of the teaching, so that ??? about them ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? That this ??? it is written: (Prov. 7) and behold a woman ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.