It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נח,א גמרא

there is not there It is because of this: ??? And Shmuel said ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: And who said it? Shmuel thus For didn't Shmuel say he would exit ??? but not ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? for him ??? this one ??? for his own sake in what way have you established that it is about this teaching of Shmuel ??? for him ??? why is it that No. perhaps, ??? for him ??? for him ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Isaac son of Joseph for thus said Rabbi Isaac son of Joseph that R' Yochanan said that is coming out of a garment ??? to him on ??? on Shabbat he is liable A sin-offering and This is like ??? Shmuel for Rav, ??? son of ??? all of them rabbis of the academy of ??? No. ??? for there to be wheat ??? that is not ??? upon you of the academy of ??? Back to the main body of the text: Shmuel said he would exit ??? but not ??? Another teaching is like this: he would exit ??? but not ??? They challenged this from a baraita: He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? and not ??? both this and this yes. ??? and not ??? but: he would exit he ??? both this and this ??? and not ??? livestock No. ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? both this and this yes. ??? Let us say, this one ??? for him ??? this one ??? for his own sake No. This and this ??? for him ??? here, ??? here, ??? And it is like Rav ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah a thing ??? upon it his rabbi; yes. ??? in it a thing that do not ??? upon it ??? in it So, here, ??? When the baraita teaches both this and this yes. ??? If you say, This is satisfactory of ??? Behold! he that is not ??? this one vessels ??? except If you say, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Behold! he that is not ??? this one vessels ??? and this was taught! implements of stones implements of ??? and implements of land" yes. ??? No. in words of Torah and not in words of ??? except Learn from this of ??? Mar said: and not ??? but: he would exit he ??? why is it that No. perhaps, ??? and he came ??? also ??? perhaps, ??? and comes ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? of him. ??? And it is like Rav ??? the son of of Rav Joshua For Rav Huna said: the son of of Rav Joshua Any thing that was ??? No. ??? Mar said: No. ??? livestock No. ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? both this and this yes. ??? yes. ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? of livestock that is tamei

דף נח,ב גמרא

and of ??? that is tahor of ??? and he made for him to a domesticated animal that is tamei of livestock and he made for him ??? even though ??? tamei for all of the vessels ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? And there is no meaning to the word we go up something ??? except ??? It once happened There is no difficulty. this one is what he has ??? this one the one who does not have ??? Just as your soul If it was ??? he despite the fact the one who does not have ??? If it was Is this not ??? he ??? for him ??? yes. It is like that which was said by Rabbi Shmuel son of Nachmeni R' Yonatan said for he said: Watch out for leading vav And R' Shmuel bar Nachmani said R' ??? from where do we learn ??? the voice of in a vessel ??? that he was tamei as it is said (Num. 31) any thing who ??? in fire ??? in fire Even if ??? in fire in what way have you established that it is ??? for him ??? I would say ??? and not ??? but: he would exit he ??? and both this and this ??? If it was the one who does not have ??? who ??? They challenged this from a baraita: One who makes and grape skins ??? books ??? there are to them ??? they do not have ??? upon them that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? for him but: The greatness ??? he for him even though the one who does not have ??? Mar said: ??? about them Of what use are they? Abayye said: Because ??? It is possible ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba ??? And if you say thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: even though that is not ??? like who ??? he is equivalent. For it was taught: ??? of ??? of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? say Just as your soul If it was ??? he even ??? and if No. ??? he even ??? also No. and Rabbah said So says the Torah. in the hour of work ??? between ??? between ??? that did not have in the hour of work he does not ??? No. ??? and not ??? on ??? that did not have in the hour of work It is because of this: ??? that it in the hour of work and on ??? that it in the hour of work It is because of this: ??? that did not have in the hour of work except Rabba said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.