It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עא,א גמרא

??? but: ??? to him on ??? of ??? Sabbath ??? ??? in its place is standing Abaye said ??? also ??? in that place ??? One She and who it has to Raba ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: he ate two olives milk ??? one ??? to him on One from them and he returned he ate an olive's volume ??? of two Rabba said: ??? sacrifice on ??? and a second person ??? three he does not ??? sacrifice on ??? the third and a second person ??? he does not ??? sacrifice on ??? all of them Abaye said even ??? sacrifice on one from them ??? all of them according to ??? If so, ??? also ??? it has ??? he does not have the validity ??? them ??? and Raba -- why must that case be taught as well? to R' Zeira who seeks Rabbi Zeira ??? And there are those who say it was Rabbi brought this very question ??? Zeira ??? Sabbath ??? and he returned ??? Sabbath ??? What then? ??? He said to him: ??? and not combine together and all in a case ??? No. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: he ate milk and milk ??? one he is not liable except One he ate milk ??? and notar ??? one he is liable on all One and one -- this refers to ??? in great quantity ??? one -- this refers to ??? one ??? in great quantity ??? he ate ??? olive tree and he returned he ate ??? olive tree ??? one he is liable ??? sectarians. is exempt and we were at of it ??? one he is liable it's necessary to say this. and Raysh Lakish said It is because of this: son of ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that ate with two ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua She for he said: ??? What would you have said? Rabbi Yehoshua said: between ??? between ??? Come and hear from this ??? did not say ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? He said to him: Master, He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he would say over to it and has a problem We ??? we learn to it And there is no difficulty. to us ??? sectarians. is exempt it requires to say and Raysh Lakish said It is because of this: son of ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? one But why? a seminal emission for him two sectarians. that ate with two ??? and R' Yehoshua She for he said: ??? and It is to learn from this for he said: Rabbi Yehoshua between ??? between ??? one and a second person ???

דף עא,ב גמרא

from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? one ??? one ??? one ??? one it's necessary to say this. Rav Huna said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? to him ??? and Rabban Gamliel She for he said: yes. ??? it was said: he ate two olives milk ??? one ??? to him on ??? and he returned ??? to him on the second R' Yochanan said: he is liable two ??? he said he is not liable except One Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he is liable (Lev. 4) on ??? he said is exempt (Lev. 4) ??? to him ??? it is written on ??? This certain individual after atonement and to Rebbi Yochanan also it is written (Lev. 4) ??? to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, who ate an olive's volume ??? to him on an olive's volume and he returned he ate ??? olive tree after ??? of two What would you have said? ??? Come and learn from this. He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi ??? for him before the parasha (scriptural section) ??? In this case, ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that ??? but: after the parasha (scriptural section) he would acknowledge the correct position of for him ??? to R' Yochanan ??? two or perhaps, ??? for him after the parasha (scriptural section) ??? In this case, ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that ??? but: before the parasha (scriptural section) he would acknowledge the correct position of for him R' Yochanan ??? he is liable except One or perhaps, between ??? or whether ??? It is a disagreement He said to him ??? between ??? or whether ??? It is a disagreement For if it was You might have thought before the parasha (scriptural section) ??? but: after the parasha (scriptural section) give thanks for him ??? to R' Yochanan ??? two ??? for him he read after atonement ??? after the parasha (scriptural section) and if after the parasha (scriptural section) ??? but: before the parasha (scriptural section) give thanks for him Rabbi Yochanan ??? he is liable except One ??? for him he read in the amount like an olive ??? before the parasha (scriptural section) and perhaps, ??? from doubt for him and if ??? to say he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: if ??? to say before the parasha (scriptural section) They disagreed about this, Rabbi Yochanan in what way does ??? for him ??? in the amount like an olive ??? and if ??? to say after the parasha (scriptural section) ??? in what way does ??? for him ??? Ulla said for one for he said: a guilt-offering certainly No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.