It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עט,א גמרא

until ??? and not ??? Rava said: everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world give thanks with a contract ??? and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned ??? And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned yes. ??? Rav Ashi said: because of ??? obligation two for he said: for him Look, a person ??? so that to do ??? Raba brought this very question ??? the taking out ??? He said to him ??? so that to do ??? He said to him: No. ??? He said to him there is no difference ??? and the spinning into thread ??? and the weaving two threads ??? Perhaps, immediately ??? he arises ??? So, here, immediately ??? he arises ??? or in the case that one is not ??? He said to him: there is no difference and not two between ??? the taking out ??? so that ??? of them ??? And even ??? those that are not ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? nuts ??? so that ??? of them ??? a child ??? this one it was said: He ascended Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah on account of that do not a person a burden ??? of them ??? Consider this case: ??? a garden ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? a garden less than ??? Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira says five And even according to ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: manure and weekday ??? so that ??? in it ??? of ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva But the sages say: so that ??? this one it was said: He ascended Rav Pappa said: this one ??? this one that is not ??? on account of that do not a person a burden to discharge the mitzvah Let him say One ??? Consider this case: ??? It was taught: "We thank..." the sages to Rabbi Shimon ??? and we were at ??? Of what use are they? and Thus said Rabbi ??? of them ??? And even according to ??? It was taught: ??? so that to do of them the mouth of ??? there i.e., in another mishna also ??? on account of that do not a person a burden ??? ??? to do in it the mouth of ??? Come and hear: for he said: Rabbi Chiyya son of Ami in the name because of Ulla three skins there are. ??? that is not that is salted that is not ??? that is not ??? and how much time is the duration of ??? Watch out for leading vav For Rav learned: Shmuel son of Rav Yehudah so that ??? in it ??? a small one and how much time is the duration of Abayye said: ??? and not ??? and not ??? and how much time is the duration of ??? so that to do ??? and not ??? and how much time is the duration of ??? so that to write upon it ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, so that ??? in it ??? a small one And Abaye said ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? For it was taught in a mishna: a cloth three on three ??? four on four ??? Hashem on Hashem ??? six on six between ??? between for a dead person ??? He ascended a cloth ??? thus in the same way the measure ??? This certain individual ???

דף עט,ב גמרא

??? so that to write upon it parasha (scriptural section) ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? so that to write upon it ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? a seminal emission them ??? yes. For it was taught: ??? tefillin with the tefillin ??? ??? before ??? yes. ??? ??? Rabbi Shimon son of Yehudah says It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon ??? tahor until ??? Rabbi ??? in his name says tahor until ??? in mezuzot herself Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? so that to write upon it parasha (scriptural section) a small one ??? that it "Hear, O Israel" from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching in mezuzot herself is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? so that to write upon it ??? so that to write upon it parasha (scriptural section) a small one ??? that it "Hear!" ??? Rav said ??? Behold! She ??? Just as ??? upon it tefillin Even ??? upon it tefillin We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? so that to write parasha (scriptural section) a small one ??? that it "Hear, O Israel" ??? yes. ??? Come and hear: The halacha is to Moses ??? tefillin on ??? on ??? in a place meat ??? in a place ??? For it was taught: he sleeps is invalid, ??? For it was taught: he sleeps in this and in this is invalid, This and this ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in a place ??? So, too, ??? in a place meat And if you wish, I would say he sleeps in this and in this ??? She as it is taught: he sleeps in this and in this is invalid, Rabbi ??? considers it proper It is because of this: Rabbi my brother son of ??? And there are those who say it was It is because of this: Rabbi Ya'akov the son of Rabbi Chanina Rav Papa said, Rav for he said: ??? of the academy of ??? of the academy of ??? on ??? and on ??? is invalid on ??? and on ??? and on ??? is valid ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? who ??? except Is this not tefillin ??? tefillin ??? who ??? For this teaching ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: one like it; tefillin ??? and a Torah scroll ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make from them ??? on account of that do not ??? is stricter to "Kedushah", lightweight The reason is ??? this one ??? doing ??? why is it that Is this not ??? No. ??? on ??? who ??? yes. For it was taught: ??? on ??? on ??? and on ??? is invalid Rabbi Shimon said: son of ??? Rabbi Meir he was ??? on ??? because of ??? Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: for Rav, also No. you say ??? Behold! he ??? except I would say ??? Behold! he ??? Just as ??? upon it ??? Even ??? upon it ??? so that to write

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.