It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צא,א גמרא

What would you have said? ??? nullification ??? Come and learn from this. Anyone who does on the understanding of the first he makes Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said he is obligated he was Rabbi Meir Even ??? One ??? This is obvious! Any thing that was We have learnt in a Mishna: What would you have said? Any thing that was To exclude ??? And really until That there are an olive's volume Come and learn from this. He disagreed with this Rav Isaac the son of of Rav Yehudah Except I can object with text from here: ??? to discharge the mitzvah all his house Here, too, that is not ??? until ??? there i.e., in another mishna nullification ??? next to all ??? and every person we are not guilty on its account except ??? Our mishna that is not like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? as it is taught: A general principle: Thus said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? all that is not is valid ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? to this ??? and someone else came ??? this ??? of this Rabba said: Rav Nachman said ??? as regard to eating, but he had second thoughts upon it ??? So, too, ??? but he had second thoughts upon it as regard to eating, he is liable This is obvious! ??? Here in this case, that it is possible ??? Here in this case, that it is possible ??? What would you have said? in the case of ??? And that is absent here Come and learn from this. he is required Raba ??? but he had second thoughts upon it as regard to eating, What then? ??? there i.e., in another mishna he ??? Here in this case, that it is possible ??? Here in this case, that it is possible ??? Here in this case, immediately ??? It was not of him. the measure food No. ??? or perhaps, immediately For this He was silent. and not He accounts for upon it ??? now also ??? immediately For this He was silent. and not He accounts for upon it ??? now also ??? as regard to eating, ??? but he had second thoughts upon it ??? What then? Here in this case, certainly For He was silent. ??? the first No. ??? or perhaps, according to now do we go? ??? according to now do we go? ??? as regard to eating, ??? What then? there are ??? in the matter of Sabbath or yes. ??? in the matter of Sabbath ??? Raba brought this very question ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- an olive's volume terumah ??? tamei What then? for what If it was in the matter of Sabbath ??? in the case of If it was in the matter of ??? an egg's volume they eat in the case of In reality lit: In the world in the matter of Sabbath For example, That there are less than the quantity of an egg they eat and that one ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? in the matter of ??? also in the matter of Sabbath or perhaps, all in the matter of Sabbath ??? in the case of He said to him ??? Abba Shaul says: two ??? and bread ??? But why? Let us say, ???

דף צא,ב גמרא

he would exit in the amount like an olive in the matter of Sabbath also in the amount like an olive thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? except ??? for him ??? No. ??? until ??? for him ??? Here in this case, Sabbath ??? together ??? ??? had a vision he is not liable except ??? This is obvious! Abayye said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? What would you have said? immediately ??? the first he arises Come and learn from this. ???

דף צא,ב משנה

the taking out they eat ??? on ??? between ??? between ??? after is exempt because of that did not have One who acts ??? "At the same time," a large basket that it ??? fruits it was given on ??? despite the fact ??? fruits ??? is exempt until ??? all ???

דף צא,ב גמרא

This ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? is exempt This one comes to ??? except ??? between ??? between ??? after is exempt This one comes to ??? except ??? But hey, come and learn from this. The reason is ??? this one No. ??? that is not ??? as it is taught: the taking out ??? a way ??? he is liable ben Azzai ??? a large basket that it ??? he said ??? They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? he is liable Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? implements of No. ??? And R' Yochanan said: Even if ??? is exempt Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? implements of ??? R' Zayra said: ??? Not like Hezekiyah ??? that is not ??? Yochanan ??? No. ??? where he teaches until ??? all ??? The reason is ??? this one all the fruits? is exempt Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? implements of ??? like Rabbi Yochanan No. ??? where he teaches despite the fact ??? fruits outside The reason is ??? fruits this one all fruits even though ??? a large basket ??? he is liable Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? implements of No. ??? So rather, it is a problem ??? and R' Yochanan ??? with his reasoning ??? with his reasoning until ??? all ??? In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: ??? was it made? ??? all ??? he is liable Rabbi Yehudah ??? with his reasoning despite the fact ??? fruits outside and not most of fruits only. except even all fruits is exempt until ??? all ??? They challenged him from this teaching: the taking out ??? it was given on ??? despite the fact ??? sectarians. outside is exempt until ??? all ??? it is a problem ??? He could say to you ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Bibi son of Abaye ??? a purse on Shabbat he is liable immediately ??? before ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of prohibits Sabbath he was ??? and he goes out is exempt for behold! prohibits ??? prohibits Sabbath have come ??? and if You might have thought ??? implements of ??? for him prohibits ??? Sabbath If it was ??? a way his mouth Here, too, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? a way ??? a place ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.