It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צד,א גמרא

??? on ??? on ??? He disagreed with this Rav Ashi Hey, isn't it the case that Even on ??? The tanna teaches: except Thus said Rabbi ??? For example, ??? in this and in this ??? to him and he returned ??? to him ??? of Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? ??? is exempt Even on ??? Let us say, ??? Rabbi Natan She and not rabbis as it is taught: the taking out livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? between depend or whether ??? he is liable Rabbi Natan says on ??? he is liable and on depend is exempt ??? himself Rabba said: even you say rabbis ??? does not disagree rabbis upon it of Rabbi he gave except ??? raw lit., living and "uf" ??? but: a person ??? himself even rabbis ??? He said to him Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? to Raba Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita en Beteira permits ??? and it was taught: en Beteira permits ??? because it was makes in it work that do not we are guilty on its account A sin-offering And Rabbi Yochanan said en Beteira and Rabbi Natan And they said a thing one And if you say that is not ??? rabbis upon it For R' he gave except ??? raw lit., living and "uf" It is because of this: ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of en Beteira and Rabbi Natan ??? even rabbis ??? For that R' Yochanan said ??? to birds and who that it is possible ??? to birds yes. that it is possible of the academy of ??? that R' Yochanan said give thanks R' he gave ??? He said to him Rav ??? son of gifts ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Behold! ??? And R' Yochanan said en Beteira and R' he gave And they said a thing one there i.e., in another mishna ??? he ??? them ??? the king ??? three parasangs ??? the dead ??? he is liable and thus an olive's volume from the dead ??? Rabbah said ??? that R' Yochanan said and Thus said Rabbi Joseph he said ??? exempts he was Rabbi Shimon

דף צד,ב גמרא

Even ??? the dead ??? Rabba said: give thanks R' Shimon ??? in it and a Torah scroll to read in it ??? This is obvious! For if it was Here, too, work that is not it requires ??? She except work ??? to Rabbi Shimon in what way does It concerns itself What would you have said? until That there are ??? For example, Master, to do to him ??? a Torah scroll ??? and to read in it Come and hear from this This certain individual ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak ??? He said to him Rabbi Yochanan the brother ??? the son of ??? to Rav Nachman bar Yizchak like who like Rabbi Shimon I will say ??? Rabbi Shimon ??? A sin-offering ??? is a law established by the Rabbis from this that it is possible He said to him God ??? of him. and even according to R' Yehudah ??? he is equivalent. ??? The greatness honor ??? No. shall you do ??? It was taught there: ??? transgresses without shall you do it was said: One ??? he is liable One ??? Rav ??? he said he is liable Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said is exempt Rav ??? he said he is liable ??? For if it was ??? one ??? to it ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said is exempt now Regardless, this one ??? Rav Sheshet said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita and thus an olive's volume from the dead and an olive's volume from ??? he is liable this one ??? olive tree is exempt For it was taught: ??? olive tree he is liable Is this not this one that teaches he is liable ??? olive tree an olive's volume Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita is exempt ??? olive tree an olive's volume ??? Rav ??? This and this he is liable Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita is exempt ??? olive tree ??? The greatness

דף צד,ב משנה

??? -- this refers to ??? or ??? and thus ??? and thus ??? and thus his beard and thus ??? and thus ??? and thus ??? Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated and the sages forbid It is because of this: the captivity of

דף צד,ב גמרא

he said ??? It is a disagreement in the hand of but: in a vessel he is liable This is obvious! -- this refers to ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What would you have said? rabbis in a vessel also ??? Hey, isn't it the case that where he teaches -- this refers to ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi Eliezer Come and hear from this and Rabbi Eliezer said It is a disagreement for himself but: to his fellow the words of all are is exempt This is obvious! ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What would you have said? Rabbi Eliezer to his fellow also he is obligated Hey, isn't it the case that where he teaches ??? to make you acknowledge ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? and thus ??? a Tanna taught: ??? fill the mouth of ??? he is liable and how much time is the duration of fill the mouth of ??? Rav Yehudah said two For it was taught: ??? two I would say and thus ??? two Another teaching is like this: ??? fill the mouth of ??? on Shabbat he is liable and how much time is the duration of fill the mouth of ??? two Rabbi Eliezer says: One "We thank..." the sages ??? from the midst of ??? for even if One he is liable This item Even ??? is forbidden It is because of this: as it is said (Deut. 22) No. ??? a woman It was taught: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says ??? in the hand of is permitted. in a vessel he is liable A sin-offering who that it is possible something ??? he is liable A sin-offering in the hand of is permitted. initially thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? in the hand of is permitted. in a vessel is exempt but: is forbidden No. ??? in the hand of is exempt but: is forbidden in a vessel he is liable A sin-offering Rav Yehudah said The halacha is like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: This is only in the case ??? and thus ??? It is because of this: What then does it mean when it says ??? he said Rabbi Avin: R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina ??? It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: spinning into thread And they said rabbis in front of Rabbi Abihu And so a way ??? objection And so a way "writing" objection And so a way ??? objection except R' Abahu said To me ??? for me of him of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.