It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צז,א גמרא

and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching ??? the value of ??? No. ??? except ??? it was. (Num. 14) ??? it was. ??? In the matter You say (Num. 12) ??? Even Hashem with them." ??? This teaches ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva He said to him: Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira ??? whether like this or whether like that you future to give justice. if ??? the Torah ??? And you, ??? that specific And if not, you sent forth ??? on that specific a righteous person So rather, it is written with them." This certain individual ??? in reality It was taught: like who for he said: Even ??? As it is written (Num. 12) ??? to ??? and behold ??? a Tanna taught: ??? Raysh Lakish said ??? As it is written (Ex. 4) there are. No. ??? for me etc. ??? in the presence of the Holy One, who is Blessed, ??? Israel He said to him: there are. ??? My son, ??? And you, yes. ??? there are. ??? As it is written (Ex. 4) ??? the nation My son, ??? (Gen. 15) ??? you yes. ??? as it is said (Num. 20) ??? No. ??? among etc. From where can you derive ??? As it is written (Ex. 4) and he said Hashem to him any more that comes please, your hand. ??? Rabba said: (and there are those who say Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina ??? that is good ??? in going ??? For this with the attribute of ??? it is written (Ex. 4) ??? and behold ??? And even ??? that is good it is written ??? and behold ??? he ??? (Ex. 7) ??? a bed ??? ??? R' Elazar said a miracle in the midst of ??? he is required Rabbah to the bottom for the ten ??? In this case, ??? say ??? how much ??? and one master reasons that we do not say ??? how much ??? but: is more for the ten the words of all are is exempt and not ??? or perhaps, is more for the ten ??? In this case, ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that No. ??? but: to the bottom ??? the words of all are he is liable What is the reason? ??? how much ??? is comparable Rav Yosef said this one the validity ??? for him for Rav, ??? av Hamnunah ??? and transgresses in the public domain herself R' ??? he is obligated and the sages ??? in the public domain herself This is obvious! to the bottom for the ten ??? and in what way Shall I say ??? to the bottom for the ten he ??? is more ??? No. he is obligated For didn't R' Elazar say the taking out ??? is more for the ten he is liable which provides ??? My son, ??? except Is this not ??? to the bottom for the ten he ??? is more for the ten No. he is obligated Learn from this ??? how much ??? Learn from this and disagrees For R' ??? for he said: ??? he is obligated he was R' ??? even is more ??? and This case where he teaches ??? herself to make you acknowledge ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and disagrees of Rav ??? son of excessive ??? for he said: Rav ??? son of excessive ??? ??? three the words of all are he is liable is more for the ten the words of all are is exempt than three and until ??? we came ??? R' ??? And the rabbbis Another teaching is like this: in the midst of three the words of all are he is liable is more ??? he does not except It is because of this: the captivity of and if they were ??? are his is permitted. than three and until ten Rabbi Akiva he is obligated and the sages ??? Mar said: if they were ??? are his is permitted. Let us say, ??? of Rav ??? two houses with two ??? Rabbah the son of Rav Huna Rav said is forbidden to throw from this to this And Shmuel said is permitted. to throw from this to this Is this not who ??? For example, ??? one ??? one ??? stillborn lit., fallen and comes to include He said to him: Rav Chisda for Rav, ??? And there are those who say it was av Hamnunah for Rav, ??? this one the validity ??? rabbis all less than than three are equivalent to "lavud" an implicitly closed gap He said to him: on account of where it is not possible to it ??? If so, three also And, too, this one For it was taught in a baraita ??? walls upwards to the bottom if there are. ??? from the land three handbreadths is invalid this one less than than three is valid there i.e., in another mishna we were The reason is It is because of this: ??? to it a partition ??? of it this accounts to the bottom is more What is there to say? except all less than three are equivalent to "lavud" an implicitly closed gap Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion We have a tradition that to it The Rabbis taught ??? in the midst of Rabbi he is obligated and the sages ??? Rav And for Shmuel who both say No. he is liable Rabbi except in a personal domain ??? like who ??? he is equivalent. but: that is not ??? did not say Rav Channah Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said he is obligated he was Rabbi two One It is because of this: ??? and one It is because of this: ??? Rav Channah ??? has a problem

דף צז,ב גמרא

This comes to imply ??? Rabbi ??? in a place ??? For it was taught: Rabbi says items the things ??? the things these ??? to Moses at Sinai He said to him: Rav Yosef Master, to this other teaching he would say over to it and has a problem of Rabbi ??? We ??? Yehudah we learn And there is no difficulty. to us as it is taught: ??? to the public thoroughfare and he crossed four cubits in the public domain Rabbi Yehudah he is obligated and the sages ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said he is obligated he was Rabbi Yehudah two One It is because of this: ??? and one It is because of this: ??? For if it was ??? one he ??? from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis ??? this one ??? to it ??? From where can you derive perhaps, In reality lit: In the world I would say to you R' Yehudah one he ??? And the rabbbis ??? And how It concerns itself For example, he said: until ??? for him ??? In this case, what they disagree about with R' Yehudah reasoned say ??? how much ??? for him ??? And the rabbbis reason that we do not say ??? how much ??? and not ??? for him ??? but: ??? in a place ??? No. he is obligated Rabbi Yehudah Don't let it enter your mind! as it is taught: Rabbi Yehudah ??? Even ??? They said to him: ??? Behold! he are in the general category and placing it on the loom is careful Behold! he are in the general category weaving Is this not ??? together so learn from this he is obligated he was Rabbi Yehudah ??? in a place ??? From where can you derive perhaps, In reality lit: In the world ??? about this teaching ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? And Rabbi Yehudah ??? in a place ??? No. he is obligated In this case, what they disagree about with R' Yehudah reasoned Behold! the forefathers ??? And the rabbbis reason that Behold! ??? Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: where he teaches Rabbi Yehudah ??? If you say, This is satisfactory the forefathers What then does it mean when it says ??? the forefathers except If you say, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? it was said: also Rabbah and Rav Yosef; who both say No. he is liable Rabbi Yehudah except One He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi and for what ??? from the beginning ??? he was R' Yehudah two If it was ??? to it ??? No. ??? to it If it was ??? to it ??? No. ??? to it He said to him: in the case of one who says in all places ??? This is obvious! ??? to throw eight In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- four Behold! the writing of in that place ??? to throw four In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- eight What then? who say this one ??? for him or perhaps, in a case who seeks this one No. ??? Is this not we were for he said: for him Ravina to Rav Ashi And he said to him: in the case of one who says in all places ??? Behold! the writing of in that place ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna how much that is not it is written in that place No. ??? for him Shimon Here in this case, how much that is not he could sprinkle four No. ??? for him ??? The rabbis taught: ??? for the domain the public ??? or the domain Watch out for leading vav or the individual in the midst of four cubits he is liable

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.