It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קד,א גמרא

three on three ??? less than ??? yes. ??? And this is like the position of Raba Rav Chisdah said Let us say, disagrees of Rav Yehudah the son of Rabbi Chiyya that I ??? a child ??? and to Rebbi Yochanan ??? a child the validity ??? Come and learn from this. ???

דף קד,א משנה

??? salt atop ??? on account of that did not have ??? an adult male ??? on Shabbat ??? on Yom Tov

דף קד,א גמרא

Rav pointed out a contradition to him ??? to Raba We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? salt atop ??? on account of that did not have ??? in the Holy Temple yes. in the countryside No. We challenge that from the following baraita a courtyward ??? the rains sends straw ??? of it that I straw that is not ??? for him Rav Acha the son of Rabba said to Rav Ashi This salt How so? How should we understand this? If it was ??? (I Chron. 28) The entirety in writing immediately Hashem by the ??? and if that is not ??? Abraham ??? the blessing of the Service She and not Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Lev. 1) and he sacrificed ??? The entirety ??? and Mar said: -- this refers to ??? Abraham ??? except I would say ??? pieces of wood ??? the blessing of the Service She ??? Raba a courtyward ??? the rains sends straw ??? of it He said to him: Rav ??? to Raba For it was taught: ??? he does not ??? No. ??? and not ??? except ??? a large basket he returns ??? Raba ??? upon it ??? items ??? in error" there are. ??? thus in the same way And they said It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer ??? he does not ??? No. ??? and not ??? except ??? my heart Rav ??? he came There was this guy ??? he said one This ??? that he came ??? for him ??? He said to him Rabbah No. we prohibit except the voice of of ??? Abaye elevate ??? on Shabbat ??? yes. ??? No. How so? How should we understand this? Is this not ??? he is required ??? Learn from this ??? No. ??? he is required ??? For ??? because of ??? because of ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) according to his way on Shabbat but only that did not have ??? and not ??? and not ??? like the way that are doing ??? What is the reason? Is this not ??? and all ??? Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov ??? lest wash ??? and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said women ??? is forbidden What is the reason? Is this not that he came ??? and all ??? No. Perhaps will come ??? For if it was No. you say thus this one for he said: Rav Yehudah women ??? is forbidden there i.e., in another mishna What then does it mean when it says ??? that it is possible except perhaps, will come ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? an adult male ??? on Shabbat in the Holy Temple yes. in the countryside No. What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: ??? No. ??? lest Watch out for leading vav "And he filled ??? Ameimar ??? he said What is the reason? ??? rabbis lest Watch out for leading vav "And he filled ??? Here in this case, No. a garden that it is possible and not ??? that it is possible immediately that he came he saw that he came

דף קד,ב גמרא

??? of it ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shmuel said a pit ??? upon it items ??? They challenged him from this teaching: No. all ??? they permitted except -- this refers to only. And if you say ??? items upon it What then does it mean when it says -- this refers to only. except Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? water life, as it is said (Jer. 6) ??? son. ??? etc. Back to the main body of the text: No. all ??? they permitted except -- this refers to only. ??? My son, ??? upon it and prophets ??? they permitted to them and not prophets ??? except ???

דף קד,ב משנה

??? in the Holy Temple a priest ??? that did not have ??? ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah Rabbi Yehudah says ??? of wood that did not have ??? ??? that specific from ??? and from ??? and from among ??? these are the words of Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Rabbi Akiva says: in all places ??? on One who intentionally violates it he is spiritually cut off and on ??? A sin-offering From here ??? that specific but the remainder of all ??? upon it ??? Rabbi Shimon says: a place ??? to you the sages ??? were given to you that did not have they permitted to you except It is because of this: the captivity of

דף קד,ב גמרא

Rav said Tuvi son of ??? Shmuel said ??? tamei ??? he is liable ??? himself is exempt What is the reason? Scripture states: (Num. 5) ??? and until female ??? who in which there is to him ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? that do not to him ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? until female ??? creates an exclusion ??? A deaf person these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: the one who does not have ??? No. who that it was made ??? he has fulfilled his obligation implements of pottery that is not he was made the father ??? Let us say, ??? in the Holy Temple a priest ??? that did not have ??? ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah Rabbi Yehudah says ??? of wood ??? that did not have ??? ??? Is this not In this case, ??? for he said: that did not have ??? his reasoning is ??? he is liable ??? that did not have ??? his reasoning is ??? is exempt No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world he is liable and here in this other case, In this case, ??? one master reasons that ??? is preferable and one master reasons that ??? is preferable except ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? that specific etc. Is this not In this case, ??? for he said: ??? No. his reasoning is ??? is exempt and the one who said ??? The Courtyard --- his reasoning is he is liable

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.