It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

??? he is required immediately ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? for him ??? a smidge lit: a whatever ??? side and a smidge lit: a whatever ??? side ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna ??? where they said it requires that it should be ??? so that ??? are not they all require ??? so that ??? and Rav Chisda he said One of these and one of these they all require ??? so that ??? Rav Sheshet said ??? atop ??? upon it ??? from ??? three ??? yes. here, a partition yes. here, ??? yes. here, for it is the case that ??? a partition yes. here, ??? to it a partition ??? of it The Rabbis taught ??? this It is not ??? in a wall this and thus two ??? One ??? this and one ??? this and are not ??? -- this refers to ??? less than three it is not necessary ??? three It is necessary for him ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says less than ??? it is not necessary ??? four It is necessary for him ??? and thus two ??? No. ??? so that ??? and not ??? so that ??? if ??? it is not necessary ??? And if not, It is necessary for him ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says if ??? three it is not necessary ??? And if not, It is necessary for him ??? they were One is more and one to the bottom R' Yosi ??? Yehudah says ??? the upper one it is as if She to the bottom and the lower one it is as if She is more but only that upper one should not be is more ??? cubits ??? to the bottom for the ten Abayye said: R' Yosi ??? Yehudah derive it ??? upon it ??? derive it ??? is what he has ??? upon it ??? For this R' Yehudah reasoned is more than twenty and R' Yosi ??? Yehudah reasoned in the midst of twenty yes. is more ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? despite the fact that is not ??? he would say over for him Rav Yehudah to Chiyya bar Rav in front of Rav ??? despite the fact that is not ??? He said to him ??? For didn't R' say ??? Rav said ??? four despite the fact that is not ??? four ??? it was of ??? And what can we come and learn from this? ??? we were ??? What would you have said? ??? say that did not have ??? we do not say ??? it it is as if She ??? This is obvious! Come and learn from this. ??? Zeira for he said: R' Zeira She in the midst of ??? except ??? She in the midst of twenty ??? is more than twenty She is more for the ten ??? to the bottom for the ten ??? all ??? and There is no difference between this to this three it is not necessary ??? And if not, It is necessary for him ??? Here, too, This is obvious! She in the midst of ??? except ??? for him What would you have said? ??? perhaps, will come ??? it it is as if She ??? this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have at the end of the teaching, ??? for him all in which there is ??? three handbreadths there are in it ??? From where do we derive this? that R' Yochanan said Scripture states: (in I Kings 7) ??? the sea ??? ten ??? until ??? a circle-cake round and round ??? thirty ??? they came round and round And this is present here. ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? it is written of him. As it is written (in I Kings 7) ??? a cup ??? thousands the daughter of ??? a smidge lit: a whatever For ??? He accounts for ??? He accounts for It was taught: Rabbi Chiyya sea the one who did Solomon he was ??? hundred ??? how much you shall forty ??? As it is taught: (Lev. 15) and He washed ???

דף יד,ב גמרא

in water ??? all ??? water for all of ??? an elevation-offering of them and how much time is the duration of there are. cubits on cubits ??? three cubits ??? the sages who ??? forty ??? how much are they, them ??? hundred ??? hundred hundred ??? in four, hundred ??? What case is he dealing with? ??? sea the one who did Solomon ??? he was ??? how much ??? on ??? one fourth ??? hundred hundred ??? twenty and five Behold! hundred and twenty and five are they, them It was taught by pointed out a contradiction. son of ??? sea the one who did Solomon three cubits ??? and two ??? No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? a circle-cake it is written except I would say one No. You might have thought As it is written (in I Kings 7) thousands the daughter of ??? the daughter of how much ??? three ??? As it is written (Ezek. 45) tithe ??? from ??? them ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (II Chron. 4) ??? houses ??? thousands This certain individual ??? Abayye said: Learn from this This ??? three you shall and we have learnt in a Mishna: also ??? ark ??? and a pit ??? despite the fact in which they have ??? there are. ??? forty ??? that are ???

דף יד,ב משנה

??? where they said ??? ten handbreadths ??? Any thing that was R' Yosei says ??? three handbreadths

דף יד,ב גמרא

??? where they said etc. Let us say, We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? for he said: ??? in the case of No. What then does it mean when it says ??? of the world If so, ??? also ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? of the world thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: those particular ??? of them R' Eliezer and the sages ??? ten handbreadths ??? Any thing that was and how much time is the duration of Any thing that was Rabbi Chiyya taught even ??? a Tanna taught: One who acts ??? he (except) does not have ??? This is obvious! except I would say he has ??? This also This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? perhaps, will come ??? Come and learn from this. Rabba said: One who acts ??? from ??? three or ??? from the wall three he did not do anything at all. even ??? for he said: say "lavud" What case is he dealing with? is more but: to the bottom immediately ??? a partition ??? of it No. ??? R' Yosei says ??? three ??? Rav Yosef said Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said That is not the halacha like R' Yosi No. ??? and not ??? He said to him: Rav Huna son of ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? to us ??? No. is what you say? Do you really mean that? to us what is the difference here, ??? rabbis upon it ??? also ??? rabbis upon it He said to him that I ??? It is because of this: and it was standing Rabbi ??? Rav ??? he would say over Thus said Rav Yehudah the son of of Rav Shmuel ??? in the name of Rav That is not the halacha like Rabbi Yosi No. ??? and not ??? He said to him is what you say? Do you really mean that? He said to them did not say Raba God he said ??? to it of him What is the reason? ??? he returns of him. It is because of this: of R' Yosi ??? with it He said to him: Raba son of Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him ??? Look, What then does it mean when it says the nation a thing there is someone who teaches this as referring to this other teaching one who drinks water by itself says "of whom all things came into being through His word" R' Tarfon says created souls ??? on all Just as ??? He said to him Rav ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion What then does it mean when it says He said to him ??? Look, What then does it mean when it says the nation a thing

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.