It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

??? about them to the house of study Rava said: ??? his face about them ??? Rava said: ??? himself ??? on his children and on My son, his house ??? This is like of Rav ??? son of ??? he was going my heart Rav he said for him ??? applied to you What then does it mean when it says ??? them he said to it who ??? (Deut. 7) and He will take restitution for ??? to his face ??? R' Yehoshua ben Levi said: ??? the written Torah It is written it would be impossible ??? like a person ??? on his face and make the request ??? from him No. ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? he that is not ??? but: ??? to the righteous ??? And this is like the position for thus said Rabbi Joshua son of Levi What then does it mean that it is written (Deut. 7) "which I command you today ??? the day ??? and not tomorrow ??? the day ??? tomorrow ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? (and there are those who say R' Shmuel son of Nachmeni What then does it mean that it is written (Ex. 34) ??? Even he had asked for him except ??? to the righteous ??? R' Yehuda says: until the house of ??? They posed this difficulty: a pit ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: or perhaps, a pit and not ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: a person he gives ??? and not ??? perhaps, will come ??? -- more from the house of ??? or perhaps, a person he gives ??? perhaps, will come ??? -- more from the house of ??? Come and hear: how much there are. ??? so that her head ??? of a cow and how much time is the duration of there are. ??? Even if ??? Even if ??? R' Yehuda says: the house of ??? is permitted. ??? from the house of ??? is forbidden And they said to Rabbi Yehudah Don't you acknowledge ??? muktzeh and a courtyward even the house of ??? the house of ??? when it is permitted He said to them: -- this refers to a partition and these ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says a pit the house of ??? is permitted. And they did not say to distance except so that her head ??? of a cow this one ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer a pit and not ??? from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Yehudah a pit ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and not She R' Yehudah a pit without ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: If so, we were For R' Shimon son of ??? There is this difference between them: ??? A general principle: Rabbi Shimon said: son of ??? all ??? For example, ??? muktzeh and a courtyward even the house of ??? the house of ??? is permitted. and all ??? For example, ??? that are in the fields the house of ??? is permitted. ??? from the house of ??? forbidden

דף כב,א משנה

R' Yehuda says: if he was a way is a voluntary act the public ??? to the side But the sages say: it is not necessary for him

דף כב,א גמרא

Rabbi Yochanan and R' Elazar that they said ??? here, ??? of ??? here, and he reasons for himself. For didn't Rabbah say son of son of ??? that R' Yochanan said Jerusalem ??? by night we are guilty on its account It is because of this: is a voluntary act the public except here, and not he reasons, and pointed out a contradiction. with R' Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? and pointed out a contradiction. is a law established by the Rabbis ??? as it is taught: ??? because of this R' Yehudah said: who that were to him two houses ??? is a voluntary act the public makes to him ??? from here ??? from here or ??? from here ??? from here ??? he gives in the midst of They said to him: yes. we make an eruv is a voluntary act the public objection it is a problem with R' Yehudah ??? Yehudah it is a problem is a law established by the Rabbis ??? with R' Yehudah ??? Yehudah There is no difficulty. there i.e., in another mishna That there are two ??? that is elevated i.e., important Here in this case, there is not in this case. two ??? that is elevated i.e., important is a law established by the Rabbis ??? There is no difficulty. Here in this case, that it is possible in that place four ??? there i.e., in another mishna there is not in this case. in that place four ??? R' Yitzchak said son of Joseph that R' Yochanan said the Land of Israel yes. we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? Rav Dimi and he said to it about this teaching ??? He said to him Abaye for Rav, ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא

דף כב,ב גמרא

Shall I say It is because of this: ??? to it ??? side ??? side ??? also ??? to it ??? side ??? side ??? the World: also ??? perhaps, ??? He said to him ??? among the pillars For that R' Yochanan said about this teaching ??? it was said: also For he came ??? that R' Yochanan said And there are those who say it was R' Abahu said that R' Yochanan said ??? Israel Watch out for leading vav !! and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: ??? on account of those that are not ??? ??? brought this very question ten from the midst of four and many ??? in it we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? or we are not guilty on its account who follow the reasoning ??? Rabbinic law, not. ??? to you now for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? They said: rabbis No. they came many ??? to it ??? Here in this case, that is not it's settled. ??? is it not all the more so? For ??? to you According to the opinion of R' Yehudah What then does it mean when it says there i.e., in another mishna he ??? Here in this case, he that is not it's settled. ??? No. they came many ??? or perhaps, there is no difference He said to him they are obligated And even if we go up to him ??? He said to him yes. and even ??? the house of ??? He said to him yes. ??? a courtyward ??? enters to it ??? or the domain Watch out for leading vav or the individual to Shabbat with whom does it agree? Shall I say rabbis now for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? They said: rabbis No. they came many ??? Here in this case, that is not it's settled. ??? not all the more so? except Is this not it is R' Yehudah No. In reality lit: In the world rabbis ??? for him Come and hear: ??? is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual to Shabbat or the domain the public ??? You might have thought except ??? is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual to Shabbat or the domain the public ??? with whom does it agree? Shall I say rabbis now for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? They said: No. they came many ??? to it Here in this case, that is not it's settled. ??? not all the more so? except Is this not it is R' Yehudah No. In reality lit: In the world rabbis ??? for him Come and hear: ??? the house of ??? and is subject to the same laws as them ??? is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual to Shabbat ??? and Who is ??? the house of ??? They said: of the academy of R' ??? all that do not ??? It is possible to be picked up ??? of ??? and he shall run before ??? with whom does it agree? Shall I say rabbis now for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? They said: rabbis No. they came many ??? to it ??? Here in this case, that is not it's settled. ??? is it not all the more so? except It is not Rabbi Yehudah He said to him ??? the house of ??? Joshua loves Israel he was he stood ??? to them the road. ??? all in a case ??? to the public all in a case that is not it's settled. ???

דף כב,ב משנה

one a pit the public ??? the public ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual doing to them ??? but: ??? Watch out for leading vav or the individual doing to him a partition that is high ??? handbreadths these are the words of R' ??? R' Yehudah son of ??? says Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? except ??? the public only. ??? doing ??? that is high ten handbreadths

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.