It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כח,א גמרא

he ate ??? four ??? and if ??? also ??? It is because of this: ??? on the land except Ravina said ??? There is this difference between them: for one for he said: ??? Behold! also ??? for one for he said: ??? the land Behold! ??? from ??? were created one ??? What is his reason and one ??? What is his reason one ??? his reasoning is ??? that was last ??? creates an exclusion and A general principle: was it made? A general principle: ??? on ??? them In all things ??? that came first ??? all that is not he is equivalent. for him ??? and one ??? his reasoning is ??? that came first ??? A general principle: and creates an exclusion And there is no meaning to the word are in the general category except Just as ??? Behold! yes. something other than this No. ??? that was last ??? all ??? for him from three ??? R' Yehudah said: in the name of Rav Shmuel son of ??? in the name of Rav we make an eruv ??? but not ??? and not ??? who we make an eruv For it was taught: ??? children" ??? children" No. ??? and if ??? Even ??? children" No. ??? children" And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world ??? children" for it is the case that they saw ??? children" who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: we make an eruv ??? to Israel from terumah Perhaps, even though that is not Look, for this Look, for this Here in this case, also, even though that is not Look, for this Look, for this And if you wish, I would say and thus he comes to say Rav ??? than enough ??? No. For didn't Rav Yehudah say Thus said Rabbi ??? we make an eruv of them and they bless about them "who creates the fruit of the earth" There is no difficulty. this one ??? who has arrived Rav ??? this one ??? who has arrived Rav ??? of the world For it was taught: ??? nullification ??? next to every person For this reason ??? he is liable ??? is exempt ??? and seed ??? seed ??? and thus he comes to say Rav

דף כח,ב גמרא

??? seed ??? for what Look, that R' Yochanan said which provides ??? that did not have he was to them ??? that specific ??? in it ??? R' Zeira When it was that ??? it was. Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? of Rav Yehudah son of Ami he said For ??? rabbis ??? from in front of them ??? in them? The reward ??? he came ??? of the academy of Rav He said to him What then does it mean when it says ??? He said to him ??? "who creates the fruit of the earth" ??? "of whom all things came into being through His word" He said to him: ??? This ??? and that one ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of the academy of Rav What is the reason מאי טעמא This ??? and that one Is this not ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? This ??? Rabbi and that one ??? Rabbi No. She ??? also ??? Rabbi for it is the case that ??? to it ??? yes. we make an eruv For it was taught: ??? By means of money tithe And there is no meaning to the word become tamei ??? they eat ??? By means of money tithe ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? Behold! he ??? for all his words except ??? By means of money tithe ??? Behold! there are. ??? for all their words except ??? from the tithe there i.e., in another mishna ??? If so, In this case, Let us say, Rabbi Yehudah ??? from the tithe For it was taught: Rabbi Yehuda said No. ??? except in the matter of tithe only. ??? they are obligated ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, Is this not ??? and in the matter of ??? they eat that I Like that which was said by Rabbi Yochanan Because ??? by way of lit., through the hands of the fire lit., the light Here in this case, also, Because It is possible ??? by way of lit., through the hands of the fire lit., the light in a case was it said; of Rabbi Yochanan to this other teaching as it is taught: ??? children they are obligated ??? are exempt ??? they are obligated children are exempt Rabbi Shimon the son of Rabbi Yosi says in the name of his father both this and this ??? And there are those who say it was both this and this ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Rabbi ??? in Tzippori in accordance with the words of One who says both this and this ??? and for one for he said: both this and this ??? for what Look, that R' Yochanan said Because ??? by way of lit., through the hands of the fire lit., the light Mar said: Rabbi Yehudah says ??? Behold! he ??? for all his words except ??? By means of money tithe we were a Tanna taught: that came first Abayye said: ??? There is this difference between them: He disagreed with this Raba who that it is possible for one for he said: ??? No. For it was taught: ??? yes. impart tumah ??? they eat ??? upon it impart tumah ??? they eat except Rabba said: There is this difference between them: blessing ??? Rav Yehudah he said "who creates the fruit of the earth" And Shmuel said "of whom all things came into being through His word" Rav Yehudah he said "who creates the fruit of the earth" eating he And Shmuel said "of whom all things came into being through His word" immediately ??? we do not bless ??? "who creates the fruit of the earth" He said to him Shmuel of Rav Yehudah ??? like what you said ??? for it is the case that ??? and we bless upon it "who creates the fruit of the earth" and not She ??? with the intent ??? No. ??? with the intent ??? and even though ??? Shmuel of Rav Yehudah Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? we make an eruv of them and they bless upon them "who creates the fruit of the earth" ??? Like that which was said by Rav ??? Here in this case, also, ??? Rabbah said son of ??? son of Isaac Rav said ??? Rav said ??? son of ??? we make an eruv ??? except ??? and how much time is the duration of Rav said ??? Rabbi ??? They asked of him What then? ??? moist ones It was not in his hands For he came to the house of study And they said to him Thus said Rabbi ??? we make an eruv ??? moist ones and how much time is the duration of Rav said ??? Rav Hamnunah said we make an eruv ??? depend Really? For didn't Rav Chisda say ??? Chiyya ??? a person Chiyya

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.