It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

No. ??? for him ??? for it is the case that ??? for him And even if thus twenty cubits he ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? of ??? they were atop it -- this refers to is more ??? -- this refers to is more ??? and that one What then does it mean when it says ??? perhaps, For this teaching ??? It was taught: and that one What then does it mean when it says ??? perhaps, in the shape of ??? Why is it that he said Rabbi ??? Rav said ??? four despite the fact that is not ??? and if there are to it ??? Even if its height -- more than twenty cubits it is not necessary for him ??? Rav Yosef said ??? She one The tanna teaches: to it Abayye said: Hey, isn't it the case that Chama the son of of Rabbah son of Avuah The tanna teaches: to it ??? for Rav, Rav would say to you ??? I from here ??? who No. ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say ??? She To me also ??? She Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said without Rav ??? No. ??? According to the sages, ??? The reason is What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: ??? and This case where he teaches ??? of ??? the signs that we given? in reality and Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak This is satistfactory If it was No. he reasons for himself. this one of Rabbah except If it was he reasons for himself. this one of Rabbah for he said: Rabbah it is written (Lev. 23) so that ??? For ??? until twenty cubits a person know ??? in a sukkah is more than twenty cubits yes. a person know It is because of this: that is not ??? of him. ??? Perhaps, regarding a sukkah also ??? why do I have Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard regarding a sukkah In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yehudah immediately ??? of him. ??? but: ??? does he act? I would say give thanks the sages, and if we had heard In this case, In this case, ??? rabbis but: ??? I would say ??? for him according to R' Yehudah Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Chama the son of of Rabbah son of Avuah he said ??? When Rav Dimi came he said In the west, they said ??? The one who said ??? how much more so ??? but: ??? No. ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא It is because of this: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that a sukkah ??? rabbis that is not except immediately that he came He accounts for it has ??? a small portion of ??? in the midst of twenty and a small portion of ??? is more than twenty a small portion of ??? in the midst of twenty and a small portion of ??? is more than twenty Rabbah said ??? is valid in a sukkah is invalid, what is the difference here, ??? a sukkah also Let us say, ??? If it was ??? to it ??? is greater than ??? Here in this case, also, If it was ??? to it ??? except on ??? of ??? Here in this case, also, on ??? she was made ??? is greater than its sun Rabba said: ??? a sukkah ??? She No. ??? that began to recite ??? ??? Ravina he said a sukkah a law established by the Torah ??? of it rabbis ??? Rabbinic law, not. ??? of him. rabbis Rav ??? son of gifts he would say over about this teaching ??? of Rabbah ??? Rabbah said ??? is invalid, in a sukkah ??? what is the difference here, a sukkah ??? also Let us say, ??? If it was ??? you shall to it ??? Here in this case, also, If it was ??? to it ??? is greater than ??? except on ??? she was made ??? is greater than its sun Here in this case, also, ??? of ??? Rabba said: ??? a sukkah ??? She pointed out a contradiction. ??? She ??? and not that began to recite ??? that they said ??? of the academy of ??? No. ??? and not ??? Ravina he said a sukkah a law established by the Torah it does not require ??? is a law established by the Rabbis he is required ??? What then do we do about it? Rabbah son of Rav ??? he said both this and this is invalid, Rava said: both this and this is valid

דף ג,ב גמרא

??? a sukkah We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: He said to him Rav ??? to Raba It was taught: ??? to you ??? that he was that is high than twenty cubits -- more ??? of ??? twenty ??? Rav ??? son of Rav Ashi for Rav, ??? How so? would make ??? twenty to the bottom I would say and onwards Hey, isn't it the case that to the bottom The tanna teaches: Thus can we come and learn from this. ??? Just as is more ??? twenty Even to the bottom ??? Abayye said: in the name of Rav ??? "true" a sukkah and truth ??? the daughter of five "true" ??? the daughter of Six "true" ??? the daughter of five for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? And this is present here. ??? in four, cubits ??? like who for he said: ??? handbreadths And if you wish, I would say in four, cubits and most of cubits he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: "true" a sukkah ??? the daughter of five for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? and to the wall-partition ??? And this is present here. ??? a sukkah in four, cubits ??? as it is taught: Rabbi says says I all a sukkah where there is not in it four cubits on four cubits is invalid ??? that they said Even if It is not ??? except his head and the majority of his body and his table And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world Rabbi She and most of cubits he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: "true" ??? the daughter of Six for what ??? the vineyard ??? the vineyard For it was taught in a baraita ??? the vineyard the academy of Shammai say twenty and four cubits And the academy of Hillel say ??? ten cubits ??? the vineyard The academy of Shammai say: ??? ten cubits but the academy of Hillel say: two ten cubits What is an example of one ??? the vineyard vineyard that ??? was destroyed there is not there ??? ten cubits No. ??? seed for the sake of lit. in the name of they were in that place ??? ten cubits he gives to him so that ??? ??? and Who is ??? the vineyard between vineyard ??? there is not there two ten cubits No. ??? seed for the sake of lit. in the name of they were in that place two ten cubits he gives to him so that ??? ??? And this is present here. ??? in four, cubits ??? For it was taught in a baraita vineyard ??? on less than ??? cubits Rabbi Shimon says: he does not vineyard But the sages say: vineyard ??? ??? it is as if ??? that they said you shall vineyard ??? I would say In reality lit: In the world R' Shimon and most of cubits he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and Raba in the name ??? he said all cubits ??? the daughter of Six except ??? They challenged him from this teaching: all cubits where they said the sages ??? the daughter of Six but only

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.