It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ל,א גמרא

but: ??? No. And if you say Here in this case, ??? and here in this other case, ??? For it was taught: Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says we make an eruv ??? so that his meal ??? in the case of a meal ??? of every person it is a problem And who said it? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? thus For it was taught: Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says Og the king of Bashan ??? and Abaye there i.e., in another mishna in what way does ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? rabbis upon it of Rabbi Shimon son of ??? or No. Come and hear: for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: Og the king of Bashan ??? there i.e., in another mishna That there are openings children ??? and there are one that there is four ??? For ??? Rav said Chiyya son of Rav Ashi said: Rav we make an eruv in the case of the flesh. ??? Rav said ??? son of Chiyya we make an eruv ??? and how much time is the duration of Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? he said ??? from the meal is permitted. in water ??? salt and water he that is not ??? food this one In all things ??? food Let us say, ??? of Rav And for Shmuel of Rav And for Shmuel who both say They do not bless created varieties of food except on ??? the sectarians. only. and not ??? one ??? Let us say, ??? also ??? Rav Huna said in the case of one who says all ??? by the water and salt he that is not ??? this one In all things ??? For didn't Rabbah say son of son of ??? When it was that I am going secondly, of Rabbi Yochanan ??? For we were at among hundred it was. ??? for all one and one ten ten For we were at among ten it was. ??? for all one and one hundred hundred and all hundred ??? you shall ??? them ??? the daughter of three ??? and it was ??? them ??? and he said ??? that is not he tastes. for me ??? I would say ??? Rav Huna said Rav said ??? that did not have he eats a loaf -- this refers to we make an eruv to him of it a loaf -- this refers to by the yes. we make an eruv to him of it They challenged him from this teaching: ??? from the plain we make an eruv to him of it Is this not for he said: by the No. for he said: -- this refers to Here, too, ??? it is taught at the end when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case who said ??? that did not have ??? but: he said by the What about in this case, too, ??? we make an eruv to him of it ??? a loaf -- this refers to that which was sanctified for Temple use yes. we make an eruv to him of it on account of that do not we make an eruv ??? ??? ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? for he said: -- this refers to but: he said by the yes. we make an eruv to him of it Rav would say to you ??? Rather, what can we conclude? all in a case for he said: by the we make an eruv it is a problem But the beginning of the teaching, ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? from the plain we make an eruv to him of it and even he said by the was it made? ??? that did not have ??? from all a place It is a difficulty for Rav's position. ??? he for he said: like Rabbi Eliezer as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? that did not have he eats a loaf -- this refers to we make an eruv to him of it a loaf -- this refers to by the yes. we make an eruv to him of it And who said it? Rabbi Eliezer thus For it was taught: This is the general rule: a person ??? himself ??? we make an eruv to him of it he eats ??? to a person yes. we make an eruv to him of it Rabbi Eliezer says: a loaf -- this refers to by the we make an eruv to him of it a loaf -- this refers to that which was sanctified for Temple use yes. we make an eruv to him of it on account of that do not we make an eruv to him ??? it is a case of two different Tanaaim and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi ??? we make an eruv ??? that is not like the academy of Shammai as it is taught: the academy of Shammai say yes. we make an eruv ??? to Israel from terumah The academy of Hillel say we make an eruv ??? to Israel from terumah And they said to them The academy of Hillel to the academy of Shammai If it was "You "We thank..."

דף ל,ב גמרא

??? by day ??? And they said to them instead, they said to them in the same way ??? by day ??? thus we make an eruv ??? to Israel from terumah and the academy of Shammai there i.e., in another mishna that it is possible a meal ??? while it is still day Here in this case, there is not in this case. a meal ??? while it is still day like who that is not ??? as it is taught: ??? says all ??? of the academy of Shammai No. they were "We thank..." ??? until ??? his bed and all implements of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of like who ??? this one that teaches ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? like who Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? She and who follow the reasoning ??? for the academy of Shammai ??? he that is not he has fulfilled his obligation this one ??? he has fulfilled his obligation Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't until say ??? his bed and implements of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? Even ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. like who Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? She and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? says ??? And even ??? No. ??? What is the reason? ??? If so, terumah also ??? If it was ??? He ascended ??? He ascended from someplace else No. ??? that did not have from ??? He ascended of him of him. ??? of it ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? except ??? derive it ??? that they said any thing that he was It is because of this: the captivity of ??? upon it between ??? like who ??? this one For it was taught in a baraita there are where they said The entirety on account of Just as that he was a person fill ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) and fill ??? incense and the drinking of fill ??? by day ??? two meals ??? like who R' Zayra said: ??? She for he said: What then does it mean when it says ??? for him in the case of Let us say, disagrees ??? Shimon son of ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says we make an eruv ??? so that his meal ??? in the case of a meal ??? of every person ??? and an elderly person but: ??? nullification ??? next to all ??? in the house of ??? for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? a person the house of ??? and brought Rabbi Yehudah son of Ami in the name of Rav Yehudah he said the house of ??? Rabbi Yehudah says Even the house of ??? a Tanna taught: because of that it is possible outwards and to walk ??? ark ??? reasoned ??? as it is taught: One who enters ??? the nations ??? ark ??? Rabbi become tamei Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah ??? about what do they disagree? ??? Is this not ??? and this one that teaches Rabbi Yehudah says

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.