It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לא,א גמרא

we make an eruv ??? tahor from terumah that is tahor in the grave in what way does Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? ark ??? Hey, isn't it the case that immediately ??? to it ??? or ??? fruits And how ??? to it ??? implements of wood that is not ??? And then it happened that ??? to it ??? If so, What is the reason מאי טעמא is a law established by the Rabbis They reason is forbidden ??? the house of ??? benefit from this general principle it would follow with R' Yehudah reasoned is permitted. his reasoning is the commandments Is this not ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: Raba the commandments Is this not ??? Let us say, ??? he said ??? He could say to you Raba If it was they both reason this way ??? we make an eruv except for a matter of a commandment everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world the commandments Is this not ??? and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about ??? yes. we make an eruv except for a matter of a commandment ??? we make an eruv even for a matter of freedom but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: Rav Yosef yes. we make an eruv except for a matter of a commandment Let us say, ??? he said ??? Rav would say to you Joseph everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. we make an eruv except for a matter of a commandment And everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world the commandments Is this not ??? In this case, what they disagree about ??? immediately ??? for him ??? No. it's settled. for him ??? it's settled. for him ??? For if it was It is necessary to teach this he has already eaten

דף לא,א משנה

we make an eruv ??? from which had been removed its terumah ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use who have been redeemed the priests. of separating challah but not ??? and not ??? that did not have raised up i.e., separated its terumah and not ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use that did not have redeemed

דף לא,א גמרא

produce that may or may not have been properly tithed this one No. Look, for him ??? So if he wished, ??? them ??? you shall Responded and they saw for him now also Look, for him For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed

דף לא,ב גמרא

and ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Rav Huna said a Tanna taught: The academy of Shammai say: yes. ??? ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed but the academy of Hillel say: ??? ??? from which had been removed ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? and took it away lit: and picked it up from him terumah of tithe and not raised up i.e., separated from him terumah that is large and it is like that which was said by Rabbi ??? Raysh Lakish said for he said: R' Abahu Raysh Lakish said first tithe ??? is exempt ??? that is large as it is said (in Numbers 18) ??? from him terumah of Hashem tithe from the tithe tithe from the tithe Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not terumah that is large and terumah of tithe from the tithe He said to him Rav ??? If so, even ??? also He said to him upon you Scripture states: (in Numbers 18) from all ??? all terumah of Hashem for just as you see This ??? and that one No. ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? ??? and it was not given ??? So come and learn from this. ??? but not ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? According to Rabbinic law, For example, ??? that is not ??? and not ??? that did not have raised up i.e., separated ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? and took it away lit: and picked it up from him terumah of tithe and not raised up i.e., separated from him terumah that is large What would you have said? Like that which was said by for him Rav ??? Come and learn from this. ??? and not ??? two and that which was sanctified for Temple use that did not have ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? and not ??? tithe ??? for the sake of ??? and the Merciful One he said (Deut. 14) ??? silver in which there is upon it an image that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? for the sake of ??? he said and gave ??? and he stood to him

דף לא,ב משנה

??? in the hand of A deaf person a mute and a child or in the hand of who that is not give thanks ??? he does not ??? and if he said after ??? from him Behold! this ???

דף לא,ב גמרא

and a child No. For didn't Rav Huna say a child ??? ??? There is no difficulty. here, In the eruvs that combine ??? here, In the eruvs that combine ??? or in the hand of who that is not give thanks ??? one Rav Chisdah said ??? and if he said after ??? from him Behold! this ??? perhaps, No. ??? for him Like that which was said by Rav Chisda ??? and watching him So, here, ??? and watching him ??? perhaps, No. ??? of him Like that which was said by Rav ??? makes ??? Here in this case, also, ??? makes ??? in a case it was said: of Rav Chisda Rav ??? to this other teaching was it said; as it is taught: were given ??? yes. this ??? and if he said after ??? from him Behold! this ??? and perhaps, No. ??? for him Rav Chisdah said ??? and watching him and perhaps, No. he accepts for him of him Rav said ??? makes ??? Rav Nachman said ??? Torah yes. ??? makes ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.