It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

Rabbi ??? says in their location ??? that did not have in their location No. ??? What then does it mean when it says in their location Shall I say in their location with intent Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: clearly and explicitly Rabbi ??? and Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov say In reality lit: In the world are forbidden until ??? in error yes. with intent No. except Is this not in their location in error and it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: fruits that were taken out from the Courtyard except ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? that did not have in their location but: in their location even with intent ??? and he came R' ??? to say Even if in their location also in error yes. with intent No. No. with intent in their location everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? and here in this other case, in error that did not have in their location ??? a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned in error Sarai that did not have in their location And Rabbi ??? reasoned even ??? in their location yes. that did not have in their location No. Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, Rabbi ??? and Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov say In reality lit: In the world are forbidden until ??? yes. with intent No. from this general principle it would follow of the first tanna? reasoned with intent also Sarai "Hear!" ??? Rav Nachman said Shmuel said One who was walking and he does not know ??? Sabbath walking thousands ??? and this is ??? Sabbath And Rav Nachman says Shmuel said Sabbath ??? gentiles a partition on Shabbat walking thousands cubits ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? and Rav Huna he said walking thousands cubits ??? four cubits ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? lest ??? after ??? Regardless, ??? For ??? It is because of this: that there is ??? to the place ??? to it Chiyya son of Rav said: walking thousands cubits ??? cubits like who that is not ??? and Not like Rav Huna I would say ??? in four, If so, we were For Rav Huna I would say and thus he said Rabbi Chiyya son of Rav He said to him Rav ??? to Rav Huna. No. ??? upon it of Shmuel as it is taught: ??? as it is taught:

דף מב,ב גמרא

he was measures came ??? the city is permitted. ??? in all the city All of it but only that did not have passes over ??? in what way ??? Is this not by way of lit., through the hands of ??? Rav Huna said Not on the hands of ??? Rav Huna said he was measures came ??? a courtyward he (except) does not have ??? a courtyward This is obvious! I would say he has ??? a courtyward This also This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? Perhaps will come ??? Come and learn from this. Rav Nachman said give thanks for me ??? he was measures came ??? on ??? is permitted. ??? in all the house What is the reason? Because ??? the house ??? Rav Huna said the son of of Rav he gave ??? to city ??? or ??? Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya say walking All of it and Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabbi Akiva say he (except) does not have four cubits Is this not Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya ??? walking All of it that is not ??? because ??? because ??? No. ??? because ??? No. ??? and R' Yehoshua and R' ??? he (except) does not have four cubits ??? because ??? because ??? because ??? also ??? From where can you derive perhaps, For No. ??? Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya ??? because ??? What case is he dealing with? there i.e., in another mishna ??? there are. but: ??? because ??? one he So, here, ??? lest ??? after ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua and R' ??? also From where can you derive ??? he perhaps, It is because of this: that he came reason that For say all the house all of it ??? cubits he is equivalent. What case is he dealing with? in a case ??? but: in a case that is not Sabbath ??? while it is still day did not say Rav Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion like Rabban Gamliel ??? And Shmuel said Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion like Rabban Gamliel ??? but: ??? No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world Regardless, The halacha is like Rabban Gamliel ??? What is the reason? Rabbah said Because Sabbath ??? while it is still day R' Zeira he said Because ??? from the beginning of four ??? in the rear of four What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? So, too, ??? And Rabbi Zeira What is the reason? did not say ??? He could say to you ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.