It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נ,א גמרא

Rabbah said What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav It is because of this: that is not would conclude ??? and there are that they said Rabbah said What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav It is because of this: that thus reasoned all that is not "In the case of this one after that one," even "At the same time," he does not What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: for he said: ??? for me in four, cubits ??? The one who said It is because of this: that is not would conclude ??? this one No. would conclude ??? and the one who said It is because of this: all that is not "In the case of this one after that one," even "At the same time," he does not This ??? cubits he is equivalent. ??? four cubits he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Back to the main body of the text: Rabbah said any thing that is not "In the case of this one after that one," even "At the same time," he does not ??? Abaye ??? who gives much ??? why is it that Let us say, all that is not "In the case of this one after that one," even "At the same time," he does not that I tithe ??? For if it was he said ??? a fraction a fraction ??? Consider this case: tithe livestock ??? and he said ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah two ??? and one ten ??? this to that that I tithe livestock ??? "In the case of this one after that one," ??? For it was taught in a baraita he read ??? and to one ten ??? Consider this case: a thangkgiving-offering ??? "In the case of this one after that one," and it was said: a thangkgiving-offering one whose slaughter involved the intention to consume its meat on ??? Hezekiyah said: His holiness He ascended ??? from the midst of ??? R' Yochanan said: No. His holiness He ascended ??? from the midst of ??? this one it was said: He ascended he said R' ??? son of ??? Everyone acknowledges in a case for he said: ??? forty from the midst of ??? No. ??? forty But rather, if so, His holiness ??? the whole world does not disagree that is not His holiness Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? one master reasons that each of them as backups for the other ??? and on ???

דף נ,ב גמרא

??? The greatness ??? Abayye said: They did not teach such a ruling except by a tree ??? Twelve cubits but: by a tree that do not beneath it Twelve cubits Behold! a small portion of his house ??? He disagreed with this Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua From where can you derive ??? would conclude Perhaps ??? That this side ??? That this side ??? except Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua They did not teach such a ruling except by a tree ??? cubits but: by a tree ??? cubits Behold! a small portion of his house ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav who on the way came and it has grown dark to him and it was the case that ??? tree or hedge and he said ??? beneath it did not say anything but: if he said ??? in a place so-and-so walking until ??? to that very a place they come to that very a place walking all of it ??? to him thousands cubits In what matters are we saying this? in a place ??? For example, ??? that he was that is high ??? handbreadths This is only in the case ??? and until the house of ??? and thus ??? that it ??? but it ??? and until the house of ??? but: in a place that do not ??? he (except) does not have Another explanation: they were two one ??? and one that is not ??? this that is not ??? yielding ??? says ??? in a place so-and-so In what matters are we saying this? ??? Another explanation: ??? but not he closes Another explanation: ??? No. ??? from its place Let us say, ??? of Shmuel He could say to you Shmuel Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, That there are ??? his feet and until ??? two ??? and four ??? For if it was ??? for him ??? side ??? he stood for him for there to be wheat ??? If it was he closes Another explanation: ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes and if No. he did not find Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel he erred ??? to have two storms ??? he ??? to him to have two storms or who said ??? for me one ??? upon it ??? and one ??? upon it to south. walking ??? to south. to south. ??? and if ??? upon it ??? No. ??? from its place Let us say, ??? of Rav Rav a Tanna taught: he ??? he said ??? walking ??? his feet and until ??? thousands cubits ??? to his house thousands cubits Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found walking ??? four thousands cubits

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.