It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סט,א גמרא

For it was taught in a mishna: who ??? between in error between with intent ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rav Yosef said I would say he does not ??? Abaye said There is no difficulty. here, ??? My son, ??? here, that did not have ??? My son, ??? For it was taught: before it was even the case that he gave ??? between in error between with intent It is possible to nullify these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yehudah says in error It is possible to nullify with intent It is impossible to nullify who ??? between in error between with intent ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yehudah says with intent ??? in error he does not ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? My son, ??? but: ??? My son, ??? between in error or whether with intent he does not ??? Mar said: R' Yehuda says: ??? "and they shall make your needs ??? before it was even the case that ??? Perhaps, a stranger i.e., a non-Jew he Hey, isn't it the case that We before it was even the case that Let him bring forth We have learnt in a Mishna: I would say before it was even the case that Let him bring forth the day And if you wish, I would say There is no difficulty. here, ??? in a case of concealed plague, here, ??? in a case of publicly known plague. like who ??? this one that teaches ??? Behold! this he does not nullify is a voluntary act ??? you shall except ??? It is impossible to nullify is a voluntary act like who like R' Yehudah This certain individual ??? immediately ??? according to R' Yehudah ??? he said For example, this nullify is a voluntary act according to R' Yehudah Rav Huna said Who is Israel ??? this ??? in a case of publicly known plague. He said to him Rav ??? like who If it was like Rabbi Meir for he said: ??? for a matter of ??? for all the Torah All of it Even if ??? from all ??? also If it was ??? for a matter of ??? shall not be ??? for all the Torah All of it

דף סט,ב גמרא

until that there is ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said to give is a voluntary act and to nullify is a voluntary act and As it is taught: Israel ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? nullify is a voluntary act that is not the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? he does not nullify is a voluntary act because of where they said Israel take is a voluntary act he gives is a voluntary act ??? until ??? How so? says to him ??? to you ??? to you he bought and it is not necessary ??? Rav Ashi said: This a Tanna taught: he ??? upon it Sabbath ??? As it is taught: (Lev. 1) from among you and not ??? creates an exclusion ??? from among you among you ??? and not ??? from ??? people ??? to a domesticated animal from here ??? said Israel so that ??? except for ??? wine ??? in a case of publicly known plague. this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? from among you and not ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by ??? Israel This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction But the beginning of the teaching, ??? for all the Torah All of it ??? for a matter of one I would say at the end of the teaching, except for ??? wine This ??? How so? If it was ??? for all the Torah we were But the beginning of the teaching, If it was for a matter of one it is a problem ??? except Is this not thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: except for ??? in a case of publicly known plague. Perhaps, idolatry Sabbath For ??? Learn from this

דף סט,ב משנה

the men of a courtyward ??? one from them and not ??? his house is forbidden ??? to him to them ??? are permitted to him to them were given to him ??? he is permitted. there are. are forbidden they were two forbid this on this ??? he gives is a voluntary act take is a voluntary act two ??? is a voluntary act And there is no meaning to the word ??? is a voluntary act From when ??? is a voluntary act the academy of Shammai say while it is still day And the academy of Hillel say ??? who ??? between in error between with intent behold! This is הרי זה ??? These are the words of R' Meir R' Yehuda says: with intent ??? in error he does not ???

דף סט,ב גמרא

his house he ??? this one ??? How so? If it was ??? his house why is it that is forbidden If it was that is not ??? why is it that ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? is a voluntary act ??? and not he nullifies is a voluntary act his house ??? reason that rabbis The one who nullifies is a voluntary act ??? is a voluntary act his house No. he nullifies ??? in the house of without a courtyward and that are theirs is permitted. to him and to them What is the reason? that there is ??? were given to him ??? he is permitted. there are. ??? we do not have ??? For ??? one to join with the body of five you shall ??? five to join with the body of one shall not be ??? Learn from this ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: were given to him ??? from the beginning he is permitted. there are. ??? they were two forbid this on ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? one ??? for him ??? What would you have said? ??? Come and learn from this. ??? It was not for him ??? he gives ??? this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have If it was he gives ??? If it was take ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? for him two ??? is a voluntary act Here, too, This is obvious! What would you have said?

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.