Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף ז,א גמרא
and Rabbi Yehoshua She that is not ??? the voice of And if you wish, I would say thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: all in a case ??? it is a case of two different Tanaaim and two ??? similar to It is a disagreement the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel No. ??? For ??? And so ??? and not ??? And so ??? except or For ??? does he act? or ??? does he act? In any case, it is a problem he said ??? son of Isaac completely ??? For Rav Huna said: Rav said The halacha is And there is no meaning to the word ??? thus and according to Rav Adda bar Ahavah, Rav said for he said: The halacha is ??? thus What is there to say? Rav said ??? For No. ??? Like the stringent rulings of the academy of two in a case ??? For example, ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? and how much time is the duration of its lack ??? The academy of Shammai say two ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? One ??? The academy of Shammai say ??? And the academy of Hillel say so that where one removes ??? from ??? And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said and thus in the matter of ??? but: in a case that is not ??? in a case ??? No. ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? It once happened ??? an etrog On the first of Shevat ??? in it two ??? one in accordance with the words of the academy of Shammai and one in accordance with the words of The academy of Hillel R' ??? for him and not know If it was the academy of Hillel it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? say If it was ??? say and a slave Here in this case, ??? and here in this other case, ??? Rav Yosef in front For Rav Huna ??? and he said Rav Yehudah said Rav said It is a disagreement ??? from here ??? from here ??? from here ??? from here but: ??? from here ??? from here or ??? from here ??? from here makes the image of the opening from here ??? from here now ??? from here ??? from here makes to him the image of the opening from here ??? from here ??? from here ??? from here ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? from here ??? from here was it made? ??? from here ??? from here and would conclude of it in the name of Rav Yehudah if he was ??? a bride ??? it is not necessary anything Abaye said to him: According to Rav Yosef this one of Rav Yehudah of Shmuel She
דף ז,ב גמרא
For if it was of Rav it is a problem of Rav ??? for he said: Rav Yirmiyah bar Abba Rav said ??? to courtyard ??? a courtyward opposite him a courtyward it is permitted. ??? is forbidden But why? ??? He said to him: I No. ??? it was. ??? it was. and he came in front of Rav Yehudah and not ??? and not something and if it is a problem in the name of Rav ??? in the name of Shmuel And there is no difficulty. something now for he said: for him Rav Sheishet for Rav, Shmuel son of Abba and there are those who say According to Rav Yosef son of Abba ??? to you here, ??? here, that did not have ??? of Rav ??? also There is no difficulty. here, ??? My son, a courtyward with My son, ??? here, that did not have ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.