It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ע,א גמרא

??? perhaps, will come ??? them ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? why do I have it is not necessary to teach this Even though it will be that they said for him ??? in order ??? Abaye brought this very question ??? five ??? One and forgot one from them and not ??? nullify ??? It is necessary for him to nullify for all one and one or No. He said to him It is necessary for him to nullify for all one and one ??? one that did not have ??? he gives ??? to one ??? two ??? to one that did not have ??? and two that did not have ??? that two ??? or to one that did not have ??? but not one ??? he gives ??? to one that did not have ??? And there is no meaning to the word two ??? that two that did not have ??? And there is no meaning to the word two that did not have ??? that two that did not have ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, But the beginning of the teaching, one that did not have ??? he gives ??? to one ??? How so? How should we understand this? If it was ??? other than this ??? one ??? except This is obvious! That there are other than this ??? And we have learned to one ??? and Rabbah Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? If it was ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, but: yes. one ??? he gives ??? to one that did not have ??? and if ??? why is it that No. except This is obvious! ??? But the beginning of the teaching, also ??? something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: it is taught at the end that at the beginning of the teaching and two that did not have ??? that two ??? that two yes. to one No. and Abaye said What then does it mean when it says ??? to one ??? If so, Let the Tanna teach: to one ??? or to one that did not have ??? it is a problem one that did not have ??? he gives ??? to one ??? So come and learn from this. ??? It is necessary for him to nullify is a voluntary act for all one and one ??? and not ??? Oftentimes ??? and two ??? to one that did not have ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? immediately that is not ??? Come and learn from this. and two that did not have ??? that two ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? two that did not have ??? for him For it might have entered your mind that I would say: ??? Perhaps will come ??? them Come and learn from this. or to one that did not have ??? why do I have What would you have said? What case is he dealing with? in a case ??? No. ??? but: in a case ??? No. ??? so that that did not have ??? Come and learn from this. but: yes. one ??? he gives ??? to one that did not have ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, And there is no meaning to the word two ??? that two that did not have ??? this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have it is not necessary to teach this ??? for him one ??? What would you have said? ??? for him Come and learn from this. immediately ??? No. are they, for him ??? In this case, a courtyward No. And there is no meaning to the word two that did not have ??? that two that did not have ??? this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have it is not necessary to teach this that they said ??? in order ??? Raba brought this very question ??? What then? that he nullify is a voluntary act

דף ע,ב גמרא

in a case So if he wished, ??? est ??? also ??? nullify but: This immediately So if he wished, ??? he did not find est he did not find nullify or, perhaps, ??? he He said to him I says nullify and Behold! of the academy of Shmuel ??? yes. nullify ??? This is the general rule: all when it is permitted ??? Sabbath ??? for all the Sabbath and all ??? Sabbath ??? for all the Sabbath except ??? is a voluntary act all ??? Sabbath is permitted. for all the Sabbath For example, ??? a way the opening ??? the opening ??? a way ??? This is the general rule: to include ??? or ??? all ??? Sabbath ??? for all the Sabbath All of it For example, two houses with two ??? gentiles a partition on Shabbat This is the general rule: it uses these particular words to include what? to include did he die a stranger i.e., a non-Jew on Shabbat And we have learned except ??? is a voluntary act ??? yes. ??? No. I would say except ??? is a voluntary act ??? one ??? a courtyward ??? to one from ??? while it is still day ??? he does not ??? and one from ??? to one ??? a courtyward while it is still day he does not ??? why is it that ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? also where he teaches until that he nullify Come and hear: Israel ??? One did he die ??? while it is still day

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.