It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עא,א גמרא

despite the fact the one who forcibly took possession Israel after ??? despite the fact that did not have forcibly took possession Israel after he does not ??? this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? while it is still day despite the fact the one who forcibly took possession and not ??? For No. forcibly took possession ??? For No. forcibly took possession No. ??? Rav Pappa said: I would say despite the fact that did not have forcibly took possession Hey, isn't it the case that despite the fact the one who forcibly took possession The tanna teaches: This is what he means: despite the fact that did not have forcibly took possession while it is still day except ??? immediately that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? while it is still day ??? despite the fact that did not have forcibly took possession Israel after he does not ??? despite the fact that did not have forcibly took possession Israel after and not ??? For forcibly took possession ??? For forcibly took possession ??? Rav Pappa said: I would say despite the fact the one who forcibly took possession Hey, isn't it the case that despite the fact that did not have forcibly took possession The tanna teaches: This is what he means: despite the fact the one who forcibly took possession ??? immediately There was not for him ??? while it is still day he does not ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, But the beginning of the teaching, ??? why is it that ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? where he teaches until that he nullify R' Yochanan said: ??? with whom does it agree? the academy of Shammai She that they said yes. ??? is a voluntary act on Shabbat For it was taught in a baraita From when ??? is a voluntary act the academy of Shammai say while it is still day And the academy of Hillel say ??? Ulla said What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? was it made? ??? next to ??? Abayye said: did he die a stranger i.e., a non-Jew on Shabbat What then does it mean when it says ??? next to ??? that it is possible except Here in this case, In this case, what they disagree about for the academy of Shammai reason that ??? is a voluntary act ??? he ??? on Shabbat is forbidden And the academy of Hillel reason that ??? in reality he ??? on Shabbat it is of acceptable worth.

דף עא,א משנה

the master of the house that he was ??? to this ??? and to this ??? are not they all require ??? to this ??? and to this with oil they all require ??? Rabbi Shimon says: One of these and one of these are not they all require ???

דף עא,א גמרא

Rav said and in a vessel one Rabba said: ??? also where he teaches to this ??? and to this with oil they all require ??? If you say, This is satisfactory But the beginning of the teaching, in a vessel one and at the end of the teaching, with two vessels then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, But the beginning of the teaching, with two vessels and at the end of the teaching, with two vessels What do I have to learn from wine and wine What do I have to learn from wine and oil He said to him Abaye wine and wine ??? wine and oil yes. ??? Rabbi Shimon says: One of these and one of these It is not necessary for them ??? and even to this ??? and to this with oil Rabbah said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? that are between two ??? and Rabbi Shimon with his reasoning For it was taught in a baraita he said Rabbi Shimon For what reason The matter is comparable ??? courtyards ??? -- this refers to ??? two the outermost ones with ??? She it is permitted. with them there are. are permitted ??? and two the outermost ones are forbidden this with that He said to him Abaye who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna The tanna teaches: two the outermost ones are forbidden Here in this case, The tanna teaches: It is not necessary for them ??? A general principle: What then does it mean when it says It is not necessary for them ??? the master of the house but: ??? together they all require ???

דף עא,ב גמרא

and Rav Yosef said: Rabbi Shimon And the rabbbis ??? of Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? And the rabbbis ??? For it was taught in a baraita oil ??? atop wine ??? A tevul yom with oil No. ??? except oil only. and Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? says ??? this to this rabbis ??? and Rabbi Shimon like Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? It was taught: ??? son of ??? says One of these and one of these they all require ??? and even to this ??? and to this ??? Rabbah said this came ??? and he poured it and this came ??? and he poured it the whole world does not disagree that there is ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: For example, ??? of wine ??? son of ??? reasoned yes. ??? And the rabbbis reason that there are ??? Rav Yosef said: ??? son of ??? And the rabbbis ??? on ??? in a place ??? what they disagree about ??? reasoned yes. ??? and one master reasons that ??? Rav Yosef said ??? I thought to say to it for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said The halacha is like Rabbi Meir And Rav says ??? Rav said The halacha is ??? son of ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? The reason is he He said to him Abaye and if one The reason is both ??? why do I have Thus can we come and learn from this. that is not ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says rabbis as it is taught: we make an eruv ??? and if ??? yes. we make an eruv ??? and if ??? we make an eruv ??? that did not have ??? from ??? No. ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. but the sages say or we make an eruv or ??? They disagreed about this, R' ??? and Rabbah One says ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.