It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עב,א גמרא

and one says ??? does not disagree ??? both Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? They challenged him from this teaching: But the sages say: or we make an eruv or ??? Is this not or we make an eruv ??? or ??? Rav Gidel said that Rav said This is what he means: or we make an eruv ??? and are permitted in both places lit. and here, and here, or ??? and are permitted in both places lit. and here, and here, Rav Yehudah said Rav said The halacha is like Rabbi ??? and Rav Huna he said ??? like Rabbi Meir And Rabbi Yochanan said: the people followed the custom like Rabbi ???

דף עב,א משנה

five fellowships ??? one the academy of Shammai say ??? for all ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? one for all of them "We thank..." at a time i.e., in a case ??? or ??? that are they all require ??? for all ???

דף עב,א גמרא

Rav Nachman said It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? ten the words of all are ??? for all ??? that it is possible that they said he said ??? Even ??? It is a disagreement They disagreed about this, Rabbi Chiyya and Rabbi Shimon ??? One says It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? that do not ??? the words of all are ??? one for all of them and one says It is a disagreement ??? that do not ??? but: ??? the words of all are they all require ??? for all ???

דף עב,ב גמרא

They challenged him from this teaching: Rabbi Yehuda said ??? No. ??? the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel on ??? for all ??? on Just as ??? on ??? that do not ??? say ??? for all ??? but the academy of Hillel say: ??? for all of them for one for he said: ??? It is a disagreement ??? and for one for he said: ??? that do not ??? It is a disagreement ??? for he said: Rav ??? It is a disagreement ??? for he said: Rav ??? Even ??? It is a disagreement Let us say, ??? Rav Nachman would say to you ??? and it is the law ??? and that one where they do disagree? ??? to make you acknowledge ??? of the academy of Hillel ??? to make you acknowledge ??? for the academy of Shammai The strength ??? is preferable Rav Nachman said Rav said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Our mishna also ??? where he teaches "We thank..." at a time i.e., in a case ??? for all ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? actually and really ??? actually and really This is obvious! except Is this not similar to ??? similar to ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Learn from this a Tanna taught: Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? ??? to the place after but: if he was ??? came ??? the words of all are ??? one for all of them like who ??? this one that teaches five ??? ??? ??? to the place after ??? one for all of them like who ??? Hallel and there are that they said Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? came ??? but: if they were ??? ??? to the place after the words of all are they all require ??? for all ??? like who ??? this one that teaches five ??? ??? ??? to the place after ??? one for all of them like who that is not ???

דף עב,ב משנה

??? that were they eat on table ??? they sleep ??? they all require ??? for all one and one For this reason if forgot one from them and not ??? nullify ??? when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case ??? in a place after but: if he was ??? came ??? or that do not with them ??? are not they all require ???

דף עב,ב גמרא

Learn from this a place ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? The Rabbis taught who in which there is to him the house of the gate ??? his fellow Behold! this yes. ??? upon it ??? the house of ??? the house of the morning the house of ??? the house of ??? Behold! this ??? upon it Rabbi Yehudah says he does not ??? except a place ??? only. Rabbi Yehuda said It once happened ??? that were to him ??? came It once happened before the sages And they said he does not ??? except the house of ??? only. the house of ??? You might have thought except I would say a place ??? What then does it mean when it says a place ??? Rav said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.