It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עג,א גמרא

a place ??? And Shmuel said a place ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and those who guard fruits at a time i.e., in a case whose ways ??? in the city Behold! there are. ??? the city at a time i.e., in a case whose ways ??? in the field there are to them thousands for all wind of there i.e., in another mishna We ??? For if it was ??? them ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? it's settled. them Rav Yosef said No. we heard for me this one ??? Abaye said to him: is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? and to this other teaching is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? that were they eat on table ??? they sleep ??? they all require ??? for all one and one say to you Learn from this a place ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? to us He ascended Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? The rabbis taught: who in which there is to him ??? women ??? and five slaves ??? Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? permits ??? Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? permits ??? Rav said What is the reason? of Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? As it is written (Dan. 2) and Daniel ??? the king This is obvious! son of next to his father ??? a woman next to ??? and a slave next to his rabbi; ??? of Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? And Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? next to his rabbi; What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: of Rav among Rabbi Chiyya he said yes. do we they all require ??? for behold! do we ??? on his table of Rabbi Chiyya And Rabbi Chiyya among Rabbi he said yes. do we they all require ??? for behold! do we ??? on his table of Rabbi Abaye brought this very question ??? five ??? ??? ??? to the place after ??? one for all of them or they all require ??? for all one and one He said to him: ??? one for all of them Hey, isn't it the case that ??? and so when ??? And we have learned they all require ??? for all one and one Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, That there are ??? Behold! also ??? Here, too, ??? where he teaches when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case ??? ??? in a place after but: if he was ??? came ??? or that do not ??? with them ??? It is not necessary for them ??? Learn from this Rav brought this very question Chiyya son of Avin: ??? My son, among Rav ??? bread ??? and they came ??? Rav For ??? them ??? Rav ??? them or ??? them He said to him: ??? Rav Consider this case: he gives ??? in the midst of thousands cubits and comes ??? for him ??? We ??? We ??? We ??? For if it was ??? for him there i.e., in another mishna it's settled. for him ??? We ??? For if it was ??? them ??? my heart Rav it's settled. them ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? his son ??? or ??? they all require ??? or It is not necessary for them ??? that are theirs ??? or yes. ??? He said to him ??? his son ??? at a time i.e., in a case that do not with them ??? Behold! there are. ??? and It is not necessary for them ??? that are theirs ???

דף עג,א משנה

??? courtyards ??? -- this refers to ??? and not ??? are permitted ??? are forbidden ???

דף עג,ב משנה

and if ??? are permitted in both places lit. and here, and here, ??? and forgot one ??? a courtyward and not ??? are permitted in both places lit. and here, and here, ??? and not ??? are permitted ??? are forbidden ???

דף עג,ב גמרא

with whom does it agree? Rabbi Meir She for he said: in the case of ??? and in the case of ??? I would say ??? and if ??? are permitted in both places lit. and here, and here, ??? According to the sages, that they said ??? this one There is no difficulty לא קשיא and if ??? also he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? and forgot one ??? a courtyward and not ??? in both places lit. and here, and here, How so? If it was that is not ??? why is it that ??? except This is obvious! ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, forgot one ??? and not ??? are permitted ??? are forbidden ??? and if ??? why is it that are forbidden ??? And if you say his reasoning is Rabbi Meir yes. ??? is a voluntary act ??? and this was taught! for behold! he nullifies to you ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir except This is obvious! that is not ??? that is not ??? But the beginning of the teaching, also that is not ??? But the beginning of the teaching, and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Meir ??? rabbis All of it Rabbi Meir She and the reason What then does it mean when it says he said Rabbi Meir in the case of ??? and in the case of ??? that did not have ??? from ??? and here in this other case, immediately ??? No. ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav No. It was taught by ??? -- this refers to ??? and thus Rav said ??? Rav No. It was taught by ??? -- this refers to ??? that it is possible that they said Rav Kahana ??? No. It was taught by ??? -- this refers to ??? Abaye said to him: According to Rav Yosef What is the reason? that is not It was taught by ??? -- this refers to ??? his reasoning is all ??? that do not ??? a way openings ??? Is this not ??? the master of the house that he was ??? to this ??? and to this ??? It is not necessary for them ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? How so? ??? and etc. there i.e., in another mishna also ??? He disagreed with this Rabbah son of ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? to him bread ??? So, here, that is not you shall ??? And if you say Here, too, for this statement that Rav Yehudah said poses a contradiction: Rav said Members of a fellowship that they were dining and the day became holy upon them i.e., the start of Shabbat arrived the bread for upon table ??? upon it It is because of this: ??? And there are those who say it was It is because of this: ??? and Rabbah said does not disagree here, ??? in the house of here, ??? except The reason is of Rav that he came reasoned yes. ??? until ??? houses and courtyards ??? to its midst Back to the main body of the text: Rav said yes. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.