It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עז,א גמרא

And Rabbi Yochanan said: these elevate from here and they eat and these elevate from here and they eat We have learnt in a Mishna: these we go up from here and they eat and these we go up from here and they eat we go up We do not elevate No. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: there are in it four on four we go up We do not elevate No. yes. in it four on four elevate also And he is consistent Rabbi Yochanan with his reasoning when Rav Dimi came Rabbi Yochanan said: a place in which is not four on four is permitted. to the children of is a voluntary act the public and to the children of is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? upon it but only that did not have ??? Rav he does not have of Rav ??? If it was ??? a law established by the Torah Here, too, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and the sages they make ??? to their words -- more is from that which is belonging to Torah Rabbah said said ??? Rav Huna Rav Nachman said wall that are between two courtyards ??? one that is high ten handbreadths ??? one the value of ??? that specific to this ??? It is because of this: ??? to this ??? and to this ??? and all to this ??? and to this ??? that specific to this ??? Rav said ??? Rav Nachman said a furrow that are between two courtyards ??? one ??? ten ??? one the value of ??? that specific to this ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected to this ??? and to this ??? and etc. and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was we had heard wall It is because of this: ??? but: a furrow ??? No. ??? I would say No. and if we had heard ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? but: wall ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this came ??? if there are ??? four is permitted. ??? in all the wall all of it And if not, yes. he makes use except opposite ??? Just as your soul If it was ??? wall ??? If it was No. ??? even opposite ??? also did not say Ravina For example, the one who uprooted ??? Rav said ??? But why? a thing ??? on Shabbat he and a thing ??? on Shabbat he does not ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? on earth. And so ??? on earth. What then does it mean when it says you shall and this was taught! ??? if it is revealed ??? on Shabbat Here in this case, with what are we dealing? is what he has ??? And so it has ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall For it was taught in a mishna: ??? under ??? at a time i.e., in a case

דף עז,ב גמרא

??? he does not ??? No. It is because of this: ??? and not It is because of this: tithe and not It is because of this: ??? on Shabbat it is not necessary to teach this who seeks ??? he does not ??? How so? ??? They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? all that do not to him four ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi What is the reason? ??? that is not ??? He said to him: No. Have you heard this one for he said: Rav Acha son of ??? Rav Hamnunah said Rav said It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected a thing ??? on Shabbat and any thing thing ??? on Shabbat he does not ??? If so, Even if ??? also there i.e., in another mishna ??? Abayye said: wall that are between two courtyards that is high ten handbreadths ??? four from here ??? four from here and There is no difference between this to this three handbreadths ??? three he does not ??? They did not say that except in a case that is not you shall wall four but: you shall wall four even ??? also Rav said ??? son of Abaye he built ??? for the sake of ??? if there are ??? the lower one four ??? So, too, yes. ??? four and there are in the upper one four and There is no difference between this to this three ??? And Rav Nachman says Rabbah said son of Avuah ??? if there are ??? the lower one four ??? So, too, yes. ??? and there are ??? the upper one four and There is no difference between this to this three ??? And Rav Nachman says Rabbah said son of Avuah

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.