It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ח,א גמרא

and for what ??? from the beginning between ??? or whether that did not have ??? in what way ??? in what way ??? and the value of ??? what they disagree about ??? Joseph for he said: Rav Yosef They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: a bride ??? is forbidden Rabbah said That which you said, ??? is permitted. They did not say that except in a case this that did not have opposite this but: this opposite this is forbidden Rav said ??? That which you said, this that did not have opposite this is permitted. They did not say that except in a case ??? for many people but: ??? for an individual Oftentimes ??? He ascended and the sons of to it houses ??? to it ??? is forbidden ??? to us between ??? for many people ??? for an individual for he said: ??? son of Rav ??? Rabbi Yitzchak said It once happened ??? one ??? one a bride to the sea ??? one a bride ??? came It once happened before Rabbi and did not say of it No. permission and not prohibits prohibits did not say of it for it is the case that they stand ??? permission did not say of it there is a fear of them. lest ??? and he shall ascend the sea ??? and who there is a fear of them. lest ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? in a public domain that is high ??? handbreadths ??? for upon ??? to it on Shabbat Perhaps, two between ??? for many people ??? for an individual Here in this case, also, two between ??? for many people ??? for an individual And the rabbbis What then does it mean when it says Rav Yosef said son of ??? a Tanna taught: and the sages forbid Rav Nachman said The halacha is in accordance with the words of the sages that it is possible that they said Rav Yosef said son of ??? a Tanna taught: and the sages permit Rav Nachman said That is not the halacha in accordance with the words of the sages ??? interrupt to it ??? he said there is a fear of them. lest he shall ascend the sea ??? This certain individual ??? in Sura, winds ??? of him. ??? Rav Chisdah said this one No. ??? and not ??? for Rav, for he said: His Torah ??? the image of the opening he is required ??? for he said: His Torah ??? What case is he dealing with? ??? but: This immediately ??? of him. ??? and my field for him No. anything he and if ??? of him. ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav said Yirmiyah bar Abba Rav said ??? to courtyard ??? a courtyward opposite him a courtyward it is permitted. ??? is forbidden He said to him: Rabbah bar Ulla to Rav Bibi bar Abaye Rabbi No. ??? She -- this refers to a courtyward a small one ??? that is large it is permitted. and a small one forbidden because of that it ??? of that is large He said to him: If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? in a case that is not ??? of it many but: in a case that he came ??? of it many I would say even a courtyward also and Here, too, ??? a courtyward ??? enters to it ??? to it ??? to Shabbat If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? this that did not have opposite this

דף ח,ב גמרא

but: this opposite this I would say No. ??? for he said: this opposite this is forbidden this one of Rav in what way ??? to it in this that did not have opposite this both why do I have If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? to throw but: ??? I would say No. Come and learn from this. it was said: ??? Abayye said: makes the image of the opening ??? all of them ??? Raba said to him like who ??? for he said: His Torah ??? what is the purpose according to him the image of the opening And furthermore, this one This certain individual ??? in Nehardaya ??? to it ??? except Rabba said: makes the image of the opening ??? for this side And the other one side ??? Rav said ??? son of ??? in the name of Rav ??? son of ??? in the name of Rav ??? son of ??? in the name of Rav ??? of Rav And there are those who say it was Rav Kahana son of ??? we were Rav Kahana ??? of Rav ??? one ??? one ??? less than ??? cubits ??? ??? four cubits he does not ??? ??? except opposite ??? Rava said: One of these and one of these he does not ??? ??? except opposite ??? and so go ahead and say The reason is ??? and so go ahead and say The reason is ??? I would say The reason is ??? The reason is What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: ??? shall not be ??? and so go ahead and say The reason is ??? It is because of this: What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: a partition ??? also you shall a partition Rav said ??? Because and that he brought ??? She I would say of it the validity That which you said, ??? They did not say that except in a case that do not ??? -- more tithe but: there are ??? -- more tithe the words of all are he does not ??? except opposite ??? They posed this difficulty: What then? ??? under ??? Rav And Rabbi Chiyya and R' Yochanan And they said is permitted. ??? under ??? Shmuel and Rabbi Shimon son of Rabbi and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? And they said is forbidden ??? under ??? Let us say, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? It is because of this: ??? and one master reasons that ??? It is because of this: a partition No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? It is because of this: ??? and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that ??? And if you wish, I would say everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world It is because of this: a partition and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? descends ??? and one master reasons that ??? descends ??? Rav Chisdah said Everyone acknowledges ??? that he is forbidden pointed out a contradiction. brought this very question son of Chama ??? two ??? with two ??? on ??? What then? He said to him according to the words of the releasing is forbidden according to the words of ??? is permitted. Rava said: according to the words of ??? he also forbids it. in the case of ??? atop על גבי ??? there is not in this case. ??? Rav ??? son of gifts to Raba it was ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.