It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פ,א גמרא

And there is no meaning to the word ??? And Shmuel said For example, that they said Behold! dates ??? of the academy of ??? for him by day ??? and They said to me: old men ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of Shmuel They challenged him from this teaching: How so? ??? From those that bring ??? of wine and of oil and of ??? and of ??? and of the remainder of varieties of fruits if of his. It is necessary for him ??? and if ??? It is necessary for him ??? from ??? a smidge lit: a whatever What then does it mean when it says a smidge lit: a whatever also for he says ??? it was said: ??? Rav said: it is not necessary ??? And Shmuel said It is necessary for him ??? Rav said: It is necessary for him ??? And Shmuel said it is not necessary ??? This is satisfactory ??? Here in this case, We have learnt in a Mishna: and here in this other case, No. We have learnt in a Mishna: except for Rav, What is the reason? ??? She for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said It once happened ??? of Rabbi ??? to the bathhouse and it has grown dark to it ??? to it ??? came It once happened before Rabbi Chiyya ??? He said to him: Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi ??? all thus in the same way you ??? thus said Abba all in which there is to you ??? them is from that which is belonging to ??? to it but on account of that is not ??? to it or perhaps, ??? to it but on account of ??? He said to them: one of the rabbis And Rabbi Ya'akov ??? To me ??? to it of him of Rabbi Yochanan is from that which is belonging to ??? but on account of that is not ??? to it He said to him: Rabbi Zeira to Rabbi Ya'akov ??? Ya'akov For ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? of him ??? Ya'akov son of This is from that which is belonging to brought this very question ??? but on account of that is not ??? to it or, perhaps, ??? but on account of ??? He said to him: is from that which is belonging to ??? to it but on account of that is not ??? to it Rav Nachman said ??? one ??? and one ??? courtyards one ??? It is necessary for him ??? he is required Rav ??? It is necessary for him ??? or it is not necessary ??? Rav Yosef said And what does it mean when it says ??? for him No. we heard for him this one for he said: ??? son of Rav ??? Shmuel said ??? It is necessary for him ??? Abaye said to him: This is obvious! that is not we heard for him For if it was we heard for him What then does it mean when it says ??? for him He said to him: because ??? who did not say Shmuel it is not necessary ??? and he said ??? It is necessary for him ??? thus now This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna ??? Rav And for Shmuel and Come and hear from this ??? And so ??? But here, in this case, If it was ??? that has heard for him who that it is possible ??? This certain individual ??? of Rabbi Zeira He said to him ??? to us ??? No. ??? them they came in front For R' Zeira And they said to him What then? ??? He said to them Thus said Reish Lakish: in the name ??? Rabbah ??? Rabbi ??? his wife of a person ??? that did not have ??? This certain individual ??? of Rav Yehudah son of ??? they said to him ??? to us ??? No. ??? them they came in front of Rav Yehudah son of ??? they said to him What then? ??? It was not in his hands they came in front of Rav gifts It was not in his hands they came in front of Rav Yehudah He said to them Thus said Shmuel his wife of a person ??? that did not have ??? They challenged him from this teaching: women ??? that did not have ??? yes. ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not ??? Here, too, ??? for if so, it is a problem of Shmuel ??? for Shmuel said: one ??? with My son, ??? and not ??? My son, ??? enters ??? his house ??? from him the master of ??? he is regularly accustomed yes. that do not he is regularly accustomed No. Learn from this Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? that specific to do ???

דף פ,ב גמרא

It is different there in that case ??? that I was it said; Rav Chiyya son of ??? he said doing ??? an Ashera and R' Shimon son of ??? he said doing ??? an Ashera The one who said ??? all the more so ??? and the one who said ??? but: ??? No. ???

דף פ,ב משנה

??? One who eats ??? and it is not necessary ??? about them ??? and it is necessary ??? how much he ??? at a time i.e., in a case that are ??? food two meals for all of them at a time i.e., in a case that are ??? for all one and one he said R' Yosi Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but: ??? Any thing that was And they did not say ??? except so that that did not have ??? ???

דף פ,ב גמרא

with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? one why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even a bride also except with two sectarians. even ??? also No. as it is taught: a bride One who eats ??? one it is not necessary ??? heretics, It is necessary for him ??? If you wish, I would say ??? one And if you wish, I would say ??? sectarians. If you wish, I would say ??? one What then does it mean when it says ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? sectarians. a bride ??? about them ??? Rav said ??? Rav Chisdah said This one says ??? upon it ??? on R' Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Yehuda said Regarding what matters are we speaking? In the eruvs that combine ??? but: In the eruvs that combine courtyards we make an eruv between with understanding or whether that did not have with understanding This is obvious! ??? What would you have said? What case is he dealing with? ??? that are between two ??? but: a courtyward of ??? one I would say No. ??? how much he ??? how much he ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? ten people ??? ten And naught else I would say ??? ten ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? ten ??? Rav said Isaac the son of of Rav Yehudah To me ??? for me from him ??? all ??? to food, two meals ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? for all one and one there are. there are. ??? two meals and if No. ??? Come and hear from this ??? meals there shall be eighteen ???

דף פ,ב משנה

in all we make an eruv ??? except for ??? and from ??? these are the words of ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: a loaf he ??? even ??? This is only in the case ??? yes. we make an eruv of it a loaf ??? This is only in the case ??? we make an eruv therein.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.