It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פז,א גמרא

??? of it four on four ??? He said to him Abaye and perhaps, No. She Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna except for he said: ??? but: ??? No. and Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi ??? son of ??? there i.e., in another mishna except Watch out for leading vav or a platform of ??? Because and there are to it ??? it but: in the remainder of since the days of did not say Abaye and according to the words of R' ??? son of ??? it was ??? to the wall in less than three handbreadths It is necessary for him that it should be ??? four cubits ??? one ten and a smidge lit: a whatever it was ??? It is necessary for him that it should be ??? ten handbreadths ??? six handbreadths and a second person ??? Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua it was is standing ??? It is necessary for him that it should be ??? handbreadths ??? two handbreadths and a second person ??? So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: R' ??? son of ??? says ??? in which there is four cubits on Another explanation: ??? of it four on four ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? For ???

דף פז,א משנה

"true" ??? that it ??? yes. ??? on Shabbat But rather, if so, they make to it a partition that is high ??? handbreadths ??? R' Yehuda says: wall for upon ??? It is because of this: a partition Rabbi Yehuda said It once happened ??? of but: that were ??? from it by the mouth of elders on Shabbat They said to him: because of that did not have he was of it ???

דף פז,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: they make to it ??? and not they make to it ??? they make to it ??? and not they make to it ??? yes. ??? on Shabbat unless it is they make to it a partition ??? handbreadths ??? R' Yehuda says: wall for upon ??? It is because of this: a partition Rabbi Yehuda said It once happened ??? she entered ??? they were ??? on Shabbat by the mouth of the elders They said to him: From here ??? because of that did not have it was ??? handbreadths ??? four Another teaching "true" ??? between ??? less than than three ??? three yes. ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says less than ??? four yes. ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching when Rav Dimi came R' Yochanan said: yes. ??? Let us say, ??? he said ??? except ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When Rav Dimi came Rabbi Yochanan said: a place in which is not four on four is permitted. to the children of is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual and to the children of is a voluntary act the public ??? upon it but only that did not have ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? a law established by the Torah

דף פז,ב גמרא

Here in this case, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis Hey, isn't it the case that R' Yochanan ??? is a law established by the Rabbis also he said ??? wall that are between two courtyards that is high ??? handbreadths ??? four we make an eruv two And there is no meaning to the word we make an eruv one they were on its head fruits these we go up from here and they eat and these we go up from here and they eat ??? the wall until ten cubits we make an eruv two and if ??? we make an eruv one because it was ??? -- more from here we make an eruv one And there is no meaning to the word we make an eruv two and we were at of it yes. in it four What then does it mean when it says Rav said ??? two ??? in it and not ??? in it fill Let him say And Rabbi Yochanan said: these elevate from here and they eat and these elevate from here and they eat And he is consistent Rabbi Yochanan with his reasoning when Rav Dimi came Rabbi Yochanan said: a place in which is not four on four is permitted. to the children of ??? and to the children of ??? upon it but only that did not have ??? this particular ??? he said ??? it is a problem this one ??? to it ??? and Rav Dimi ??? She ??? For ??? Abaye son of Avin: Rav ??? son of Avin: who both say yes. ??? Rav Ashi said: even you say there are ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? Here in this case, ??? Ravina he said For example, ??? to it ??? rabbis ??? and R' Shimon son of ??? with his reasoning

דף פז,ב משנה

??? that it is more from ??? yes. ??? on Shabbat But rather, if so, they make to it a partition its height ten handbreadths between upwards between downwards and thus two ??? -- this refers to is more ??? they make ??? and not they make ??? are forbidden until ???

דף פז,ב גמרא

Our mishna that is not ??? son of ??? as it is taught: ??? son of ??? says ??? in which there is four on four cubits ??? of it four on four ??? R' Yochanan said: It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei son of ??? No. ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? except Watch out for leading vav or a platform of ??? Because and there are to it ??? it but: in the remainder of since the days of No. The Rabbis taught three items ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? water ??? on Shabbat and we insulate ??? water ??? on Shabbat this one of which we were speaking? and we insulate ??? Who is it as it is taught: One who arose early ??? if on account of in which there is upon it ??? Behold! he crying ??? and if on account of that did not have ??? he does not crying ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.