It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צה,א גמרא

??? four permits in a case where its destruction Rav ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah ??? four permits in water with whom does it agree? ??? that you said ??? does not disagree ??? and the words of all are ??? that you said ??? Let us say, Abaye and Raba ??? of Rav And for Shmuel what they disagree about ??? the thatched roof atop ??? in which there is to it ??? It does not have ??? Abaye said ??? And Rabba said is invalid Abaye said ??? he said the mouth of ??? descends ??? And Rabba said is invalid did not say the mouth of ??? descends ??? Let us say, Abaye ??? and Raba ??? who follow the reasoning ??? of Shmuel the whole world does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: who follow the reasoning ??? of Rav Abaye ??? and Raba Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rav there i.e., in another mishna except ??? But here, in this case, ??? Is this not of the sukkah ??? Rabbi Yosei says: if ??? They posed this difficulty: Rabbi Yosei ??? or ??? Rav Sheshet said ??? and thus Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? Another teaching is like this: he said Rabbi Yosei in the same way ??? in the future in going thus in the same way are forbidden to that very Sabbath it was said: Rav Chiyya son of Joseph he said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi And Shmuel said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah And who said it? Shmuel thus For it was taught in a mishna: R' Yehudah said: In what matters are we saying this? In the eruvs that combine ??? but: In the eruvs that combine courtyards we make an eruv between with understanding between that did not have with understanding on account of ??? to a person that did not have in his face, And there is no meaning to the word ??? that did not have in his face, And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah and not only this, but in all places ??? Rabbi Yehudah ??? The halacha is are like him And he said to him: Rav Channah of Baghdad of Rav Yehudah Shmuel said even ??? or ??? And he said to him: ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not ??? Rav said ??? To me ??? for me of him of Shmuel here, ??? here, ??? to the public thoroughfare

דף צה,א משנה

the act of building ??? atop two houses and thus ??? on Shabbat these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. and the sages forbid And furthermore, R' Yehudah said: we make an eruv ??? and the sages forbid

דף צה,א גמרא

Rabbah said No. you say we were The reason is of Rabbi Yehudah It is because of this: that he came reasoned two ??? a law established by the Torah except It is because of this: that thus reasoned the mouth of ??? descends ??? Abaye ??? because of this R' Yehudah said: who in which there is to him two houses ??? makes ??? from here ??? from here or ??? from here ??? from here ??? he gives in the midst of They said to him: yes. we make an eruv ??? objection He said to him ??? yes. ??? there is not in this case. ??? Rav Ashi said Our mishna also ??? When the baraita teaches And furthermore, R' Yehudah said: we make an eruv ??? and the sages forbid If you say, This is satisfactory It is because of this: that he came reasoned the mouth of ??? descends ??? we were where he teaches And furthermore, except If you say, It is because of this: that he came reasoned two ??? a law established by the Torah What then does it mean when it says And furthermore, Learn from this

דף צה,א משנה

The one who finds tefillin ??? Rabban Gamliel says two two In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: ??? is exempt ??? or small sheaves ??? about them ???

דף צה,ב משנה

??? And he would walk... continued on next daf Rabbi Shimon says: ??? to his fellow and his fellow to his fellow until ??? to courtyard ??? and thus his son ??? to his fellow and his fellow to his fellow even hundred Rabbi Yehudah says he gives a person ??? to his fellow and his fellow to his fellow even except ??? They said to him: No. ??? -- this refers to -- more ???

דף צה,ב גמרא

??? one yes. ??? No. Let us say, We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? that is not like Rabbi ??? For if it was like Rabbi ??? Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say all Just as that it is possible ??? all Just as that it is possible ??? For it was taught in a baraita for the sake of lit. in the name of sent forth all implements of ??? all Just as that it is possible ??? all Just as that it is possible ??? and this particular ??? From where can you derive of Rabbi ??? She where he teaches He ascended ??? and sends forth ??? and sends forth ??? even all the day all of it These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabba said: even you say Rabbi Meir there i.e., in another mishna a way ??? like the sand ??? rabbis and here in this other case, a way ??? like the sand ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna ??? how much who seeks ??? in the matter of ??? also ??? for him rabbis Here in this case, ??? also ??? one yes. ??? No. in the matter of ??? also ??? one yes. ??? Rabban Gamliel says: two ??? What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is Sabbath time tefillin he ??? one yes. ??? No. And if his reasoning is Sabbath Is this not time tefillin he but on account of ??? a way ??? for him rabbis even ??? also In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is Sabbath Is this not time tefillin he And so ??? rabbis in the matter of ??? a way ??? in a place tefillin If so, ??? one also yes. ??? did not say Rav Shmuel son of Rav Isaac a place there are on top of lit. on the head of ??? in it two tefillin This is satistfactory ??? What is there to say? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? For Rav Huna said: occasions ??? came from the field ??? on his head ??? I will say For Rav Huna said: that did not have ??? of them a way ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? except Like that which was said by Rav Shmuel son of Rav Isaac a place there are on top of lit. on the head of ??? in it two tefillin Here in this case, also, a place there are in the hand of ??? in it two tefillin a Tanna taught: of the academy of ??? (Deut. 6) on your hand. -- this refers to ??? between your eyes -- this refers to ??? in a case They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? a place ??? of the infant ??? Let us say, ??? Shmuel son of Rav Isaac what they disagree about of the first tanna? he does not have of Rav Shmuel son of Rav Isaac and Rabban Gamliel it has of Rav Shmuel son of Rav Isaac No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world there is for them of Rav Shmuel son of Rav Isaac and here in this other case, on Shabbat time tefillin what they disagree about of the first tanna? reasoned Sabbath time tefillin he and Rabban Gamliel reasoned Sabbath Is this not time tefillin he And if you wish, I would say ??? Sabbath time tefillin he and here in this other case, ??? require concentration and intent. what they disagree about Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned to go out he is required concentration and intent. and Rabban Gamliel reasoned it does not require concentration and intent.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.