PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קי,א גמרא

a commandment in the presence of ??? he No. may he do it? ??? two why is it that double-check he Abayye said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: does not eat two ??? two and not may he do it? ??? even One time perhaps, ??? The Rabbis taught drink ??? on its head Rav Yehudah said when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that did not have he saw the face of ??? but: he saw the face of ??? freedom in his hand Rav Ashi said I saw for him for Rav, ??? son of ??? he was eating a cup it was. he departs and he will see ??? They did not say that except in a case to go out on the way but: in his house did not say R' Zeira ??? on the way he is equivalent. Rav Pappa said: and to go out ??? the seat ??? on the way he is equivalent. and in his house No. Hey, isn't it the case that Raba with whom does it agree? ??? and Abaye For two one a cup ??? for him ??? two ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two his hand and Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak When it was that two two ??? for him one heard him a cup one a cup ??? for him two ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two his hand a person ??? that I Ulla said ten ??? yes. at them." It is because of this: ??? with his reasoning for he said: ??? -- and others say it is in a baraita -- ten ??? the sages in the house of ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ten ??? there are of them It is because of this: ??? in what way does they stand rabbis ??? the validity ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of danger but: ??? there are of them It is because of this: ??? Rav Chisda and Rabbah the son of Rav Huna who both say peace ??? No. ??? but: ??? there are of them It is because of this: ??? Rabbah and Rav Yosef; who both say ??? No. ??? but: four there are of them It is because of this: ??? Abaye and Raba who both say ??? No. ??? And he is consistent Raba with his reasoning of Raba ??? According to the sages, ??? even though ??? Raba son of ??? No. ??? to it ??? for he said: This certain individual It is because of this: ??? it was. Rav Yosef said He said to me: Joseph ??? the king ??? one who was appointed as deputy to the high priest he ??? and the king No. ??? one who caused damage that it is possible that they said to it for this side ??? the king ??? What then does it mean when it says who seeks does he act? ??? hedge to do to him a way And there is no meaning to the word ??? in his hand Rav Pappa said: He said to me: Joseph ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? No. ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two between in error between with intent ??? with intent yes. in error No. and if ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? that are his ??? And let him say thus You and I this one three and if we heard for him for he said: You and I this one four Let him say for him You and I this one five and if we heard for him for he said: You and I this one ??? Let him say for him You and I this one seven it was. ??? until hundred and one ??? he said Ameimar he said for me ??? And if one ??? in them? ??? Let him say thus ??? ???

דף קי,ב גמרא

??? women ??? No. ??? now ??? in the west No. ??? Rav Dimi ??? even ??? it was. ??? all ??? that is not ??? No. ??? When Rav Dimi came he said two ??? and two ??? two ??? and Another thing: The halacha is to Moses ??? the sages, What then does it mean when it says ??? Another thing: ??? rabbis in all of them ??? It is because of this: Another thing: Hey, isn't it the case that of which we were speaking? ten ??? four They do not have It is because of this: ??? They did not say that except in a case in the matter of demons but: in the matter of of witchcraft even ??? also there is a fear of them. This is like ??? a person ??? all day it was. Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes and two wine; it was. ??? for him of witchcraft and not ??? to it of him. It is because of this: ??? day one ??? It was not know how much two until ??? it was. ??? from here and onwards It was not ??? and not ??? When it was that Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? of him. This certain individual ??? He said to him a person ??? he ??? Here in this case, Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? he Rav said ??? and loaves yes. at them." It is because of this: ??? all ??? by human hands yes. at them." It is because of this: ??? heaven of matters varieties of ??? there is a fear of them. ??? They do not have It is because of this: ??? double-check They do not have It is because of this: ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? a woman there is not there It is because of this: ??? and if a woman ??? there is a fear of them. Rav said ??? the son of Rabbi Joshua ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Ravina said in the name of Raba ??? and there are those who say ??? Rav Yosef said two of wine and one ??? No. ??? two ??? and one of wine ??? This is the general rule: all ??? to him from ??? from him tamei from ??? from him tahor Rav Nachman said Rav said two that came first ??? and one ??? one ??? and two ??? No. combine together He disagreed with this Rav ??? because We ??? in the case of ??? a person in the case of and a person ??? and he arises ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world two ??? and one ??? No. ??? For this particular It once happened of Rabbah son of Nachmeni Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said all ???